Accesso libero

An Improved Hybrid Path Planning Algorithm in Indoor Environment

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Figure 1.

Raster map model
Raster map model

Figure 2.

A-Star algorithm smoothing processing diagram
A-Star algorithm smoothing processing diagram

Figure 3.

A-Star algorithm path smoothing results in 30×30 environment
A-Star algorithm path smoothing results in 30×30 environment

Figure 4.

Force analysis diagram of mobile robot
Force analysis diagram of mobile robot

Figure 5.

Modified repulsion field parameters force analysis
Modified repulsion field parameters force analysis

Figure 6.

Path planning comparison
Path planning comparison

Figure 7.

Complex obstacle test comparison
Complex obstacle test comparison

Figure 8.

Hybrid algorithm model diagram
Hybrid algorithm model diagram

Figure 9.

Static path comparison diagram
Static path comparison diagram

Figure 10.

Dynamic path planning diagram
Dynamic path planning diagram

Figure 11.

Hands-free robot platform
Hands-free robot platform

Figure 12.

Actual test scenario
Actual test scenario

Figure 13.

Actual scene construction effect
Actual scene construction effect

Figure 14.

A-Star Hybrid DWA algorithm path planning
A-Star Hybrid DWA algorithm path planning

Figure 15.

Improved A-Star hybrid improved artificial potential field algorithm
Improved A-Star hybrid improved artificial potential field algorithm

Algorithm comparison in static environment

Algorithm Path length/m Search time/s Does the algorithm have the ability to handle dynamic obstacles
A-Star 45.36 6.72 No
IAPF 48.00 10.43 Yes
DWA 48.86 28.21 Yes
Hybrid algorithm 46.54 8.14 Yes

Comparison of the effects of A-Star algorithm improvement

Algorithm Path length/m Time for path finding/s Number of expansion nodes Is there a turning point
A-Star 22.42 5.9 166 Yes
Improved A-Star 21.56 5.5 59 No

Results of algorithm comparison in real environment

Path planning algorithm Path length/m Number of nodes passed through Search time/s
A-Star Hybrid DWA 3.66 126 54.42
Hybrid algorithm in this paper 3.24 92 48.36

Comparison results of improved algorithm

Experiment Name Algorithm Path length/m Run time/s Number of cycles
Path planning testing APF 49.970710 6.186677 447
IAPF 48.003037 5.430491 440

Complex obstacle testing APF
IAPF 51.519690 6.801836 451
eISSN:
2470-8038
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Computer Sciences, other