1. bookVolume 44 (2020): Edizione 1 (March 2020)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1502-5462
Prima pubblicazione
28 Apr 2014
Frequenza di pubblicazione
1 volta all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

Issues and challenges in compiling a corpus of Early Modern English plays for comparison with those of William Shakespeare

Pubblicato online: 12 Mar 2020
Volume & Edizione: Volume 44 (2020) - Edizione 1 (March 2020)
Pagine: 37 - 68
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1502-5462
Prima pubblicazione
28 Apr 2014
Frequenza di pubblicazione
1 volta all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

Archer, Dawn and Derek Bousfield. 2010. ‘See better, Lear’? See Lear better! A corpus-based pragma-stylistic investigation of Shakespeare’s King Lear. In D. McIntyre and B. Busse (eds.). Language and style, 183–203. Basing-toke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-06574-2_12Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Dawn and Jonathan Culpeper. 2003. Sociopragmatic annotation: New directions and possibilities in historical corpus linguistics. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson and A.M. McEnery (eds.). Corpus linguistics by the lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 37–58. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Dawn, Jonathan Culpeper and Paul Rayson. 2009. Love – ‘a familiar or a devil’? An exploration of key domains in Shakespeare’s comedies and tragedies. In D. Archer (ed.). What’s in a word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction, 137–157. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Dawn and Mathew Gillings. In preparation. Depictions of deception, focussing on five Shakespearean characters.Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Dawn, Merja Kytö, Alistair Baron and Paul Rayson. 2015. Guidelines for normalising Early Modern English corpora: Decisions and justifications. ICAME Journal 39 (1): 5–24.10.1515/icame-2015-0001Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul. 2004. Querying keywords. Questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 32 (4): 346–359.10.1177/0075424204269894Search in Google Scholar

Baron, Alistair and Paul Rayson. 2008. VARD 2: A tool for dealing with the spelling variation in historical corpora. In Proceedings of the Postgraduate Conference in Corpus Linguistics, Aston University, Birmingham, U.K., 22 May 2008. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/vard/about/ (accessed 26.09.2019).Search in Google Scholar

Bartels, Emily. 2003. Shakespeare’s view of the world. In S. Wells and L. Cowen Orlin (eds.). Shakespeare. An Oxford guide, 151–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1989. A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27 (1): 3–43.10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3Search in Google Scholar

Braunmuller, Albert. 2003. Shakespeare’s fellow dramatists. In S. Wells and L. Cowen Orlin (eds.). Shakespeare. An Oxford guide, 55–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bray, Tim, Jean Paoli, Michael Sperberg-McQueen, Eve Maler and François Yergeau (eds.). 2008. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. Fifth edition. W3C Recommendation 26 November 2008. https://www.w3.org/XML/ (accessed 26.09.2019).Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Meaghan, Michael Poston and Elizabeth Williamson (eds.). 2020. A digital anthology of Early Modern English drama. Folger Shakespeare Library. http://emed.folger.edu (accessed 26.09.2019).Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18: 159–212.10.1017/S0047404500013464Search in Google Scholar

Busse, Beatrix. 2006. Vocative constructions in the language of Shakespeare. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.150Search in Google Scholar

Busse, Ulrich. 2002. Linguistic variation in the Shakespeare Corpus: Morpho-syntactic variability of second person pronouns. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.106Search in Google Scholar

CED = A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. 2006. Compiled by Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).Search in Google Scholar

Craig, Hugh. 1999. Jonsonian chronology and the styles of A Tale of a Tub. In M. Butler (ed.). Presenting Ben Jonson: Text, history, performance, 210–232. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan U.K.10.1057/9780230376724_11Search in Google Scholar

Craig, Hugh and Arthur Kinney (eds.). 2009. Shakespeare, computers, and the mystery of authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605437Search in Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 2003. The language of Shakespeare. In S. Wells and L. Cowen Orlin (eds.). Shakespeare. An Oxford guide, 67–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 2008. Think on my words. Exploring Shakespeare’s language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755095Search in Google Scholar

Crystal, David and Ben Crystal. 2005. The Shakespeare miscellany. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2009. Keyness: Words, parts-of-speech and semantic categories in the character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (1): 29–59.10.1075/ijcl.14.1.03culSearch in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. A new kind of dictionary for Shakespeare’s plays: An immodest proposal. In M. Ravassat and J. Culpeper (eds.). Stylistics and Shakespeare’s language. Transdisciplinary approaches, 58–83. London/ New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen. 2015. Keywords. In D. Biber and R. Reppen (eds.). The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics, 90–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139764377.006Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan and Alison Findlay. In preparation. Contemporary understandings of Welsh, Scottish and Irish identities: Celtic characters in Shakespeare’s Henry V.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English dialogues: Spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan and Dan McIntyre. 2006. Drama: Stylistic aspects. In K. Brown (ed.). Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Volume 3, 772–785. 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00506-XSearch in Google Scholar

Demmen, Jane. 2016. Smoothing out spelling variation. Blog post 22.10.2016. http://wp.lancs.ac.uk/shakespearelang/2016/10/22/smoothin-out-spelling-variation/ (accessed 26.09.2019).Search in Google Scholar

Demmen, Jane. 2018. Is that a verb I see before me? Implementing grammatical category/part-of-speech tagging in the Shakespeare Corpus. Blog post 20.06.2018. http://wp.lancs.ac.uk/shakespearelang/2018/06/20/is-that-a-verb-i-see-before-me-implementing-grammatical-category-part-of-speech-tagging-in-the-shakespeare-corpus/ (accessed 26.09.2019).Search in Google Scholar

Dillon, Janette. 2003. Shakespeare and the traditions of English stage comedy. In R. Dutton and J.E. Howard (eds.). A companion to Shakespeare’s works. Volume III. The comedies, 4–22. Malden/Oxford/Victoria: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996553.ch2Search in Google Scholar

Dutton, Richard. 1991. Mastering the revels. Basingstoke/London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-09879-8Search in Google Scholar

Dutton, Richard. 2000. Licensing, censorship and authorship in Early Modern England. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230598713Search in Google Scholar

EEBO-TCP = Early English Books Online-Text Creation Partnership. 2020. https://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ (accessed 26.09.2019).Search in Google Scholar

Fischer-Starcke, Bettina. 2009. Keywords and frequent phrases of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. A corpus-stylistic analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (4): 492–523.10.1075/ijcl.14.4.03fisSearch in Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen, Walter Cohen, Suzanne Gossett, Jean Howard, Katherine Eisaman Maus and Gordon McMullan (eds.). 2016. The Norton Shakespeare. 3rd Edition. London/New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Hardie, Andrew. 2012. CQPweb – combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (3): 380–409.10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04harSearch in Google Scholar

Hardie, Andrew. 2014. Modest XML for corpora: Not a standard, but a suggestion. ICAME Journal 38: 73–103.Search in Google Scholar

Helsinki Corpus = The Helsinki Corpus of English texts. 1991. Compiled by Matti Rissanen (Project leader), Merja Kytö (Project secretary); Leena Kahlas-Tarkka and Matti Kilpiö (Old English); Saara Nevanlinna and Irma Taavitsainen (Middle English); Terttu Nevalainen and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English). Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.Search in Google Scholar

Hope, Jonathan. 1994. The authorship of Shakespeare’s plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511518942Search in Google Scholar

Hope, Jonathan. 2010. Shakespeare and language: Reason, eloquence and artifice in the Renaissance. London: Arden Shakespeare.Search in Google Scholar

Hope, Jonathan and Michael Witmore. 2010. The hundredth psalm to the tune of ‘Green Sleeves’: Digital approaches to the language of genre. Shakespeare Quarterly 61 (3): 357–390.10.1353/shq.2010.0002Search in Google Scholar

KEMPE = Korpus of Early Modern Playtexts in English. Initially compiled by Lene B. Petersen and Marcus X. Dahl, in association with Visual Interactive Syntax Learning (VISL), Southern Denmark University (SDU), 2001–2003. The fully searchable version of the corpus was prepared by Lene B. Petersen and Eckhard Bick, July 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Kermode, Frank. 2000. Shakespeare’s language. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Kopytko, Roman. 1995. Linguistic politeness in Shakespeare’s plays. In A.H. Jucker (ed.). Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English, 515–540. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.35.27kopSearch in Google Scholar

Kytö, Merja. 1996 [1991]. Manual to the diachronic part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Coding conventions and lists of source texts. 3rd edition. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.Search in Google Scholar

Kytö, Merja and Terry Walker. 2006. Guide to A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 130). Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, David. 2001. Genres, registers, text types, domains and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning and Technology 5(3): 37–72.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey, Roger Garside and Michael Bryant. 1994. CLAWS 4: The tagging of the British National Corpus. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 94), Kyoto, Japan, 622–628. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/papers/coling1994paper.pdf (accessed 26.09.2019).10.3115/991886.991996Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Carole. 2003. The society of Shakespeare’s England. In S. Wells and L. Cowen Orlin (eds.). Shakespeare. An Oxford guide, 93–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lutzky, Ursula. 2012. Discourse markers in Early Modern English. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.227Search in Google Scholar

Mullan, John. 2016. An introduction to Shakespeare’s comedy. British Library online article published 15.03.2016. https://www.bl.uk/shakespeare/articles/an-introduction-to-shakespeares-comedy (accessed 26.09.2019).Search in Google Scholar

Munro, Lucy. 2005. Children of the Queen’s Revels. A Jacobean theatre repertory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486067Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, Sean. 2017. Shakespeare and social status. Blog post 05.06.2017. http://wp.lancs.ac.uk/shakespearelang/2017/06/05/shakespeare-and-social-status/ (accessed 26.09.2019).Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, Sean. 2019. Shakespeare and his contemporaries: Designing a genre classification scheme for Early English Books Online 1560–1640. ICAME Journal 19: 59–82.10.2478/icame-2019-0003Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, Sean, Jane Demmen, Alison Findlay and Dawn Archer. In preparation. Mapping the links between gender, status and genre in Shakespeare’s plays.Search in Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. 2006. An introduction to Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Orlin, Lena Cowen. 2003. Part II Shakespearean genres: Introduction. In S. Wells and L. Cowen Orlin (eds.). Shakespeare. An Oxford guide, 167–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Petersen, Lena. 2010. Shakespeare’s errant texts. Textual form and linguistic style in Shakespearean ‘bad’ quartos and co-authored plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rayson, Paul, Dawn Archer, Scott Piao and Tony McEnery. 2004. The UCREL semantic analysis system. In Proceedings of the workshop on Beyond Named Entity Recognition Semantic labelling for NLP tasks in association with 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), 25 May 2004, Lisbon, Portugal, 7–12. Paris: European Language Resources Association.Search in Google Scholar

Rayson, Paul. 2008. From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13 (4): 519–549.10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06raySearch in Google Scholar

Rutter, Carol Chillington. 2012. Playing with boys on Middleton’s stage – and ours. In G. Taylor and T.T. Henley (eds.). The Oxford handbook of Thomas Middleton, 98–115. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559886.013.0007Search in Google Scholar

Scott, Mike. 2009. In search of a bad reference corpus. In D. Archer (ed.). What’s in a word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction, 79–91. Oxford: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, Mike and Chris Tribble. 2006. Textual patterns. Key words and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.22Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro, Michael. 2002. Boy companies and private theatres. In A.F. Kinney (ed.). A companion to Renaissance drama, 314–325. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470998922.ch23Search in Google Scholar

Short, Mick. 1996. Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. London/ New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001. Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 139–150.10.1076/ejes.5.2.139.7309Search in Google Scholar

Thomson, Peter. 2003. Conventions of playwriting. In S. Wells and L. Cowen Orlin (eds.). Shakespeare. An Oxford guide, 44–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wells, Stanley, Gary Taylor, John Jowett and William Montgomery. 1987. William Shakespeare: A textual companion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198129141.book.1Search in Google Scholar

Westfall, Suzanne. 2002. “What revels are in hand?” Performances in the great households. In A.F. Kinney (ed.). A companion to Renaissance drama, 266–280. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470998922.ch20Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo