Is big team research fair in national research assessments? The case of the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021

Aksnes, D. W., Schneider, J. W., & Gunnarsson, M. (2012). Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 36–43. AksnesD. W. SchneiderJ. W. GunnarssonM. 2012 Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods Journal of Informetrics 6 1 36 43 10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.002 Search in Google Scholar

Bloch, C., & Schneider, J. W. (2016). Performance-based funding models and researcher behavior: An analysis of the influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the individual level. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 371–382. BlochC. SchneiderJ. W. 2016 Performance-based funding models and researcher behavior: An analysis of the influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the individual level Research Evaluation 25 4 371 382 10.1093/reseval/rvv047 Search in Google Scholar

Bouabid, H. (2014). Science and technology metrics for research policy evaluation: some insights from a Moroccan experience. Scientometrics, 101(1), 899–915. BouabidH. 2014 Science and technology metrics for research policy evaluation: some insights from a Moroccan experience Scientometrics 101 1 899 915 10.1007/s11192-014-1407-3 Search in Google Scholar

Debackere, K., & Glänzel, W. (2004). Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key. Scientometrics, 59(2), 253–276. DebackereK. GlänzelW. 2004 Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key Scientometrics 59 2 253 276 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018532.70146.02 Search in Google Scholar

Engels, T. C., & Guns, R. (2018). The Flemish performance-based research funding system: A unique variant of the Norwegian model. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 45–60. EngelsT. C. GunsR. 2018 The Flemish performance-based research funding system: A unique variant of the Norwegian model Journal of Data and Information Science 3 4 45 60 10.2478/jdis-2018-0020 Search in Google Scholar

Gauffriau, M., & Larsen, P. O. (2005). Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies. Scientometrics, 64(1), 85–93. GauffriauM. LarsenP. O. 2005 Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies Scientometrics 64 1 85 93 10.1007/s11192-005-0239-6 Search in Google Scholar

Gauffriau, M. (2021). Counting methods introduced into the bibliometric research literature 1970–2018: A review. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(3), 932–975. GauffriauM. 2021 Counting methods introduced into the bibliometric research literature 1970–2018: A review Quantitative Science Studies 2 3 932 975 10.1162/qss_a_00141 Search in Google Scholar

Hagen, N. T. (2010). Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably–not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84(3), 785–793. HagenN. T. 2010 Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably–not equally, geometrically or arithmetically Scientometrics 84 3 785 793 10.1007/s11192-009-0129-4290942820700372 Search in Google Scholar

Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261. HicksD. 2012 Performance-based university research funding systems Research Policy 41 2 251 261 10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007 Search in Google Scholar

Jeon, J., & Kim, S. Y. (2018). Is the gap widening among universities? On research output inequality and its measurement in the Korean higher education system. Quality & Quantity, 52(2), 589–606. JeonJ. KimS. Y. 2018 Is the gap widening among universities? On research output inequality and its measurement in the Korean higher education system Quality & Quantity 52 2 589 606 10.1007/s11135-017-0652-y Search in Google Scholar

Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Alphabetization and the skewing of first authorship towards last names early in the alphabet. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 575–582. LevittJ. M. ThelwallM. 2013 Alphabetization and the skewing of first authorship towards last names early in the alphabet Journal of Informetrics 7 3 575 582 10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.002 Search in Google Scholar

Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. MoedH. F. 2005 Citation analysis in research evaluation Dordrecht, Netherlands Springer Search in Google Scholar

Mongeon, P., Smith, E., Joyal, B., & Larivière, V. (2017). The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship. PloS One, 12(9), e0184601. MongeonP. SmithE. JoyalB. LarivièreV. 2017 The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship PloS One 12 9 e0184601 10.1371/journal.pone.0184601 Search in Google Scholar

Nielsen, M. W. (2017). Gender consequences of a national performance-based funding model: new pieces in an old puzzle. Studies in Higher Education, 42(6), 1033–1055. NielsenM. W. 2017 Gender consequences of a national performance-based funding model: new pieces in an old puzzle Studies in Higher Education 42 6 1033 1055 10.1080/03075079.2015.1075197 Search in Google Scholar

REF2021 (2020). Guidance. https://www.ref.ac.uk/guidance-and-criteria-on-submissions/guidance/ REF2021 2020 Guidance https://www.ref.ac.uk/guidance-and-criteria-on-submissions/guidance/ Search in Google Scholar

Sivertsen, G., Rousseau, R., & Zhang, L. (2019). Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 679–694. SivertsenG. RousseauR. ZhangL. 2019 Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting Journal of Informetrics 13 2 679 694 10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.010 Search in Google Scholar

Sivertsen, G. (2018). The Norwegian model in Norway. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 2–18. SivertsenG. 2018 The Norwegian model in Norway Journal of Data and Information Science 3 4 2 18 10.2478/jdis-2018-0017 Search in Google Scholar

Van Hooydonk, G. (1997). Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 944–945. Van HooydonkG. 1997 Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48 10 944 945 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<944::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-1 Search in Google Scholar

Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391. WaltmanL. 2016 A review of the literature on citation impact indicators Journal of Informetrics 10 2 365 391 10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 Search in Google Scholar

Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., & Hill, S., Jones, R., Kain, R., Kerridge, S., Thelwall, M., Tinkler, I. V., Wouters, P., Hill, J., & Johnson, B. (2015). The Metric Tide. Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363 WilsdonJ. AllenL. BelfioreE. CampbellP. CurryS. HillS. JonesR. KainR. KerridgeS. ThelwallM. TinklerI. V. WoutersP. HillJ. JohnsonB. 2015 The Metric Tide. Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363 10.4135/9781473978782 Search in Google Scholar

Woelert, P., & McKenzie, L. (2018). Follow the money? How Australian universities replicate national performance-based funding mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 27(3), 184–195. WoelertP. McKenzieL. 2018 Follow the money? How Australian universities replicate national performance-based funding mechanisms Research Evaluation 27 3 184 195 10.1093/reseval/rvy018 Search in Google Scholar