[Almansa, C., Martínez-Paz, J.M. (2011). What weight should be assigned to future environmental impacts? A probabilistic cost benefit analysis using recent advances on discounting. Science of the Total Environment, 409 (7), 1305–1314. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.004.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Bateman, I.J., Day, B.H., Georgiou, S., Lake, I. (2006). The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecological Pconomics, 60 (2), 450–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumol, W.J. (1968). On the social rate of discount. The American Economic Review, 58 (4), 788–802.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berry, M.S., Nickerson, N.P., Odum, A.L. (2017). Delay discounting as an index of sustainable behavior: devaluation of future air quality and implications for public health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14 (9), 997. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14090997.10.3390/ijerph14090997]Search in Google Scholar
[Bleichrodt, H., Gao, Y., Rohde, K.I. (2016). A measurement of decreasing impatience for health and money. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 52 (3), 213–231. DOI: 10.1007/s11166-016-9240-0.10.1007/s11166-016-9240-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyle, K.J. (2017). Contingent valuation in practice. In: P.A. Champ, K.J. Boyle, T.C. Brown (eds.) A primer on nonmarket valuation (pp. 83–131). Springer: Dordrecht. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8_4.10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapman, G.B. (2001). Time preferences for the very long term. Acta Psychologica, 108 (2), 95–116. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00030-0.10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00030-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Cropper, M.L., Aydede, S.K., Portney, P.R. (1994). Preferences for life saving programs: how the public discounts time and age. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8 (3), 243–265. DOI: 10.1007/bf01064044.10.1007/BF01064044]Search in Google Scholar
[Foltyn-Zarychta, M. (2012). Biases in Contingent Valuation Method Used for Investment Project Appraisal. In: P. Cervinek (ed.), European Financial Systems (pp. 45–50). Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.]Search in Google Scholar
[Foltyn-Zarychta, M. (2018). Ocena inwestycji międzypokoleniowych – kryteria etyczne w ekonomicznej ocenie efektywności projektów inwestycyjnych. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Foltyn-Zarychta, M., Zerbe, R.O. (2019). The Economics of CSR: the role of citizen-consumer mix in the social responsible investing. In: M. Castellaneta, F. Vessia (eds.), La Responsabilità Sociale D’Impresa Tra Diritto Societario E Diritto Internazionale. Serie VI, n. 175, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane (pp. 81–114). Napoli: Università Degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza Pubblicazioni.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frederick, S. (2003). Measuring intergenerational time preference: Are future lives valued less? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26 (1), 39–53. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022298223127.10.1023/A:1022298223127]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanley, N., Schläpfer, F., Spurgeon, J. (2003). Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values. Journal of Environmental Management, 68 (3), 297–304. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4797(03)00084-7.10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00084-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Hardisty, D.J., Weber, E.U. (2009). Discounting future green: money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138 (3), 329. DOI: 10.1037/a0016433.10.1037/a0016433]Search in Google Scholar
[Heal, G. (1997). Discounting and climate change. Climatic Change, 37 (2), 335–343.10.1023/A:1005384629724]Search in Google Scholar
[Howley, P., Hynes, S., O’Donoghue, C. (2010). The citizen versus consumer distinction: an exploration of individuals’ preferences in contingent valuation studies. Ecological Economics, 69 (7), 1524–1531. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.012.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnston, R.J., Besedin, E.Y., Holland, B.M. (2019). Modelling distance decay within valuation meta-analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 72 (3), 657–690. DOI: 10.1007/s10640-018-0218-z.10.1007/s10640-018-0218-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Jørgensen, S.L., Olsen, S.B., Ladenburg, J., Martinsen, L., Svenningsen, S.R., Hasler, B. (2013). Spatially induced disparities in users’ and non-users’ WTP for water quality improvements—Testing the effect of multiple substitutes and distance decay. Ecological Economics, 92, 58–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.015.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Lazo, J.K., McClelland, G.H., Schulze, W.D. (1997). Economic theory and psychology of nonuse values. Land Economics, 358–371. DOI: 10.2307/3147173.10.2307/3147173]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewinsohn-Zamir, D. (1998). Consumer preferences, citizen preferences, and the provision of public goods. The Yale Law Journal, 108 (2), 377–406. DOI: 10.2307/797478.10.2307/797478]Search in Google Scholar
[Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (2), 573–597. DOI: 10.2307/2118482.10.2307/2118482]Search in Google Scholar
[Luckert, M.K., Adamowicz, W.L. (1993). Empirical measures of factors affecting social rates of discount. Environmental and Resource Economics, 3 (1), 1–21. DOI: 10.1007/bf00338317.10.1007/BF00338317]Search in Google Scholar
[Lumley, S. (1997). The environment and the ethics of discounting: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 20 (1), 71–82. DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(96)00073-0.10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00073-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Meerding, W.J., Bonsel, G.J., Brouwer, W.B., Stuifbergen, M.C., Essink-Bot, M.L. (2010). Social time preferences for health and money elicited with a choice experiment. Value in Health, 13 (4), 368–374. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00681.x.10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00681.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mill, G.A., Van Rensburg, T.M., Hynes, S., Dooley, C. (2007). Preferences for multiple use forest management in Ireland: Citizen and consumer perspectives. Ecological Economics, 60 (3), 642–653. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.005.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Moser, C., Stauffacher, M., Smieszek, T., Seidl, R., Krütli, P., Scholz, R.W. (2013). Psychological factors in discounting negative impacts of nuclear waste. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 121–131. DOI: /10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.003.10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Newell, R.G., Pizer, W.A. (2003). Discounting the Distant Future: How Much Do Uncertain Rates Increase Valuations? SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.366281.10.2139/ssrn.366281]Search in Google Scholar
[Nyborg, K. (2000). Homo economicus and homo politicus: interpretation and aggregation of environmental values. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42 (3), 305–322. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00091-3.10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00091-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Orr, S.W. (2007). Values, preferences, and the citizen-consumer distinction in cost-benefit analysis. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 6 (1), 107–130. DOI: 10.1177/1470594x07068306.10.1177/1470594X07068306]Search in Google Scholar
[Perman, R., Ma, Y., McGilvray, J., Common, M. (2003). Natural Resource and Environmental Economics, Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Perrings, C., Gadgil, M. (2003). Conserving biodiversity: Reconciling local and global public benefits. In: I. Kaul, P. Conceicao, K. Le Goulven, R.U. Mendoza (eds.), Providing Global Pubic Goods. Managing Globalization (pp. 532–555). New York: United Nations Development Programme, Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0195157400.003.0022.10.1093/0195157400.003.0022]Search in Google Scholar
[Saez, C.A., Requena, J.C. (2007). Reconciling sustainability and discounting in Cost–Benefit Analysis: A methodological proposal. Ecological Economics, 60 (4), 712–725 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.002.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Sagoff, M. (1986). Values and preferences. Ethics, 96 (2), 301–316. DOI: 10.1086/292748.10.1086/292748]Search in Google Scholar
[Sandler, T. (2009). Intergenerational public goods: Transnational considerations. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 56 (3), 353–370. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.2009.00488.x.10.1111/j.1467-9485.2009.00488.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Sen, A.K. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 317–344.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sunstein, C.R. (1996). Social norms and social roles. Columbia Law Review, 96 (4), 903–968. DOI: 10.2307/1123430.10.2307/1123430]Search in Google Scholar
[Sunstein, C.R., Rowell, A. (2007). On discounting regulatory benefits: Risk, money, and intergenerational equity. The University of Chicago Law Review, 171–208. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.756832.10.2139/ssrn.756832]Search in Google Scholar
[Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesely.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weatherly, J.N., Terrell, H.K., Derenne, A. (2010). Delay discounting of different commodities. The Journal of General Psychology: Experimental, Psychological, and Comparative Psychology, 137 (3), 273–286. DOI: 10.1080/00221309.2010.484449.10.1080/00221309.2010.484449]Search in Google Scholar
[Whitehead, J.C., Blomquist, G.C. (2006). The use of contingent valuation in benefit-cost analysis. In: A. Alberini, J.R. Kahn (eds.) Handbook on contingent valuation (pp. 92–115). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar. DOI: 10.4337/9781845427917.00009.10.4337/9781845427917.00009]Search in Google Scholar
[WWW1 http://stat.gov.pl (20.02.2020).]Search in Google Scholar