Comparativism and the New Hungarian Fundamental Law – Taking Raz Seriously

Annus, Taavi. Comparative Constitutional Reasoning: the Law and Strategy of Selecting the Right Arguments. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 2004, Vol. 14, pp. 301–349.Search in Google Scholar

Az Alaptörvény nem fejez ki közakaratot – interjú Sólyom Lászlóval. [online]. Available at <http://www.ugyvedvilag.hu/rovatok/napirend/az-alaptorveny-nem-fejez-ki-koza-karatot-interju-solyom-laszloval> Accessed 31.03.2016.Search in Google Scholar

Bóka, János. Az összehasonlító módszer alkalmazása az Alkotmánybíróság gyakorlatában. In Ambrus, István, Köblös, Adél, Strihó, Krisztina, Sulyok, Márton, Szalai, Anikó, Trócsányi, László (ed). Dikaiosz logosz – Tanulmányok Kovács István emlékére. Szeged: Pólay Elemér Alapítvány, 2012, pp. 17–26.Search in Google Scholar

Choudhry, Sujit. Globalization in Search of Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation. Indiana Law Journal, 1999, vol. 74, p. 819–892.Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Thomas, Reh, Christine. Constitutionalizing the European Union. China: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, p. 42.10.1007/978-1-137-10281-2Search in Google Scholar

Chronowski, Nóra. Az alkotmánybíráskodás sarkalatos átalakítása. MTA Law Working Papers, No. 2014/8, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Chronowsky, Nóra. Az alkotmányozás a globális alkotmányozás kontextusában. Jura, 2012, Vol. 18, pp. 251–259.Search in Google Scholar

Fleck, Zoltán, Gadó, Gábor, Halmai, Gábor, Hegyi, Szabolcs, Juhász, Gábor, Kis, János, Körtvélyesi, Zsolt, Majtényi, Balázs, Tóth, Gábor Attila. Vélemény Magyarország Alaptörvényéről. Fundamentum, 2011, Vol. 15., pp. 61–77.Search in Google Scholar

Jakab, András, Szilágyi, Emese. Sarkalatos törvények a magyar jogrendben, MTA Law Working Papers, No. 2015/32, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Kilényi, Géza. Az alaptörvény stabilitását szolgáló garanciák a külföldi alkotmányokban és nálunk. Jogtudományi Közlöny, 1996, Vol. 51., p. 110–124.Search in Google Scholar

Küpper, Herbert. Zwischen Staatspaternalismus, Kollektivismus und liberalem Individualismus: Normative Grundlagen des Menschenbilds im neuen ungarischen Grundgesetz. In Csehi, Zoltán, Schanda, Balázs, Sonnevend, Pál (ed). Viva vox iuris – Tanulmányok Sólyom László tiszteletére 70. születésnapja alkalmából. Budapest: Dialóg Campus. 2012, pp. 215–239.Search in Google Scholar

Landau, David. Abusive Constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Review, 2013, Vol. 47, pp. 189–260.Search in Google Scholar

Law, David S., Versteeg, Mila. The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism. California Law Review, 2011, Vol. 99. pp. 1163–1257.10.2139/ssrn.1633108Search in Google Scholar

Majtényi, Balázs. Alaptörvény a nemzet akaratából. Állam – és Jogtudomány, 2014, Vol. 55., pp. 77–96.Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, Ryan O., Ackermann, Kurt A. Theoretical and Measurement Issues in the Study of Social Preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2014, Vol. 18., pp. 13–41.10.1177/1088868313501745Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Opinion on the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary adopted by the Venice Commission at its 95th Plenary Session. Venice, 14–15 June 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Pap, András László. Ki és mi magyar? Az Alaptörvény preferenciái kritikai perspektívából. In Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina, Szente, Zoltán (ed). Alkotmányozás és alkotmányjogi változások Európában és Magyarországon. Budapest: Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem. 2014, pp. 245–263.Search in Google Scholar

Scheppele, Kim Lane. Hungary’s Attacks on the Rule of Law and Why They Matter for Business. Financial Times, February 5, 2014. Available at <http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2014/02/05/guest-post-hungarys-attacks-on-the-rule-of-law-and-why-they-matter-for-business> Accessed 31.03.2016.Search in Google Scholar

Smits, Jan M. Comparative Law and its Influence on National Legal Systems. In Reimann, Mathias – Zimmermann, Reinhard (ed). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 477–512.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.013.0016Search in Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562688.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rehnquist, William H. Foreword. In Jackson, Vicki C., Tushnet, Mark (ed). Defining the Field of Comparative Constitutional Law. Westport-London: Praeger, 2002, pp. vii–ix.Search in Google Scholar

Sulyok, Márton. Értelem és érzelem vagy büszkeség és balítélet? Alkotmánybíráskodás és alkotmányos identitás. Fontes Iuris, 2015, Vol. 1., pp. 27–39.Search in Google Scholar

Trócsányi, László. Az alkotmányozás dilemmái. Budapest: HVG-Orac, 2014Search in Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. The Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law. Virginia Journal of International Law, 2009, Vol. 56, pp. 985–1006.10.2139/ssrn.1317766Search in Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law. The Yale Law Journal, 1999, vol. 108, pp. 1225–1309.10.2307/797327Search in Google Scholar

Vincze, Attila. Az Alkotmánybíróság határozata az Alaptörvény negyedik módosításáról – Az alkotmánymódosítás alkotmánybírósági kontrollja. Jogesetek Magyarázata, Vol. 4., 2013, p. 6.Search in Google Scholar

Weinrib, Lorraine E. Constitutional Conceptions and Constitutional Comparativism. In Jackson, Vicki C., Tushnet, Mark (ed). Defining the Field of Comparative Constitutional Law. Westport-London: Praeger, 2002, pp. 3–33.Search in Google Scholar

• The Singapore Mediation Convention and International Business Mediation
• The Person of the Arbitrator in Comparative Perspective of Czech and German Law
• UN Treaty on Business and Human Rights or Investor-State Arbitration? A Sober Answer for the Better Protection of Human Rights
• The Significance of the Ultimatum in International Law: The Responsibility of the Head of the USSR for the Events of January 1991 in Lithuania
• Institutions Strengthening the Position of the Injured Party of the Offence of Failure to Pay Alimony under Section 196 of the Czech Criminal Code and in Selected European Legal Regulations
• The Universal Periodic Review and the Special Procedures: Weird Picasso Abstraction or a Thought-Out Drawing?
• Legal Perspectives on Smart City Data as a Commons
• Economic Abuse and Criminal Responsibility: Lithuanian Case Law on Domestic Violence
• The Gaps in the Regulation of Prohibition of Reformatio in Peius in Slovak Administrative Law in Central European Perspective
• Cyber Operations against Critical Financial Infrastructure: a Non-Destructive Armed Attack?
• The increasing role of the Charter when establishing the ‘genuine enjoyment’ test for static EU citizens – A result of the ECHR’s shortcomings?
• International Legal Personality of Transnational Corporations – Any Chance for the Theoretical Shift with Respect to a Legally Binding Instrument on Human Rights and TNCs?
• Personal Data Protection in Brazil: How Much Europeanization?
• “The Right to be Remembered?”: The Contemporary Challenges of the “Streisand Effect” in the European Judicial Reality