This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Alexi, A., Lazebnik, T., & Rosenfeld, A. (2024). The scientometrics and reciprocality underlying co-authorship panels in Google Scholar profiles. Scientometrics, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05026-yAlexiA.LazebnikT.RosenfeldA. (2024). The scientometrics and reciprocality underlying co-authorship panels in Google Scholar profiles. Scientometrics, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05026-ySearch in Google Scholar
Bhattacharjee, A., Kumarage, T., Moraffah, R., & Liu, H. (2023). Conda: Contrastive domain adaptation for AI-generated text detection. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 3rd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 598–610). Association for Computational Linguistics.BhattacharjeeA.KumarageT.MoraffahR.LiuH. (2023). Conda: Contrastive domain adaptation for AI-generated text detection. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 3rd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 598–610). Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102370.Bin-NashwanS. A.SadallahM.BouteraaM. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102370.Search in Google Scholar
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Ben Saad, H. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615–622.DergaaI.ChamariK.ZmijewskiP.Ben SaadH. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615–622.Search in Google Scholar
Draxler, F., Werner, A., Lehmann, F., Hoppe, M., Schmidt, A., Buschek, D., & Welsch, R. (2023). The AI ghostwriter effect: When users do not perceive ownership of AI-generated text but self-declare as authors. arXiv:2303.03283DraxlerF.WernerA.LehmannF.HoppeM.SchmidtA.BuschekD.WelschR. (2023). The AI ghostwriter effect: When users do not perceive ownership of AI-generated text but self-declare as authors. arXiv:2303.03283Search in Google Scholar
Editorial. (2023). Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature, 613.Editorial. (2023). Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature, 613.Search in Google Scholar
Lazebnik, T., & Rosenfeld, A. (2023). A computational model for individual scholars’ writing style dynamics. arXiv:2305.04900LazebnikT.RosenfeldA. (2023). A computational model for individual scholars’ writing style dynamics. arXiv:2305.04900Search in Google Scholar
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26–29.LundB. D.WangT. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26–29.Search in Google Scholar
Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887.SallamM. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887.Search in Google Scholar
Seßler, K., Xiang, T., Bogenrieder, L., & Kasneci, E. (2023). Peer: Empowering writing with large language models. In O. Viberg, I. Jivet, P. Muñoz-Merino, M. Perifanou, & T. Papathoma (Eds.), Responsive and sustainable educational futures (pp. 755–761). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14200. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42682-7_73SeßlerK.XiangT.BogenriederL.KasneciE. (2023). Peer: Empowering writing with large language models. In VibergO.JivetI.Muñoz-MerinoP.PerifanouM.PapathomaT. (Eds.), Responsive and sustainable educational futures (pp. 755–761). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14200. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42682-7_73Search in Google Scholar
Semrl, N., Feigl, S., Taumberger, N., Bracic, T., Fluhr, H., Blockeel, C., & Kollmann, M. (2023). AI language models in human reproduction research: Exploring ChatGPT’s potential to assist academic writing. Human Reproduction, 38(12), 2281–2288.SemrlN.FeiglS.TaumbergerN.BracicT.FluhrH.BlockeelC.KollmannM. (2023). AI language models in human reproduction research: Exploring ChatGPT’s potential to assist academic writing. Human Reproduction, 38(12), 2281–2288.Search in Google Scholar
Sikes, P. (2009). Will the real author come forward? Questions of ethics, plagiarism, theft and collusion in academic research writing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 13–24.SikesP. (2009). Will the real author come forward? Questions of ethics, plagiarism, theft and collusion in academic research writing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 13–24.Search in Google Scholar
Su, J., Zhuo, T. Y., Wang, D., & Nakov, P. (2023). DetectLLM: Leveraging log rank information for zero-shot detection of machine-generated text. arXiv:2306.05540SuJ.ZhuoT. Y.WangD.NakovP. (2023). DetectLLM: Leveraging log rank information for zero-shot detection of machine-generated text. arXiv:2306.05540Search in Google Scholar
Tang, R., Chuang, Y.-N., & Hu, X. (2023). The science of detecting LLM-generated texts. arXiv:2303.07205TangR.ChuangY.-N.HuX. (2023). The science of detecting LLM-generated texts. arXiv:2303.07205Search in Google Scholar
Wu, K., Pang, L., Shen, H., Cheng, X., & Chua, T.-S. (2023). LLMDet: A third party large language models generated text detection tool. In H. Bouamor, J. Pino, & K. Bali (Eds.), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 (pp. 2113–2133). Association for Computational Linguistics.WuK.PangL.ShenH.ChengX.ChuaT.-S. (2023). LLMDet: A third party large language models generated text detection tool. In BouamorH.PinoJ.BaliK. (Eds.), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 (pp. 2113–2133). Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Yuan, A., Coenen, A., Reif, E., & Ippolito, D. (2022). Wordcraft: Story writing with large language models. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ′22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 841–852. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490099.3511105YuanA.CoenenA.ReifE.IppolitoD. (2022). Wordcraft: Story writing with large language models. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ′22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 841–852. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490099.3511105Search in Google Scholar
Zargari, H., Rosenfeld, A., & Elmalech, A. (2023). Online self-presentation: Examining gender differences in academic scholars’ personal web-pages. In Proceedings of iConference 2023.ZargariH.RosenfeldA.ElmalechA. (2023). Online self-presentation: Examining gender differences in academic scholars’ personal web-pages. In Proceedings of iConference 2023.Search in Google Scholar