This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Council Directive (EU) 2019/904 of 5 June 2019 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment. Available from: https://eurlex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/904/oj.Available from: https://eurlex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/904/oj.Search in Google Scholar
PlasticEurope. Plastic – the facts 2020. An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data, [Internet]; 2020 [cited 2022 Feb]; Available from: https://plasticseurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Plastics_the_facts-WEB-2020_versionJun21_final.pdfPlasticEurope2020[cited 2022 Feb]; Available from: https://plasticseurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Plastics_the_facts-WEB-2020_versionJun21_final.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Alavi S, Thomas S, Sandeep KP, Kalarikkal N, Varghese J, Yaragalla S. Polymers for Packaging Applications. USA: CRC Press; 2014.AlaviSThomasSSandeepKPKalarikkalNVargheseJYaragallaSUSACRC Press201410.1201/b17388Search in Google Scholar
Ivonkovic A, Zeljko K, Talic S, Lasic M. Biodegradable Packaging in the Food Industry. J. Food Saf. Food Qual. 2017; 68(2): 26–38.IvonkovicAZeljkoKTalicSLasicMBiodegradable Packaging in the Food Industry20176822638Search in Google Scholar
Moustafa H, Darwish NA, Nour MA, Youssef AM. Biodegradable Date Stones Filler for Enhancing Mechanical, Dynamic, and Flame Retardant Properties of Polyamide-6 Biocomposites. Polym. Compos. 2018; 39(6): 1978–1987.MoustafaHDarwishNANourMAYoussefAMBiodegradable Date Stones Filler for Enhancing Mechanical, Dynamic, and Flame Retardant Properties of Polyamide-6 Biocomposites20183961978198710.1002/pc.24157Search in Google Scholar
Moustafa H, Youssef AM, Darwish NA, Abou-Kandil AI. Eco-Friendly Polymer Composites for Green Packaging: Future Vision And Challenges. Compos B Eng. 2019; 172: 16.MoustafaHYoussefAMDarwishNAAbou-KandilAIEco-Friendly Polymer Composites for Green Packaging: Future Vision And Challenges20191721610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.048Search in Google Scholar
Draskovic N. Packaging Convenience: Consumer Packaging Feature or Marketing Tool. IJMC 2010; 12(2): 267–274.DraskovicNPackaging Convenience: Consumer Packaging Feature or Marketing Tool201012226727410.5848/APBJ.2010.00061Search in Google Scholar
Galil BS, Genovesi P, Ojaveer H, Quílez-Badia G, Occhipinti A. Mislabeled: Eco-Labeling an Invasive Alien Shellfish Fishery. Biol. Invasions 2013; 15(11): 2363–2365.GalilBSGenovesiPOjaveerHQuílez-BadiaGOcchipintiAMislabeled: Eco-Labeling an Invasive Alien Shellfish Fishery201315112363236510.1007/s10530-013-0460-9Search in Google Scholar
D'Souza C, Taghian M, Lamb P. An Empirical Study on the Influence of Environmental Labels on Consumers. CCIJ 2006; 11(2): 162–173.D'SouzaCTaghianMLambPAn Empirical Study on the Influence of Environmental Labels on Consumers200611216217310.1108/13563280610661697Search in Google Scholar
Van Amstel M, Driessen P, Glasbergen P. Eco-Labeling And Information Asymmetry: A Comparison of Five Eco-Labels in the Netherlands. J. Clean. Prod. 2008; 16(3): 263–276.Van AmstelMDriessenPGlasbergenPEco-Labeling And Information Asymmetry: A Comparison of Five Eco-Labels in the Netherlands200816326327610.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.039Search in Google Scholar
Campbell-Johnston K, de Munck M, Vermeulen WJ, Backes C. Future Perspectives on the Role of Extended Producer Responsibility within a Circular Economy: A Delphi Study Using the Case of the Netherlands. Bus Strategy Environ. 2021; 30(8): 4054–4067.Campbell-JohnstonKde MunckMVermeulenWJBackesCFuture Perspectives on the Role of Extended Producer Responsibility within a Circular Economy: A Delphi Study Using the Case of the Netherlands20213084054406710.1002/bse.2856Search in Google Scholar
Katowice City Hall, Department of Environmental Design, Eco-labels - it's worth getting to know them (in Polish) [Internet], Katowice (POL): Urząd Miasta Katowice, [cited 2022 Feb], Available from: https://odpady.katowice.eu/ekoznaki-warto-je-poznac/.Katowice City HallKatowice (POL): Urząd Miasta Katowice, [cited 2022 Feb], Available from: https://odpady.katowice.eu/ekoznaki-warto-je-poznac/.Search in Google Scholar
Brécard D. Consumer Confusion Over the Profusion of Eco-Labels: Lessons from a Double Differentiation Model. Resour Energy Econ 2014; 37: 64–84.BrécardDConsumer Confusion Over the Profusion of Eco-Labels: Lessons from a Double Differentiation Model201437648410.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.10.002Search in Google Scholar
Thøgersen J, Haugaard P, Olesen A. Consumer Responses to Ecolabels. Eur J Mark. 2010; 44: 1787–1810.ThøgersenJHaugaardPOlesenAConsumer Responses to Ecolabels2010441787181010.1108/03090561011079882Search in Google Scholar
Moon SJ, Costello JP, Koo DM. The Impact of Consumer Confusion from Eco-Labels on Negative WOM, Distrust, and Dissatisfaction. Int J Advert 2017; 36(2): 246–271.MoonSJCostelloJPKooDMThe Impact of Consumer Confusion from Eco-Labels on Negative WOM, Distrust, and Dissatisfaction201736224627110.1080/02650487.2016.1158223Search in Google Scholar
Harbaugh R, Maxwell J-W, Roussillon B. Label Confusion: The Groucho Effect of Uncertain Standards. Manage Sci 2011; 57(9): 1512–1527.HarbaughRMaxwellJ-WRoussillonBLabel Confusion: The Groucho Effect of Uncertain Standards20115791512152710.1287/mnsc.1110.1412Search in Google Scholar
Carlsson F, García JH, Löfgren Å. Conformity and the Demand for Environmental Goods. Environ Resour Econ 2010; 47(3): 407–421.CarlssonFGarcíaJHLöfgrenÅConformity and the Demand for Environmental Goods201047340742110.1007/s10640-010-9385-2Search in Google Scholar
Maniatis P. Investigating Factors Influencing Consumer Decision-Making while Choosing Green Products. J Clean Prod 2016; 132: 215–228.ManiatisPInvestigating Factors Influencing Consumer Decision-Making while Choosing Green Products201613221522810.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.067Search in Google Scholar
Georgakarakou C, Riskos K, Tsourvakas G, Yfantidou I. What Features of Green Products Packaging are More Eye Catching? An Eye-Tracking Exploratory Study about Organic Agricultural Products. Int. J. Technol. Mark. 2020; 14: 93–124.GeorgakarakouCRiskosKTsourvakasGYfantidouIWhat Features of Green Products Packaging are More Eye Catching? An Eye-Tracking Exploratory Study about Organic Agricultural Products2020149312410.1504/IJTMKT.2020.110124Search in Google Scholar
Taufique KR, Siwar C, Chamhuri N. Factors Affecting Consumers' Perception of Eco-Labels: Evidence from Malaysia. In Proceedings of the Australia-Middle East Conference on Business and Social Sciences 2016, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.TaufiqueKRSiwarCChamhuriNInProceedings of the Australia-Middle East Conference on Business and Social Sciences 2016Dubai, United Arab EmiratesSearch in Google Scholar
Crespi JM, Marette S. Eco-Labelling Economics: Is Public Involvement Necessary. Environment, information and consumer behawior 2005; 93–110.CrespiJMMaretteSEco-Labelling Economics: Is Public Involvement Necessary200593110Search in Google Scholar
Lindh H, Olsson A, Williams H. Consumer Perceptions of Food Packaging: Contributing to or Counteracting Environmentally Sustainable Development? Packag. Technol. Sci. 2016; 29: 3–23.LindhHOlssonAWilliamsHConsumer Perceptions of Food Packaging: Contributing to or Counteracting Environmentally Sustainable Development?20162932310.1002/pts.2184Search in Google Scholar
Lindh H, Williams H, Olsson A, Wikström F. Elucidating the Indirect Contributions of Packaging to Sustainable Development: A Terminology of Packaging Functions and Features. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2016; 29: 225–246.LindhHWilliamsHOlssonAWikströmFElucidating the Indirect Contributions of Packaging to Sustainable Development: A Terminology of Packaging Functions and Features20162922524610.1002/pts.2197Search in Google Scholar
Nordin N, Selke S. Social Aspect of Sustainable Packaging. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2010; 23: 317–326.NordinNSelkeSSocial Aspect of Sustainable Packaging20102331732610.1002/pts.899Search in Google Scholar
Steenis ND, van Herpen E, van der Lans IA, Ligthart TN, van Trijp HCM. Consumer Response to Packaging Design: The Role of Packaging Materials and Graphics in Sustainability Perceptions and Product Evaluations. J. Clean. Prod. 2017; 162: 286–298.SteenisNDvan HerpenEvan der LansIALigthartTNvan TrijpHCMConsumer Response to Packaging Design: The Role of Packaging Materials and Graphics in Sustainability Perceptions and Product Evaluations201716228629810.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.036Search in Google Scholar
Wei S, Ang T, Jancenelle VE. Willingness to Pay More for Green Products: The Interplay of Consumer Characteristics and Customer Participation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018; 45: 230–238.WeiSAngTJancenelleVEWillingness to Pay More for Green Products: The Interplay of Consumer Characteristics and Customer Participation20184523023810.1016/j.jretconser.2018.08.015Search in Google Scholar
Biswas A, Roy M. A Study of Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Green Products. JOAMS 2016; 4(3): 211–214.BiswasARoyMA Study of Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Green Products20164321121410.12720/joams.4.3.211-215Search in Google Scholar
Moon W, Florkowski W, Bruckner B, Schonhof I. Willingness to Pay for Environmental Practices: Implications for Eco-Labeling. Land Econ. 2002; 75(1): 88–102.MoonWFlorkowskiWBrucknerBSchonhofIWillingness to Pay for Environmental Practices: Implications for Eco-Labeling20027518810210.2307/3146925Search in Google Scholar
Gerrard C, Janssen M, Smith L, Hamm U, Padel S. UK Consumer Reactions to Green Certification Logos. Br Food J. 2013; 115(5): 727 – 742.GerrardCJanssenMSmithLHammUPadelSUK Consumer Reactions to Green Certification Logos2013115572774210.1108/00070701311331517Search in Google Scholar
Mobile Institute. Green generation 2021. Together for the land, report (in Polish), [Internet]; 2021 [cited 2022 Feb]; Available from: https://s.mobileinstitute.eu/pub/429be3e5cbfd899f894d5d-86b453e6eca92750d9/GreenGeneration_WspolnieNaRzeczZiemi_2021.pdfMobile Institute2021[cited 2022 Feb]; Available from: https://s.mobileinstitute.eu/pub/429be3e5cbfd899f894d5d-86b453e6eca92750d9/GreenGeneration_WspolnieNaRzeczZiemi_2021.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
SW Research. Ecobarometer. On the road to a green society (in Polish), [Internet]; 2021 [cited 2022 Feb]; Available from: https://swresearch.pl/raporty/ekobarometr-pelna-wersja-raportu-ztrzeciego-pomiaruSW Research2021[cited 2022 Feb]; Available from: https://swresearch.pl/raporty/ekobarometr-pelna-wersja-raportu-ztrzeciego-pomiaruSearch in Google Scholar
Kantar. Earthlings design, supplement to report Earthlings attack. (in Polish), [Internet]; 2020 [cited 2022 Feb]; Available at: https://ziemianieatakuja.pl/Kantar2020[cited 2022 Feb]; Available at: https://ziemianieatakuja.pl/Search in Google Scholar
The Eco Gender Gap: 71% of Women try to live more ethically, compared to 59% of men. Mintel July 27th, 2018. Available from: https://www.mintel.com/press-centre/social-and-lifestyle/the-eco-gender-gap-71-of-women-try-to-live-more-ethically-compared-to-59-of-menMintel July 27th, 2018. Available from: https://www.mintel.com/press-centre/social-and-lifestyle/the-eco-gender-gap-71-of-women-try-to-live-more-ethically-compared-to-59-of-menSearch in Google Scholar
Swim JK, Gillis AJ, Hamaty KJ. Gender Bending and Gender Conformity : The Social Consequences of Engaging in Feminine and Masculine Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Sex Roles. 2020; 82(5–6): 363–385.SwimJKGillisAJHamatyKJGender Bending and Gender Conformity : The Social Consequences of Engaging in Feminine and Masculine Pro-Environmental Behaviors2020825–636338510.1007/s11199-019-01061-9Search in Google Scholar
Hunter LM, Hatch A, Johnson A. Cross-National Gender Variation In Environmental Behaviourrs. Soc. Sci. Q. 2004; 85(3): 677–694.HunterLMHatchAJohnsonACross-National Gender Variation In Environmental Behaviourrs200485367769410.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.xSearch in Google Scholar
Dąbrowski A. The Economics of Responsibility. A culture of (In) responsibility. (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 2021.DąbrowskiAWarszawaWydawnictwo Naukowe PWN2021Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. Eco-labels, success stories, Olaf Tschimpke, President of NABU – The Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/green-week-2.htmlEuropean CommissionAvailable from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/green-week-2.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Roberts JA, Bacon DR. Exploring the Subtle Relationships Between Environmental Concern and Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior. J. Bus. Res. 1997; 40:79–89.RobertsJABaconDRExploring the Subtle Relationships Between Environmental Concern and Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior199740798910.1016/S0148-2963(96)00280-9Search in Google Scholar
Taufique KMR, Vocino A, Polonsky MJ. The Influence of Eco-Label Knowledge and Trust on Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviourr in an Emerging Market. J. Strateg. Mark. 2017; 25: 511–529.TaufiqueKMRVocinoAPolonskyMJThe Influence of Eco-Label Knowledge and Trust on Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviourr in an Emerging Market20172551152910.1080/0965254X.2016.1240219Search in Google Scholar
Cheung MF, To WM. An Extended Model of Value-Attitude-Behavior to Explain Chinese Consumers' Green Purchase Behavior. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019; 50: 145–153.CheungMFToWMAn Extended Model of Value-Attitude-Behavior to Explain Chinese Consumers' Green Purchase Behavior20195014515310.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.006Search in Google Scholar
Vermeir I, Verbeke W. Sustainable Food Consumption Among Young Adults in Belgium: Theory of Planned Behaviourr and the Role of Confidence and Values. Ecol. Econ. 2008; 64: 542–553.VermeirIVerbekeWSustainable Food Consumption Among Young Adults in Belgium: Theory of Planned Behaviourr and the Role of Confidence and Values20086454255310.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.007Search in Google Scholar
Wu S-I, Chen J-Y. A Model of Green Consumption Behavior Constructed by the Theory of Planned Behavior. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2014; 6: 119.WuS-IChenJ-YA Model of Green Consumption Behavior Constructed by the Theory of Planned Behavior2014611910.5539/ijms.v6n5p119Search in Google Scholar
Claudy MC, Peterson M, O'driscoll A. Understanding the Attitude-Behavior Gap for Renewable Energy Systems Using Behavioral Reasoning Theory. J. Macromark. 2013; 33: 273–287.ClaudyMCPetersonMO'driscollAUnderstanding the Attitude-Behavior Gap for Renewable Energy Systems Using Behavioral Reasoning Theory20133327328710.1177/0276146713481605Search in Google Scholar
Zhang Y, Bai X, Mills FP, Pezzey JCV. Examining the Attitude-Behavior Gap in Residential Energy Use: Empirical Evidence from A Large-Scale Survey In Beijing, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021; 295:126510.ZhangYBaiXMillsFPPezzeyJCVExamining the Attitude-Behavior Gap in Residential Energy Use: Empirical Evidence from A Large-Scale Survey In Beijing, China202129512651010.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126510Search in Google Scholar
Song Y, Qin Z, Yuan Q. The Impact of Eco-Label on the Young Chinese Generation: The Mediation Role of Environmental Awareness and Product Attributes in Green Purchase. Sustainability 2019; 11: 973.SongYQinZYuanQThe Impact of Eco-Label on the Young Chinese Generation: The Mediation Role of Environmental Awareness and Product Attributes in Green Purchase20191197310.3390/su11040973Search in Google Scholar
Iraldo F, Griesshammer R, Kahlenborn W. The Future of Ecolabels. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2020; 25:833–839.IraldoFGriesshammerRKahlenbornWThe Future of Ecolabels20202583383910.1007/s11367-020-01741-9Search in Google Scholar
Brécard D. Consumer Misperception of Eco-Labels, Green Market Structure and Welfare. J Regul Econ. 2017; 51(3):340–364.BrécardDConsumer Misperception of Eco-Labels, Green Market Structure and Welfare201751334036410.1007/s11149-017-9328-8Search in Google Scholar