Accesso libero

Minimization of Process and Wastewater Load in a Low-Pressure Environment through Vacuum Application for Fiber-Based Materials: Leather and Cotton Products

, , , , ,  e   
28 mag 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita
Scarica la copertina

Fig. 2.

Visuals of a vacuum leather production drum (pressure/vacuum tanks, vacuum pump, rotary drum/reaction medium, control panel) and schematic diagram of the experimental system
Visuals of a vacuum leather production drum (pressure/vacuum tanks, vacuum pump, rotary drum/reaction medium, control panel) and schematic diagram of the experimental system

Fig. 3.

Chemical dosing unit, and the set-up between the drum and dosing unit
Chemical dosing unit, and the set-up between the drum and dosing unit

Fig. 4.

Opened collagen matrix by vacuum and full dyeing of leather
Opened collagen matrix by vacuum and full dyeing of leather

Fig. 5.

Residual floats of conventional dyeing (left) and vacuum dyeing (right)
Residual floats of conventional dyeing (left) and vacuum dyeing (right)

Fig. 1.

Visuals of a vacuum leather production drum (pressure/vacuum tanks, vacuum pump, rotary drum/reaction medium, control panel) and schematic diagram of the experimental system
Visuals of a vacuum leather production drum (pressure/vacuum tanks, vacuum pump, rotary drum/reaction medium, control panel) and schematic diagram of the experimental system

Leather and float analyses after conventional dyeing process

Process Dyestuff float exhaustion (%) Color strength on leather after dyeing (K/S)
Conventional dyeing process 71.18 ± 3.28 12.36 ± 0.57

Conventional dyeing recipe

Process % Substances Temperature (°C) Time (min.) Remarks
Dyeing 100 Water 40
2 Dye auxiliary 30
5 Dyestuff 60
1 Formic acid 40 pH: 4.0
Drain-Washing-Horsing-Mechanical operations

Results of leather dyeing with metal complex dyestuff and cotton dyeing carried out in a conventional and vacuum cabinet

Process Float exhaustion (%) Color strength (K/S)
Conventional system (metal complex dye, leather) 74.05 ± 4.47 14.81 ± 3.35
Vacuum system (metal complex dye, leather) 96.79 ± 2.24 15.23 ± 0.74
Conventional system (hypericum dye, cotton) 92.21 ± 1.93 6.91 ± 1.23
Vacuum system (hypericum dye, cotton) 98.76 ± 2.01 7.06 ± 1.19

Rubbing fastness values of dyed samples

Process Rub fastness
Conventional system (acid dye, leather) 4/5
Conventional system (metal complex dye, leather) 4/5
Conventional system (hypericum dye, cotton) 4
Vacuum system (acid dye) 4/5
Vacuum system (metal complex dye) 4/5
Vacuum system (hypericum dye, cotton) 4

Composition and identification of cotton sample

Yarn number in warp Yarn number in weft Fabric composition Interlacing
68/1 68/1 - 100%c 5/2

Leather and float analyses after dyeing processes carried out in a vacuum cabinet in dependence on water usage ratios

Process Float exhaustion (%) Color strength on leather (K/S)
80% water use 92.15 ± 1.47 20.36 ± 1.61
50% water use 91.45 ± 1.77 19.20 ± 1.13
25% water use 90.32 ± 2.63 18.78 ± 2.05
Free of water use (only dissolving water) 86.56 ± 2.82 16.45 ± 1.16

Leather dyeing recipe under vacuum

Process % Substances Temp. (°C) Time (min.) Remarks
Dyeing A Water 40 A1-A4
2 Dye auxiliary 30
B Dyestuff C B1-B4, C1-C3
1 HCOOH 40 pH: 4.0
Drain-Wash-Horsing-Mechanics

Leather and bath analyses after dyeing processes carried out in a vacuum cabinet in dependence on dyestuff usage ratios

Process Float exhaustion (%) Color strength on leather (K/S)
4% dyestuff 94.02 ± 2.42 15.49 ± 1.90
3.5% dyestuff 95.25 ± 2.91 12.41 ± 1.29
3% dyestuff 93.35 ± 4.30 11.32 ± 1.37
2.5% dyestuff 92.86 ± 3.19 9.45 ± 0.76

Leather and float analyses after dyeing processes carried out in a vacuum drum in dependence on the process time

Process Float exhaustion (%) Color strength on leather (K/S)
45 mins 94.05 ± 2.87 15.18 ± 1.52
30 mins 92.02 ± 1.96 12.38 ± 2.39
15 mins 80.11 ± 3.69 10.77 ± 1.10