This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Aksnes, D. W., Schneider, J. W., & Gunnarsson, M. (2012). Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 36–43.AksnesD. W.SchneiderJ. W.GunnarssonM.2012Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods61364310.1016/j.joi.2011.08.002Search in Google Scholar
Bloch, C., & Schneider, J. W. (2016). Performance-based funding models and researcher behavior: An analysis of the influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the individual level. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 371–382.BlochC.SchneiderJ. W.2016Performance-based funding models and researcher behavior: An analysis of the influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the individual level25437138210.1093/reseval/rvv047Search in Google Scholar
Bouabid, H. (2014). Science and technology metrics for research policy evaluation: some insights from a Moroccan experience. Scientometrics, 101(1), 899–915.BouabidH.2014Science and technology metrics for research policy evaluation: some insights from a Moroccan experience101189991510.1007/s11192-014-1407-3Search in Google Scholar
Debackere, K., & Glänzel, W. (2004). Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key. Scientometrics, 59(2), 253–276.DebackereK.GlänzelW.2004Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key59225327610.1023/B:SCIE.0000018532.70146.02Search in Google Scholar
Engels, T. C., & Guns, R. (2018). The Flemish performance-based research funding system: A unique variant of the Norwegian model. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 45–60.EngelsT. C.GunsR.2018The Flemish performance-based research funding system: A unique variant of the Norwegian model34456010.2478/jdis-2018-0020Search in Google Scholar
Gauffriau, M., & Larsen, P. O. (2005). Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies. Scientometrics, 64(1), 85–93.GauffriauM.LarsenP. O.2005Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies641859310.1007/s11192-005-0239-6Search in Google Scholar
Gauffriau, M. (2021). Counting methods introduced into the bibliometric research literature 1970–2018: A review. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(3), 932–975.GauffriauM.2021Counting methods introduced into the bibliometric research literature 1970–2018: A review2393297510.1162/qss_a_00141Search in Google Scholar
Hagen, N. T. (2010). Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably–not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84(3), 785–793.HagenN. T.2010Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably–not equally, geometrically or arithmetically84378579310.1007/s11192-009-0129-4290942820700372Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.HicksD.2012Performance-based university research funding systems41225126110.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007Search in Google Scholar
Jeon, J., & Kim, S. Y. (2018). Is the gap widening among universities? On research output inequality and its measurement in the Korean higher education system. Quality & Quantity, 52(2), 589–606.JeonJ.KimS. Y.2018Is the gap widening among universities? On research output inequality and its measurement in the Korean higher education system52258960610.1007/s11135-017-0652-ySearch in Google Scholar
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Alphabetization and the skewing of first authorship towards last names early in the alphabet. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 575–582.LevittJ. M.ThelwallM.2013Alphabetization and the skewing of first authorship towards last names early in the alphabet7357558210.1016/j.joi.2013.03.002Search in Google Scholar
Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.MoedH. F.2005Dordrecht, NetherlandsSpringerSearch in Google Scholar
Mongeon, P., Smith, E., Joyal, B., & Larivière, V. (2017). The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship. PloS One, 12(9), e0184601.MongeonP.SmithE.JoyalB.LarivièreV.2017The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship129e018460110.1371/journal.pone.0184601Search in Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. W. (2017). Gender consequences of a national performance-based funding model: new pieces in an old puzzle. Studies in Higher Education, 42(6), 1033–1055.NielsenM. W.2017Gender consequences of a national performance-based funding model: new pieces in an old puzzle4261033105510.1080/03075079.2015.1075197Search in Google Scholar
REF2021 (2020). Guidance. https://www.ref.ac.uk/guidance-and-criteria-on-submissions/guidance/REF20212020https://www.ref.ac.uk/guidance-and-criteria-on-submissions/guidance/Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G., Rousseau, R., & Zhang, L. (2019). Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 679–694.SivertsenG.RousseauR.ZhangL.2019Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting13267969410.1016/j.joi.2019.03.010Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2018). The Norwegian model in Norway. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 2–18.SivertsenG.2018The Norwegian model in Norway3421810.2478/jdis-2018-0017Search in Google Scholar
Van Hooydonk, G. (1997). Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 944–945.Van HooydonkG.1997Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors481094494510.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<944::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-1Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391.WaltmanL.2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators10236539110.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007Search in Google Scholar
Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., & Hill, S., Jones, R., Kain, R., Kerridge, S., Thelwall, M., Tinkler, I. V., Wouters, P., Hill, J., & Johnson, B. (2015). The Metric Tide. Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363WilsdonJ.AllenL.BelfioreE.CampbellP.CurryS.HillS.JonesR.KainR.KerridgeS.ThelwallM.TinklerI. V.WoutersP.HillJ.JohnsonB.2015https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.136310.4135/9781473978782Search in Google Scholar
Woelert, P., & McKenzie, L. (2018). Follow the money? How Australian universities replicate national performance-based funding mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 27(3), 184–195.WoelertP.McKenzieL.2018Follow the money? How Australian universities replicate national performance-based funding mechanisms27318419510.1093/reseval/rvy018Search in Google Scholar