Uneingeschränkter Zugang

What Do Polygraphers–Practitioners Expect from Science?

   | 21. Okt. 2022

Zitieren

Langleben D.D, Loughead J.W., Bilker W.B., Ruparel K., Childress A.R. (2005), Telling truth from lie individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 26,4, 262–272. Search in Google Scholar

Philips M.C., Vendemia J.M.C. (2008), Individual Differences in Comparison Question Anxiety. European Polygraph 2 (3–4), 5–6. Search in Google Scholar

Vendemia J.M.C. (1999), Neural mechanisms of deception and response congruity to general knowledge information and autobiographical information in visual two-stimulus paradigms with motor response. Department of Defence, Polygraph Institute, DoD PI 99-P-0010. Search in Google Scholar

Vendemia J.M.C. (2014), fMRI as a Method of Detection of Deception. A Review of Experience. European Polygraph 8, 1 (27), 5–21.10.2478/ep-2014-0001 Search in Google Scholar

Widacki J. (2007), From forensic psychophysiology to forensic neurophysiology. European Polygraph 2, 93–103. Search in Google Scholar

Widacki J., ed. (2018), Kierunki rozwoju instrumentalnej i nieinstrumentalnej detekcji kłamstwa. Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, Kraków 2018. Search in Google Scholar

Widacki J. (2021), History of Polygraph Examination, Polskie Towarzystwo Kryminalistyczne, Warszawa 2021. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2380-0550
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Rechtswissenschaften, Strafrecht, andere, Kriminologie, Medizin, Klinische Medizin, Psychiatrie, Psychosomatische Medizin, Psychotherapie