Impeachment in the U. S. Constitution and Practice – Implications for the Czech Constitution

ADAMS, George Burton, STEPHENS, Henry Morse (eds). Select Documents of English Constitutional History. New York: MacMillan, 1901.Search in Google Scholar

ANSON, William Reynell. The Law and Custom of the Constitution. Vol. II: The Crown, Part I. Third Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.Search in Google Scholar

BAUMGARTNER, Jody C., KADA, Naoko. (eds). Checking Executive Power. Presidential Impeachment in Comparative Perspective. Westport: Praeger, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

BERGER, Raoul. Impeachment of Judges and “Good Behavior” Tenure. Yale Law Journal, 1970, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 1475–1531.10.2307/795270Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

BERGER, Raoul. Impeachment for „High Crimes and Misdemeanors“. Southern California Law Review, 1971, vol. 44, pp. 395–460.Search in Google Scholar

BERGER, Raoul. Impeachment: The Constitutional Problems. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

BLACK, Charles Lund. Impeachment: A Handbook. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

BOČEK, Jan, MAZÁK, Jaromír, ZLATKOVSKÝ, Michal. Rozdělená společnost? Čechy proti sobě staví věk a vzdělání.www.rozhlas.cz, 4. 1. 2017, Available at: https://interaktivni.rozhlas.cz/rozdelena-spolecnost/Search in Google Scholar

CHEMERINSKY, Erwin. Constitutional Law. Fourth Edition. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

CLARKE, Maude Violet. The Origin of Impeachment. Oxford Essays in Medieval History, 1934.Search in Google Scholar

DICEY, Albert Venn. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Third Edition. London: MacMillan, 1889.Search in Google Scholar

DOUGHERTY, John Hampden. Inherent Limitations Upon Impeachment. The Yale Law Journal, 1913, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 60–87.10.2307/785534Search in Google Scholar

FENTON, Paul S. The Scope of the Impeachment Power. Northwestern University Law Review, 1970, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 719–758.Search in Google Scholar

FIRMAGE, Edwin Brown, MANGRUM, R. Collin. Removal of the President: Resignation and the Procedural Law of Impeachment. Duke Law Journal, 1974, no. 6, pp. 1023–1116.10.2307/1372032Search in Google Scholar

GERHARDT, Michael J. Putting the Law of Impeachment in Perspective. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 1999, vol. 43, pp. 905–930.Search in Google Scholar

GERHARDT, Michael J. The Historical and Constitutional Significance of the Impeachment and Trial of President Clinton. Hofstra Law Review, 1999, vol. 28, pp. 349–392.Search in Google Scholar

GERHARDT, Michael J. The Lessons of Impeachment History. George Washington Law Review, 1999, vol. 67, pp. 603–625.Search in Google Scholar

GOLDSTEIN, Joel K. Can the Vice President Preside at his Own Impeachment Trial? A Critique of Bare Textualism. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 2000, vol. 44, pp. 849–870.Search in Google Scholar

GORMLEY, Ken. Impeachment and the Independent Counsel: A Dysfunctional Union. Stanford Law Review, 1999, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 309–355.10.2307/1229271Search in Google Scholar

GUNTHER, Gerald. Judicial Hegemony and Legislative Autonomy: The Nixon Case and the Impeachment Process. UCLA Law Review, 1974, vol. 22, pp. 30–39.Search in Google Scholar

HAMILTON, Alexander, MADISON, James, JAY, John. The Federalist Papers. New York: Bantam Dell, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

HOFFER, Peter Charles, HULL, Natalie E. H. Power and Precedent in the Creation of an American Impeachment Tradition: The Eighteenth-Century Colonial Record. The William and Mary Quarterly, 1979, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 51–77.10.2307/1921980Search in Google Scholar

JOHNSON, Charles W., SULLIVAN, John V., WICKHAM, Jr., Thomas J. House Practice: A Guide to the Rules, Precedents, and Procedures of the House. Washington: Government Printing Office, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

KLARMAN, Michael J. Constitutional Fetishism and the Clinton Impeachment Debate. Virginia Law Review, 1999, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 631–659.10.2307/1073883Search in Google Scholar

LIFFLANDER, Matthew L. The Impeachment of Governor Sulzer. A Story of American Politics. New York: SUNY Press, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

MARSHALL, Peter James. The Impeachment of Warren Hastings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.Search in Google Scholar

MORGAN, Charles, EASTMAN, Hope, GALE, Mary Ellen, AREEN, Judith. Impeachment: An Historical Overview. Seton Hall Law Review, 1974, vol. 5, pp. 689–719.Search in Google Scholar

NEUMANN, Richard K. The Revival of Impeachment as a Partisan Political Weapon. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 2007, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 161–327.Search in Google Scholar

RAKOVE, Jack Norman. Statement on the Background and History of Impeachment. George Washington Law Review, 1998–1999, vol. 67, pp. 682–692.Search in Google Scholar

REHNQUIST, William Hubbs. The Impeachment Clause: A Wild Card in the Constitution. Northwestern University Law Review, 1991, vol. 85, pp. 903–918.Search in Google Scholar

ROBERTS, Clayton. The Growth of responsible government in Stuart England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.Search in Google Scholar

ROBERTS, Clayton. The Law of Impeachment in Stuart England: A Reply to Raoul Berger. Yale Law Journal, 1975, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 1419–1439.10.2307/795488Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

ROSKELL, John Smith. The Impeachment of Michael de la Pole Earl of Suffolk in 1386 in the context of the reign of Richard II. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

ROTUNDA, Ronald D. An Essay on the Constitutional Parameters of Federal Impeachment. Kentucky Law Journal, 1987, Vol. 76, pp. 707–732.Search in Google Scholar

TAYLOR, Hannis. The American Law of Impeachment. The North American Review, 1905, vol. 180, no. 581, pp. 502–512.Search in Google Scholar

TURLEY, Jonathan. Congress As Grand Jury: The Role of the House of Representatives in the Impeachment of an American President. George Washington Law Review, 1999, vol. 67, pp. 735–790.Search in Google Scholar

TURLEY, Jonathan. Senate Trials and Factional Disputes: Impeachment as a Madisonian Device. Duke Law Journal, 1999, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–146.10.2307/1373063Search in Google Scholar

ZBÍRAL, Robert. Volání po posílení empirie: Jak (ne)měnit českou Ústavu. Jurisprudence, 2015, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 10–15.Search in Google Scholar

• The Singapore Mediation Convention and International Business Mediation
• The Person of the Arbitrator in Comparative Perspective of Czech and German Law
• UN Treaty on Business and Human Rights or Investor-State Arbitration? A Sober Answer for the Better Protection of Human Rights
• The Significance of the Ultimatum in International Law: The Responsibility of the Head of the USSR for the Events of January 1991 in Lithuania
• Institutions Strengthening the Position of the Injured Party of the Offence of Failure to Pay Alimony under Section 196 of the Czech Criminal Code and in Selected European Legal Regulations
• The Universal Periodic Review and the Special Procedures: Weird Picasso Abstraction or a Thought-Out Drawing?
• Legal Perspectives on Smart City Data as a Commons
• Economic Abuse and Criminal Responsibility: Lithuanian Case Law on Domestic Violence
• The Gaps in the Regulation of Prohibition of Reformatio in Peius in Slovak Administrative Law in Central European Perspective
• Cyber Operations against Critical Financial Infrastructure: a Non-Destructive Armed Attack?
• The increasing role of the Charter when establishing the ‘genuine enjoyment’ test for static EU citizens – A result of the ECHR’s shortcomings?
• International Legal Personality of Transnational Corporations – Any Chance for the Theoretical Shift with Respect to a Legally Binding Instrument on Human Rights and TNCs?
• Personal Data Protection in Brazil: How Much Europeanization?
• “The Right to be Remembered?”: The Contemporary Challenges of the “Streisand Effect” in the European Judicial Reality