Bombus species are adapted to different climatic and environmental conditions, having a wide range of habitats from sea level up to 5800 m.
The many benefits of commercially produced Bombus colonies including increased yield and quality of fruit in undergrowth cultivation and reduced use of hormones and chemical drugs have increased demand globally since the 1980s (Ono, 1998; Gürel et al., 1999; Goulson & Hanley, 2004; Hingston, 2006; Velthuis & van Doorn, 2006; Inoue et al., 2008; Williams & Osborne, 2009). However, bees emerging from commercial colonies are reported to cause problems (Goulson & Hughes, 2015) such as competition with local Bombus species for nesting and ecotypes (Goulson, 2003; Inoue & Yokoyama, 2010; Aizen, 2018) because it has escaped from greenhouses (Seabra et al., 2019) and colonized the environment (Kraus et al., 2011). Trillo et al. (2019) reported the presence of managed bumblebees escaping from greenhouses and feeding on the same flowering plants with the native ones, especially in winter. Thus, there has likely been genetic contamination due to hybridization (Rhymer & Simberloff, 1996; Ings et al., 2006; Kanbe et al., 2008; Goulson, 2010). In addition, this species, which is highly invasive (Hingston et al., 2002), is thought to cause the spread of exotic diseases (Whitehorn et al., 2013). Due to such reasons, natural bumblebee populations are thought to be negatively affected and even at risk of extinction in some places (Goulson, 2003; Cejas et al., 2018; Tsuchida et al., 2019). However, there is a lack of knowledge about the current state of most populations (Chandler et al., 2019). Genetic studies on the detection of introgression between commercial and native Bombus populations are still scarce (Kraus et al., 2011; Seabra et al., 2019; Cejas et al., 2020).
Each year, approximately two million commercially produced Bombus colonies are estimated to be shipped globally (Lecocq et al., 2016), and almost 300,000 colonies are used per year, especially in tomato pollination, in Turkey alone (Cilavdaroglu & Gurel, 2020). In greenhouses in Turkey there are no measures in place to prevent the escape of bumblebees into the natural habitat. Furthermore, as is also usually practiced in Portugal, hive boxes at the end of their useful life are left outside of greenhouses with bees still in residence (Seabra et al., 2019). In many species, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is used for identifying the inter and intra specific differences due to high evolution ratio compared to nuclear DNA and to non-recombining and maternal inheritance (Rubinoff & Holland, 2005). In this context, animal mtDNA is a reliable and valid marker for population genetics and phylogenetic studies. Although the
The genetic structure of commercial colonies taken from companies in Antalya and their possible genetic effects on local genotypes are not fully known. Therefore, the genetic diversity of
Fifteen
The bumblebees were caught with use of an entomological net. The coordinates and altitude information of the sampling locations are given in Fig. 1. The samples were stored in collection tubes with pure ethanol at +4°C until DNA extraction.
The thorax of each bumblebee was placed in an individual tube and crushed through the application of cold nitrogen. The CTAB method was used to extract DNA (Doyle, 1990). The quantities and qualities of DNA were determined through BioDrop spectrophotometer. In addition, DNA molecules integrity was checked on a 1% agarose gel. Specific primers selected for COI and CytB gene regions in mtDNA were those described in Tab. 1. PCR assays were conducted with 2 μl of each template DNA in a total reaction volume of 40 μl. The PCR reaction mix contained 0.25 mM dNTP mix, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 1.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase and 0.075 mM each primer. The thermal conditions for PCR were 94°C for an initial 5 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s; and a final 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products, which were run on 2% agarose gel, were purified with EXOSAP and amplified fragments were cleared with a Zymogen DNA sequencing clean-up kit. Double strand DNA sequencing was performed on ABI Prism 3100.
Primer sets used in PCR amplifications of mtDNA COI and CytB gen regions of
Primers (5′-3′) | Gene/size | References |
---|---|---|
F-CAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTTGG | COI/758 bp | Sperling and Hickey (1994) |
F-TACTACCATGAGGACAAATATC | CytB/434 bp | Morath (2007) |
The COI and CytB gene region sequences of mtDNA were examined for each individual with the use of ChromasPro version 1.7.4 (Technelysium Pty. Ltd. Australia), and incorrect and uncertain reads resulting from sequencer were edited based on visual examination of the chromatograms. The ends of the reads presenting lower quality bases were trimmed and thus the length of the sequence used in further analysis has been shortened. Analyzes were continued with DNA sequences from 157 individuals for COI (204 bp:base pairs) and 170 individuals for CytB (373 bp). At several base positions there were double peaks in the chromatograms, and examples are shown in the Sup. Fig. 1. Since all suspicious artifacts were removed from the sequences, the sequences with double peaks were considered heteroplasmic. Thus, sequences belonging to all individuals were used twice, whether heteroplasmic or not, in order not to make a proportional error. So, including these sites, haplotype analysis was performed on total of 314 (2*157) DNA sequences for the COI and 340 (2*170) DNA sequences for the CytB. Sequenced DNA regions were searched against BLAST (GenBank: JQ820651.1 for COI and GenBank: JQ820853.1 for CytB). Sequence alignment was conducted with MEGA 6 (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, version 6.06.) software (Tamura et al., 2013). SNPs were identified, and the haplotypes for each region were generated with DnaSP (version 5.10.01) software (Rozas, 2010). Also, such diversity parameters as haplotype (gene) diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (π) were calculated for the studied gene regions.
Arlequin (version 33.11) software was used to calculate genetic differentiation within and among the populations (Excoffier et al., 2007) with the unbiased fixation index (FST) based on information of haplotypes (p<0.01, p<0.05). Molecular variation (AMOVA) was analyzed to calculate genetic variation values for both studied gene regions through the use haplotype sequences detected in COI and CytB. Phylogenetic analyses were made with TASSEL (version 5.2.43) software (Bradbury et al., 2007) through the use of the genetic distance matrices among populations. Mutational relationships among haplotypes were represented by median-joining (MJ) Network (version 5.0.0.3) software (Bandelt et al., 1999).
In all analyzed individuals, the COI fragment sequence had 204 base pairs, and the CytB fragment sequence had 373 base pairs. According to the results of the BLAST analyses, the DNA nucleotide sequences obtained from mtDNA COI and CytB gene fragments were determined to belong to
Sequence alignment revealed twenty-five and forty-one variable nucleotide sites for COI and CytB, respectively. The results of the haplotype analysis showed that bumblebees had sixteen haplotypes in the COI fragment (Sup. Tab. 1) and twenty haplotypes in the CytB fragment (Sup. Tab. 2). The single haplotype, H1, was widespread with a high frequency in the individuals for both genes. Regarding distribution, H1 in the COI and CytB was detected in all populations excluding Termessos for COI and Bayatbademler for CytB.
Other haplotypes were restricted to one, two or five populations and had a low frequency (Tab. 2 and Tab. 3). For example, H3, H4, H6, H9, and H10 in terms of COI and H2, H7, H8, H9, and H19 in terms of CytB were only in samples taken from companies (Tab. 2 and Tab. 3). After haplotype (gene) and nucleotide diversity parameters were calculated, the highest values were found in natural areas for both genes (Tab. 4 and Tab. 5). The distribution of haplotypes was visualized with the Median-Joining Network (Fig. 2a–b), but both network patterns showed that there was some differentiation between groups in general (Fig. 2a–b). These figures (2a–b) show that greenhouse areas and commercial companies had more common haplotypes, and conversely natural areas were visibly separated from the others. Bees collected from greenhouse areas were closer to commercially produced bees genetically according to network pattern.
Distribution of haplotypes detected in the COI gene region of the
Populations | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6 | H7 | H8 | H9 | H10 | H11 | H12 | H13 | H14 | H15 | H16 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outgroup | Lecocq_2013 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Company_1 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Company_2 | 13 | 11 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Companies | Company_3 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Company_4 | 22 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
Company_5 | 14 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
Demre | 18 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
Greenhouse centers | Kumluca | 18 | 4 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Aksu | 18 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Geyikbayiri | 17 | 1 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||
Phaselis | 4 | 26 | |||||||||||||||
Natural areas | Termessos | 15 | 15 | ||||||||||||||
Bayatbademler | 16 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
Total | 166 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 12 | 26 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
Distribution of haplotypes detected in the CytB gene region of the
Population | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6 | H7 | H8 | H9 | H10 | H11 | H12 | H13 | H14 | H15 | H16 | H17 | H18 | H19 | H20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outgroup | Lecocq_2013 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Company_1 | 20 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Company_2 | 24 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Companies | Company_3 | 18 | 11 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
Company_4 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Company_5 | 18 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||
Demre | 20 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Greenhouse centers | Kumluca | 25 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Aksu | 16 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Geyikbayiri | 11 | 14 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Natural areas | Phaselis | 15 | 2 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||
Termessos | 26 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Bayatbademler | 14 | 11 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | 210 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 14 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
AMOVA (Analyses of Molecular Variance) results and some diversity parameters calculated using COI fragments for all bumblebee populations
Populations | Source of variation in populations | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation | Haplotype diversity | Nucleotide diversity | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Companies | Company_1 | Among | 4 | 21.55 | 0.189 | 19.55 | 0.009 | |
Company_2 | ||||||||
Company_3 | Within | 118 | 92.103 | 0.780 | 80.45 | 0.582 | ||
Company_4 | ||||||||
Company_5 | ||||||||
Greenhousecenters | Demre | Among | 2 | 8.612 | 0.134 | 23.48 | ||
Kumluca | 0.493 | 0.005 | ||||||
Aksu | Within | 83 | 36.105 | 0.439 | 76.52 | |||
Natural areas | Geyikbayiri | |||||||
Phaselis | Among | 3 | 60.13 | 0.679 | 47.55 | |||
Termessos | Within | 110 | 82.49 | 0.749 | 52.45 | 0.805 | 0.012 | |
Bayatbademler | ||||||||
All populations (including outgroup) | Among | 12 | 114.828 | 0.368 | 34.59 | 0.697 | 0.010 | |
Within | 303 | 211.032 | 0.696 | 65.41 |
AMOVA (Analyses of Molecular Variance) results and some diversity parameters calculated using CytB fragments for all bumblebee populations
Populations | Source of variation in populations | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation | Haplotype diversity | Nucleotide diversity | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Companies | Company_1 | Among | 4 | 95.889 | 0.730 | 21.67 | 0.439 | 0.017 |
Company_2 | ||||||||
Company_3 | 141 | |||||||
Company_4 | Within | 372.467 | 2.641 | 78.33 | ||||
Company_5 | ||||||||
Greenhousecenters | Demre | Among | 2 | 60.639 | 1.096 | 35.65 | 0.380 | 0.014 |
Kumluca | Within | 75 | 148.425 | 1.979 | 64.35 | |||
Aksu | ||||||||
Natural areas | Geyikbayiri Phaselis | Among | 3 | 116.624 | 1.197 | 20.00 | 0.799 | 0.030 |
Termessos Bayatbademler | Within | 110 | 526.946 | 4.790 | 80.00 | |||
All populations (including outgroup) | Among | 12 | 422.418 | 1.227 | 27.53 | 0.608 | 0.023 | |
Within | 328 | 1059.940 | 3.231 | 72.47 |
As a result of AMOVA (Tab. 4–5), the percentage of variation within populations was higher than among populations for both COI and CytB gene regions in all populations and each group. The mean FST values were calculated as 0.346 for COI and 0.275 for CytB. Also, the highest and the lowest pairwise FST values for COI were detected as 0.78 between Aksu and Phaselis and as 0.00 between Company_2 and Termessos, respectively (Tab. 6). The highest and the lowest FST values for CytB were detected as 0.50 between Company 4 and Termessos and as 0.02 between Geyikbayiri and Phaselis, respectively (Tab. 6). Genetic distances between populations are lower among individuals who are commercially produced and caught around the greenhouse regions.
Pairwise FST values calculated for COI region below diagonal and for CytB above diagonal of the
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | −0.48 | −0.80 | −0.25 | 0.00 | −0.24 | −0.91 | −0.85 | −0.25 | −0.03 | −0.13 | 0.02 | −0.19 | |
2 | −0.85 | 0.07* | 0.22** | 0.26** | 0.22** | 0.23** | 0.22** | 0.25** | 0.40** | 0.37** | 0.27** | 0.33** | |
3 | −0.30 | 0.23** | 0.21** | 0.10* | 0.17** | 0.08** | 0.08** | 0.23** | 0.32** | 0.27** | 0.27** | 0.27** | |
4 | −0.63 | 0.08* | 0.16** | 0.37** | 0.15** | 0.34** | 0.36** | 0.04 | 0.28** | 0.27** | 0.26** | 0.18** | |
5 | −0.63 | −0.01 | 0.30** | 0.15** | 0.37** | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.38** | 0.49** | 0.43** | 0.50** | 0.41** | |
6 | −0.04 | 0.06 | 0.26** | 0.14* | 0.13* | 0.34** | 0.35** | 0.15** | 0.21** | 0.18** | 0.24** | 0.20** | |
7 | −0.24 | 0.18** | 0.23** | 0.05 | 0.26** | 0.22** | 0.06 | 0.34** | 0.45** | 0.39** | 0.46** | 0.37** | |
8 | −0.80 | 0.01 | 0.26** | 0.13** | 0.02 | 0.13** | 0.23** | 0.37** | 0.48** | 0.41** | 0.48** | 0.39** | |
9 | −0.89 | 0.00 | 0.28** | 0.17** | 0.00 | 0.27** | 0.27** | 0.03 | 0.28** | 0.26** | 0.27** | 0.15** | |
10 | −0.75 | 0.05 | 0.19** | 0.12* | 0.10* | 0.16** | 0.17** | 0.05* | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.27** | 0.14* | |
11 | 0.72 | 0.57** | 0.26** | 0.53** | 0.74** | 0.64** | 0.56** | 0.62** | 0.78** | 0.47** | 0.31** | 0.12** | |
12 | −0.03 | 0.34** | −0.00 | 0.23** | 0.41** | 0.37** | 0.30** | 0.37** | 0.40** | 0.30** | 0.39** | 0.27** | |
13 | 0.45* | 0.55** | 0.40** | 0.54** | 0.67** | 0.67** | 0.59** | 0.58** | 0.67** | 0.48** | 0.74** | 0.48** |
1: Outgroup (Lecocq et al., 2013), 2: Company_1, 3: Company_2, 4: Company_3, 5: Company_4, 6: Company_5, 7: Demre, 8: Kumluca, 9: Aksu, 10: Geyikbayiri, 11: Phaselis, 12: Termessos, 13: Bayatbademler.
In order to determine the genetic relationships among the twelve different populations of
Both COI and CytB have a common haplotype (H1) in all populations, except in the Bayatbademler and Termessos populations, suggesting that the studied populations belong to the same subspecies,
In another study, commercial individuals escaping from greenhouses were shown to hybridize with individuals in the vicinity. In addition, if natural bees are far enough from greenhouse areas, they show the ability to preserve their original genetic structure (Kraus et al., 2011). Cejas et al. (2018) showed 16s haplotype as evidence of integration between
AMOVA analysis revealed that genetic variation within populations is greater than among populations. One reason for this situation may be hybridization between populations. Individuals carrying a genomic structure from one population to another may have increased intra-population variation due to hybridization, while reducing genetic variation between populations. The
Although few studies have been conducted in Turkey, up to fifty different Bombus species have been identified. Based on world-species distribution, Turkey is understood to be an important genetic resource in terms of bumblebees (Özbek, 1997; Barkan & Aytekin, 2013; Meydan et al., 2016), but it is not clear whether there is a hybridization between natural populations and commercial ones. Thus, the genetic diversity of Turkey's local
The Antalya province is where
Although it is difficult to prove that commercially produced bees and wild bees are hybridized, bees fleeing from greenhouses can compete with natural bees in terms of nest and nutrient sharing. The invasive potential of commercially produced bumblebees has been clearly identified in several studies. Ings et al. (2006) used a paired design to compare the nectar-foraging performance and reproductive outputs of commercial and native colonies growing under identical field conditions, and they found that the commercial colonies have high reproductive success, superior foraging ability and large colony size. In a study conducted in Turkey, Gösterit (2017) determined that the colonies founded by commercial queens produced more than twice the number of gynes (82.11±9.32) than colonies founded by native queens (32.85±3.99).
Pirounakis et al. (1998) reported that the CytB gene could be successfully used to identify geographical subspecies of bumblebees. In another study using the CytB gene, the genetic structure of
Although the investigation of heteroplasmy was not the subject of this study we surprisingly encountered individuals with double peaks, which were too obvious to be considered as artifacts in sequencing of both directions. (Sup. Fig. 1). As mentioned in previous similar studies (Wernick et al., 2016; Williams et al., 2019; Pizzirani et al., 2020; Ricardo et al., 2020; Tikochinski et al., 2020) double peaks on sequence traces with both alleles from one individual were identified as mitochondrial heteroplasmy and a single individual with two haplotypes. At least one heteroplasmy was detected in 93 of 157 individuals for COI and at least 105 of 170 individuals for CytB in the current study. Ricardo et al. (2020) reported that heteroplasmy was detected in individuals from all the ten sampled locations with an average of six heteroplasmic haplotypes per individual. Moreover, they found that some of these heteroplasmic haplotypes are shared between individuals from different locations. This situation regarding heteroplasmy in this study suggested that new studies are needed to prove it. Similarly, after the initial definition of heteroplasmy for