[Bělka L (2015) TREx – a New Multinational Project of the Elevation Data Production. Vojenský geografický obzor 58(2): 9–11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns R., Jones J (2016) Restoring the power and purpose of the NATO alliance. Brent Snowcroft Center on international security.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bortl D (2014) Looking Back on the Action of Geospatial Military Specialists in the Province Reconstruction Team (PRT) Logar, Afghanistan. Vojenský geografický obzor 1/2014: 3–8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Centrum doktrín Velitelství výcviku – Vojenské akademie (2016) Pub-28-68-03: Geografické zabezpečení operací. Vojenská doktrína. Vyškov, Česká republika – Ministerstvo obrany.10.37544/0720-5953-2016-03-28]Search in Google Scholar
[George J, Sandler T (2018) Demand for military spending in NATO, 1968–2015: A spatial panel approach. European Journal of Political Economy 53: 222-236.10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.09.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Kopecký R, Stránský J (2013) Application „Mapy AČR “. Vojenský geografický obzor 56(2): 13–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovařík V (2016) Geografické zabezpečení Tvorba rychlých mapových výstupů. University of defence. UNOB, Brno.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marša J (2010) Geospatial support of the NATO strategic command. Vojenské rozhledy 19(3): 116–126.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marša, J (2014) Long term objectives of geographical support of the Ministry of defence resort and their realisation, ArcRevue 4/2014: 4–7.]Search in Google Scholar
[Multinational Geospatial Support Group (2017) NU_MNGSG-CONOPS. Euskirchen, Geoservice Bundeswehr.]Search in Google Scholar
[Multinational Geospatial Support Group (2018) NU_MNGSG-Aerodrome-Survey-Obstacle data collection objects, version 0.93. Euskirchen, Geoservice Bundeswehr.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nation Master. NATO Countries. Available at: https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/groups/NATO-countries, [cit. 30.1.2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[Rada J (2018) Analysis of quality of geospatial support in foreign missions. Vojenské rozhledy 27(2): 71-82.10.3849/2336-2995.27.2018.02.71-82]Search in Google Scholar
[Rada J (2017) Current trend in geospatial support in mission KFOR. Vojenský geografický obzor 2/2017: 25–33.]Search in Google Scholar
[NATO Military Agency for Standardization (1979) STANAG 3600: Topographical Land Maps and Aeronautical Charts 1:250,000 for Joint Operations, Edition 3. NATO, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[NATO Standardization Agency (2013) STANAG 2586: NATO Geospatial Metadata Profile, Edition 1. NSA, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[NATO Standardization Office (2016) STANAG 2211: Geodetic Datums, Projections, Grids and Grid References, Edition 7. NSO, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[NATO Standardization Office (2014) STANAG 2592: NATO Geospatial Information Framework (NGIF), Edition 1. NSO, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[NATO Standardization Office (2016) AJP 3.17: Allied Joint Doctrine for Geospatial Support. NSO, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[NATO Standardization Office (2016) STANAG 2599: Allied Joint Doctrine for Geospatial Support, Edition 1. NSO, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[NATO Standardization Office (2017) MC 296/3: NATO Geospatial Policy. NSO, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[Statista, Number of military personnel in NATO countries in 2018. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/584286/number-of-military-personnel-in-nato-countries/, [cit. 30.1.2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[Wildmann R, Bělka L, Kotlář V (2009) Production of foreign territory maps: MGCP Derived Graphics. ArcRevue 2009/3.]Search in Google Scholar
