Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Fatigue of Aircraft Structures
AHEAD OF PRINT
Accesso libero
Some Comments Concerning the Preparation of and Fatigue Testing of the Aircraft’s Cable-Control System
Józef Brzęczek
Józef Brzęczek
| 29 apr 2024
Fatigue of Aircraft Structures
AHEAD OF PRINT
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Article Category:
Research Article
Pubblicato online:
29 apr 2024
Pagine:
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/fas-2023-0004
Parole chiave
aviation cable control systems
,
cables and ropes fatigue tests
,
inspection intervals assessment
,
load spectrum
,
fatigue life
© 2023 Józef Brzęczek, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1.
The results of the KSAN cable (aviation cable) tests with a diameter of 3.5 mm up to 100,000 ± 90° bends (Kubryn et al., 2018).
Figure 2.
Simplified system of forces and moments of the aircraft in the classical layout.
Figure 3.
Simplified system of forces and moments ensuring the balance and longitudinal control of the classical layout of monoplane.
Figure 4.
Classical horizontal tail unit aircraft or glider.
Figure 5.
Typical flight mission (Brzęczek, 2020).
Figure 6.
Scheme of the elevator aircraft cable-control system.
Figure 7.
Probability density function of flight time distribution for the aircraft commuter category (Kubryn et al., 2018).
Figure 8.
Real deflection of the elevator during flight, sampling of 50 Hz. Elaborated based on tests data (Department of Avionics and Control Systems of Rzeszów University of Technology, 2019).
Figure 9.
Spectrum of rudder deflection. Elaborated on (Department of Avionics and Control Systems of Rzeszów University of Technology, 2019) data. Aerodrome traffic circuit flight. The average value depends on mass and CG location.
Figure 10.
An example of the Cmz = f (αH, βH, υ) for specific values of K = 0.25, Re = 1.49 106, Ma = 0.3 (Krzysiak, 1983).
Figure 11.
An example of b1 = f (Ma) for the value K = 0.25 (Krzysiak, 1983).
Figure 12.
An example of b2 = f (M) for the value K = 0.25 (Krzysiak, 1983).
Figure 13.
Idea of a cable test strand4. More than six points of cable testing and inspection. The strand enables the ongoing measurement of cable elongation. The markings in Figure 13 mean: 1 – spring or hydraulic system, simulation of nonlinear hinge change, 2 – cable lock, 3 – pulleys, 4 – cable A, 5 – wrap angle adjustment, 6 –turnbuckl, 7 – cable B, 8 – tensioner (pre-tension value of force), and 9 – stochastic angular displacement (βH simulation).