The Dilemmas of Public Vs. Private Goods Discounting for Long-Term Investment Appraisal: The Puzzle of Citizen and Consumer Approaches to Valuation

Almansa, C., Martínez-Paz, J.M. (2011). What weight should be assigned to future environmental impacts? A probabilistic cost benefit analysis using recent advances on discounting. Science of the Total Environment, 409 (7), 1305–1314. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.004.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Bateman, I.J., Day, B.H., Georgiou, S., Lake, I. (2006). The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecological Pconomics, 60 (2), 450–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003Search in Google Scholar

Baumol, W.J. (1968). On the social rate of discount. The American Economic Review, 58 (4), 788–802.Search in Google Scholar

Berry, M.S., Nickerson, N.P., Odum, A.L. (2017). Delay discounting as an index of sustainable behavior: devaluation of future air quality and implications for public health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14 (9), 997. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14090997.10.3390/ijerph14090997Search in Google Scholar

Bleichrodt, H., Gao, Y., Rohde, K.I. (2016). A measurement of decreasing impatience for health and money. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 52 (3), 213–231. DOI: 10.1007/s11166-016-9240-0.10.1007/s11166-016-9240-0Search in Google Scholar

Boyle, K.J. (2017). Contingent valuation in practice. In: P.A. Champ, K.J. Boyle, T.C. Brown (eds.) A primer on nonmarket valuation (pp. 83–131). Springer: Dordrecht. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8_4.10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8_4Search in Google Scholar

Chapman, G.B. (2001). Time preferences for the very long term. Acta Psychologica, 108 (2), 95–116. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00030-0.10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00030-0Search in Google Scholar

Cropper, M.L., Aydede, S.K., Portney, P.R. (1994). Preferences for life saving programs: how the public discounts time and age. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8 (3), 243–265. DOI: 10.1007/bf01064044.10.1007/BF01064044Search in Google Scholar

Foltyn-Zarychta, M. (2012). Biases in Contingent Valuation Method Used for Investment Project Appraisal. In: P. Cervinek (ed.), European Financial Systems (pp. 45–50). Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.Search in Google Scholar

Foltyn-Zarychta, M. (2018). Ocena inwestycji międzypokoleniowych – kryteria etyczne w ekonomicznej ocenie efektywności projektów inwestycyjnych. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Foltyn-Zarychta, M., Zerbe, R.O. (2019). The Economics of CSR: the role of citizen-consumer mix in the social responsible investing. In: M. Castellaneta, F. Vessia (eds.), La Responsabilità Sociale D’Impresa Tra Diritto Societario E Diritto Internazionale. Serie VI, n. 175, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane (pp. 81–114). Napoli: Università Degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza Pubblicazioni.Search in Google Scholar

Frederick, S. (2003). Measuring intergenerational time preference: Are future lives valued less? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26 (1), 39–53. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022298223127.10.1023/A:1022298223127Search in Google Scholar

Hanley, N., Schläpfer, F., Spurgeon, J. (2003). Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values. Journal of Environmental Management, 68 (3), 297–304. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4797(03)00084-7.10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00084-7Search in Google Scholar

Hardisty, D.J., Weber, E.U. (2009). Discounting future green: money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138 (3), 329. DOI: 10.1037/a0016433.10.1037/a0016433Search in Google Scholar

Heal, G. (1997). Discounting and climate change. Climatic Change, 37 (2), 335–343.10.1023/A:1005384629724Search in Google Scholar

Howley, P., Hynes, S., O’Donoghue, C. (2010). The citizen versus consumer distinction: an exploration of individuals’ preferences in contingent valuation studies. Ecological Economics, 69 (7), 1524–1531. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.012.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.012Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, R.J., Besedin, E.Y., Holland, B.M. (2019). Modelling distance decay within valuation meta-analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 72 (3), 657–690. DOI: 10.1007/s10640-018-0218-z.10.1007/s10640-018-0218-zSearch in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, S.L., Olsen, S.B., Ladenburg, J., Martinsen, L., Svenningsen, S.R., Hasler, B. (2013). Spatially induced disparities in users’ and non-users’ WTP for water quality improvements—Testing the effect of multiple substitutes and distance decay. Ecological Economics, 92, 58–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.015.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.015Search in Google Scholar

Lazo, J.K., McClelland, G.H., Schulze, W.D. (1997). Economic theory and psychology of nonuse values. Land Economics, 358–371. DOI: 10.2307/3147173.10.2307/3147173Search in Google Scholar

Lewinsohn-Zamir, D. (1998). Consumer preferences, citizen preferences, and the provision of public goods. The Yale Law Journal, 108 (2), 377–406. DOI: 10.2307/797478.10.2307/797478Search in Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (2), 573–597. DOI: 10.2307/2118482.10.2307/2118482Search in Google Scholar

Luckert, M.K., Adamowicz, W.L. (1993). Empirical measures of factors affecting social rates of discount. Environmental and Resource Economics, 3 (1), 1–21. DOI: 10.1007/bf00338317.10.1007/BF00338317Search in Google Scholar

Lumley, S. (1997). The environment and the ethics of discounting: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 20 (1), 71–82. DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(96)00073-0.10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00073-0Search in Google Scholar

Meerding, W.J., Bonsel, G.J., Brouwer, W.B., Stuifbergen, M.C., Essink-Bot, M.L. (2010). Social time preferences for health and money elicited with a choice experiment. Value in Health, 13 (4), 368–374. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00681.x.10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00681.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mill, G.A., Van Rensburg, T.M., Hynes, S., Dooley, C. (2007). Preferences for multiple use forest management in Ireland: Citizen and consumer perspectives. Ecological Economics, 60 (3), 642–653. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.005.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Moser, C., Stauffacher, M., Smieszek, T., Seidl, R., Krütli, P., Scholz, R.W. (2013). Psychological factors in discounting negative impacts of nuclear waste. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 121–131. DOI: /10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.003.10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Newell, R.G., Pizer, W.A. (2003). Discounting the Distant Future: How Much Do Uncertain Rates Increase Valuations? SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.366281.10.2139/ssrn.366281Search in Google Scholar

Nyborg, K. (2000). Homo economicus and homo politicus: interpretation and aggregation of environmental values. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42 (3), 305–322. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00091-3.10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00091-3Search in Google Scholar

Orr, S.W. (2007). Values, preferences, and the citizen-consumer distinction in cost-benefit analysis. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 6 (1), 107–130. DOI: 10.1177/1470594x07068306.10.1177/1470594X07068306Search in Google Scholar

Perman, R., Ma, Y., McGilvray, J., Common, M. (2003). Natural Resource and Environmental Economics, Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Perrings, C., Gadgil, M. (2003). Conserving biodiversity: Reconciling local and global public benefits. In: I. Kaul, P. Conceicao, K. Le Goulven, R.U. Mendoza (eds.), Providing Global Pubic Goods. Managing Globalization (pp. 532–555). New York: United Nations Development Programme, Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0195157400.003.0022.10.1093/0195157400.003.0022Search in Google Scholar

Saez, C.A., Requena, J.C. (2007). Reconciling sustainability and discounting in Cost–Benefit Analysis: A methodological proposal. Ecological Economics, 60 (4), 712–725 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.002.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Sagoff, M. (1986). Values and preferences. Ethics, 96 (2), 301–316. DOI: 10.1086/292748.10.1086/292748Search in Google Scholar

Sandler, T. (2009). Intergenerational public goods: Transnational considerations. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 56 (3), 353–370. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.2009.00488.x.10.1111/j.1467-9485.2009.00488.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sen, A.K. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 317–344.Search in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. (1996). Social norms and social roles. Columbia Law Review, 96 (4), 903–968. DOI: 10.2307/1123430.10.2307/1123430Search in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R., Rowell, A. (2007). On discounting regulatory benefits: Risk, money, and intergenerational equity. The University of Chicago Law Review, 171–208. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.756832.10.2139/ssrn.756832Search in Google Scholar

Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesely.Search in Google Scholar

Weatherly, J.N., Terrell, H.K., Derenne, A. (2010). Delay discounting of different commodities. The Journal of General Psychology: Experimental, Psychological, and Comparative Psychology, 137 (3), 273–286. DOI: 10.1080/00221309.2010.484449.10.1080/00221309.2010.484449Search in Google Scholar

Whitehead, J.C., Blomquist, G.C. (2006). The use of contingent valuation in benefit-cost analysis. In: A. Alberini, J.R. Kahn (eds.) Handbook on contingent valuation (pp. 92–115). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar. DOI: 10.4337/9781845427917.00009.10.4337/9781845427917.00009Search in Google Scholar

WWW1 http://stat.gov.pl (20.02.2020).Search in Google Scholar