Accesso libero

What Do Polygraphers–Practitioners Expect from Science?

  
21 ott 2022
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita
Scarica la copertina

Langleben D.D, Loughead J.W., Bilker W.B., Ruparel K., Childress A.R. (2005), Telling truth from lie individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 26,4, 262–272. Search in Google Scholar

Philips M.C., Vendemia J.M.C. (2008), Individual Differences in Comparison Question Anxiety. European Polygraph 2 (3–4), 5–6. Search in Google Scholar

Vendemia J.M.C. (1999), Neural mechanisms of deception and response congruity to general knowledge information and autobiographical information in visual two-stimulus paradigms with motor response. Department of Defence, Polygraph Institute, DoD PI 99-P-0010. Search in Google Scholar

Vendemia J.M.C. (2014), fMRI as a Method of Detection of Deception. A Review of Experience. European Polygraph 8, 1 (27), 5–21.10.2478/ep-2014-0001 Search in Google Scholar

Widacki J. (2007), From forensic psychophysiology to forensic neurophysiology. European Polygraph 2, 93–103. Search in Google Scholar

Widacki J., ed. (2018), Kierunki rozwoju instrumentalnej i nieinstrumentalnej detekcji kłamstwa. Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, Kraków 2018. Search in Google Scholar

Widacki J. (2021), History of Polygraph Examination, Polskie Towarzystwo Kryminalistyczne, Warszawa 2021. Search in Google Scholar

Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Legge, Diritto criminale, Diritto criminale, altro, Criminologia, Diritto, altro, Medicina, Medicina clinica, Psichiatria, Psicoterapia