[Archer, Dawn and Derek Bousfield. 2010. ‘See better, Lear’? See Lear better! A corpus-based pragma-stylistic investigation of Shakespeare’s King Lear. In D. McIntyre and B. Busse (eds.). Language and style, 183–203. Basing-toke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-06574-2_12]Search in Google Scholar
[Archer, Dawn and Jonathan Culpeper. 2003. Sociopragmatic annotation: New directions and possibilities in historical corpus linguistics. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson and A.M. McEnery (eds.). Corpus linguistics by the lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 37–58. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Archer, Dawn, Jonathan Culpeper and Paul Rayson. 2009. Love – ‘a familiar or a devil’? An exploration of key domains in Shakespeare’s comedies and tragedies. In D. Archer (ed.). What’s in a word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction, 137–157. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[Archer, Dawn and Mathew Gillings. In preparation. Depictions of deception, focussing on five Shakespearean characters.]Search in Google Scholar
[Archer, Dawn, Merja Kytö, Alistair Baron and Paul Rayson. 2015. Guidelines for normalising Early Modern English corpora: Decisions and justifications. ICAME Journal 39 (1): 5–24.10.1515/icame-2015-0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Baker, Paul. 2004. Querying keywords. Questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 32 (4): 346–359.10.1177/0075424204269894]Search in Google Scholar
[Baron, Alistair and Paul Rayson. 2008. VARD 2: A tool for dealing with the spelling variation in historical corpora. In Proceedings of the Postgraduate Conference in Corpus Linguistics, Aston University, Birmingham, U.K., 22 May 2008. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/vard/about/ (accessed 26.09.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bartels, Emily. 2003. Shakespeare’s view of the world. In S. Wells and L. Cowen Orlin (eds.). Shakespeare. An Oxford guide, 151–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas. 1989. A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27 (1): 3–43.10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3]Search in Google Scholar
[Braunmuller, Albert. 2003. Shakespeare’s fellow dramatists. In S. Wells and L. Cowen Orlin (eds.). Shakespeare. An Oxford guide, 55–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bray, Tim, Jean Paoli, Michael Sperberg-McQueen, Eve Maler and François Yergeau (eds.). 2008. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. Fifth edition. W3C Recommendation 26 November 2008. https://www.w3.org/XML/ (accessed 26.09.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, Meaghan, Michael Poston and Elizabeth Williamson (eds.). 2020. A digital anthology of Early Modern English drama. Folger Shakespeare Library. http://emed.folger.edu (accessed 26.09.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18: 159–212.10.1017/S0047404500013464]Search in Google Scholar
[Busse, Beatrix. 2006. Vocative constructions in the language of Shakespeare. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.150]Search in Google Scholar
[Busse, Ulrich. 2002. Linguistic variation in the Shakespeare Corpus: Morpho-syntactic variability of second person pronouns. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.106]Search in Google Scholar
[CED = A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. 2006. Compiled by Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).]Search in Google Scholar
[Craig, Hugh. 1999. Jonsonian chronology and the styles of A Tale of a Tub. In M. Butler (ed.). Presenting Ben Jonson: Text, history, performance, 210–232. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan U.K.10.1057/9780230376724_11]Search in Google Scholar
[Craig, Hugh and Arthur Kinney (eds.). 2009. Shakespeare, computers, and the mystery of authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605437]Search in Google Scholar
[Crystal, David. 2003. The language of Shakespeare. In S. Wells and L. Cowen Orlin (eds.). Shakespeare. An Oxford guide, 67–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crystal, David. 2008. Think on my words. Exploring Shakespeare’s language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755095]Search in Google Scholar
[Crystal, David and Ben Crystal. 2005. The Shakespeare miscellany. London: Penguin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Culpeper, Jonathan. 2009. Keyness: Words, parts-of-speech and semantic categories in the character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (1): 29–59.10.1075/ijcl.14.1.03cul]Search in Google Scholar
[Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. A new kind of dictionary for Shakespeare’s plays: An immodest proposal. In M. Ravassat and J. Culpeper (eds.). Stylistics and Shakespeare’s language. Transdisciplinary approaches, 58–83. London/ New York: Continuum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen. 2015. Keywords. In D. Biber and R. Reppen (eds.). The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics, 90–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139764377.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Culpeper, Jonathan and Alison Findlay. In preparation. Contemporary understandings of Welsh, Scottish and Irish identities: Celtic characters in Shakespeare’s Henry V.]Search in Google Scholar
[Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English dialogues: Spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Culpeper, Jonathan and Dan McIntyre. 2006. Drama: Stylistic aspects. In K. Brown (ed.). Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Volume 3, 772–785. 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00506-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Demmen, Jane. 2016. Smoothing out spelling variation. Blog post 22.10.2016. http://wp.lancs.ac.uk/shakespearelang/2016/10/22/smoothin-out-spelling-variation/ (accessed 26.09.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Demmen, Jane. 2018. Is that a verb I see before me? Implementing grammatical category/part-of-speech tagging in the Shakespeare Corpus. Blog post 20.06.2018. http://wp.lancs.ac.uk/shakespearelang/2018/06/20/is-that-a-verb-i-see-before-me-implementing-grammatical-category-part-of-speech-tagging-in-the-shakespeare-corpus/ (accessed 26.09.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillon, Janette. 2003. Shakespeare and the traditions of English stage comedy. In R. Dutton and J.E. Howard (eds.). A companion to Shakespeare’s works. Volume III. The comedies, 4–22. Malden/Oxford/Victoria: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996553.ch2]Search in Google Scholar
[Dutton, Richard. 1991. Mastering the revels. Basingstoke/London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-09879-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Dutton, Richard. 2000. Licensing, censorship and authorship in Early Modern England. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230598713]Search in Google Scholar
[EEBO-TCP = Early English Books Online-Text Creation Partnership. 2020. https://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ (accessed 26.09.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer-Starcke, Bettina. 2009. Keywords and frequent phrases of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. A corpus-stylistic analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (4): 492–523.10.1075/ijcl.14.4.03fis]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenblatt, Stephen, Walter Cohen, Suzanne Gossett, Jean Howard, Katherine Eisaman Maus and Gordon McMullan (eds.). 2016. The Norton Shakespeare. 3rd Edition. London/New York: W.W. Norton and Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hardie, Andrew. 2012. CQPweb – combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (3): 380–409.10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har]Search in Google Scholar
[Hardie, Andrew. 2014. Modest XML for corpora: Not a standard, but a suggestion. ICAME Journal 38: 73–103.10.2478/icame-2014-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Helsinki Corpus = The Helsinki Corpus of English texts. 1991. Compiled by Matti Rissanen (Project leader), Merja Kytö (Project secretary); Leena Kahlas-Tarkka and Matti Kilpiö (Old English); Saara Nevanlinna and Irma Taavitsainen (Middle English); Terttu Nevalainen and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English). Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hope, Jonathan. 1994. The authorship of Shakespeare’s plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511518942]Search in Google Scholar
[Hope, Jonathan. 2010. Shakespeare and language: Reason, eloquence and artifice in the Renaissance. London: Arden Shakespeare.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hope, Jonathan and Michael Witmore. 2010. The hundredth psalm to the tune of ‘Green Sleeves’: Digital approaches to the language of genre. Shakespeare Quarterly 61 (3): 357–390.10.1353/shq.2010.0002]Search in Google Scholar
[KEMPE = Korpus of Early Modern Playtexts in English. Initially compiled by Lene B. Petersen and Marcus X. Dahl, in association with Visual Interactive Syntax Learning (VISL), Southern Denmark University (SDU), 2001–2003. The fully searchable version of the corpus was prepared by Lene B. Petersen and Eckhard Bick, July 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kermode, Frank. 2000. Shakespeare’s language. London: Penguin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kopytko, Roman. 1995. Linguistic politeness in Shakespeare’s plays. In A.H. Jucker (ed.). Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English, 515–540. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.35.27kop]Search in Google Scholar
[Kytö, Merja. 1996 [1991]. Manual to the diachronic part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Coding conventions and lists of source texts. 3rd edition. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kytö, Merja and Terry Walker. 2006. Guide to A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 130). Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, David. 2001. Genres, registers, text types, domains and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning and Technology 5(3): 37–72.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leech, Geoffrey, Roger Garside and Michael Bryant. 1994. CLAWS 4: The tagging of the British National Corpus. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 94), Kyoto, Japan, 622–628. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/papers/coling1994paper.pdf (accessed 26.09.2019).10.3115/991886.991996]Search in Google Scholar
[Levin, Carole. 2003. The society of Shakespeare’s England. In S. Wells and L. Cowen Orlin (eds.). Shakespeare. An Oxford guide, 93–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lutzky, Ursula. 2012. Discourse markers in Early Modern English. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.227]Search in Google Scholar
[Mullan, John. 2016. An introduction to Shakespeare’s comedy. British Library online article published 15.03.2016. https://www.bl.uk/shakespeare/articles/an-introduction-to-shakespeares-comedy (accessed 26.09.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Munro, Lucy. 2005. Children of the Queen’s Revels. A Jacobean theatre repertory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486067]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy, Sean. 2017. Shakespeare and social status. Blog post 05.06.2017. http://wp.lancs.ac.uk/shakespearelang/2017/06/05/shakespeare-and-social-status/ (accessed 26.09.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy, Sean. 2019. Shakespeare and his contemporaries: Designing a genre classification scheme for Early English Books Online 1560–1640. ICAME Journal 19: 59–82.10.2478/icame-2019-0003]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy, Sean, Jane Demmen, Alison Findlay and Dawn Archer. In preparation. Mapping the links between gender, status and genre in Shakespeare’s plays.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevalainen, Terttu. 2006. An introduction to Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Orlin, Lena Cowen. 2003. Part II Shakespearean genres: Introduction. In S. Wells and L. Cowen Orlin (eds.). Shakespeare. An Oxford guide, 167–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Petersen, Lena. 2010. Shakespeare’s errant texts. Textual form and linguistic style in Shakespearean ‘bad’ quartos and co-authored plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rayson, Paul, Dawn Archer, Scott Piao and Tony McEnery. 2004. The UCREL semantic analysis system. In Proceedings of the workshop on Beyond Named Entity Recognition Semantic labelling for NLP tasks in association with 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), 25 May 2004, Lisbon, Portugal, 7–12. Paris: European Language Resources Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rayson, Paul. 2008. From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13 (4): 519–549.10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray]Search in Google Scholar
[Rutter, Carol Chillington. 2012. Playing with boys on Middleton’s stage – and ours. In G. Taylor and T.T. Henley (eds.). The Oxford handbook of Thomas Middleton, 98–115. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559886.013.0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, Mike. 2009. In search of a bad reference corpus. In D. Archer (ed.). What’s in a word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction, 79–91. Oxford: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, Mike and Chris Tribble. 2006. Textual patterns. Key words and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.22]Search in Google Scholar
[Shapiro, Michael. 2002. Boy companies and private theatres. In A.F. Kinney (ed.). A companion to Renaissance drama, 314–325. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470998922.ch23]Search in Google Scholar
[Short, Mick. 1996. Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. London/ New York: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001. Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 139–150.10.1076/ejes.5.2.139.7309]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomson, Peter. 2003. Conventions of playwriting. In S. Wells and L. Cowen Orlin (eds.). Shakespeare. An Oxford guide, 44–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wells, Stanley, Gary Taylor, John Jowett and William Montgomery. 1987. William Shakespeare: A textual companion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198129141.book.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Westfall, Suzanne. 2002. “What revels are in hand?” Performances in the great households. In A.F. Kinney (ed.). A companion to Renaissance drama, 266–280. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470998922.ch20]Search in Google Scholar