[
Aguinis, H., Beltran, J.R., Archibold, E.E., Jean, E.L., & Rice, D.B. (2023). Thought experiments: Review and recommendations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(3), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2658
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alexander, T.M. (2013). The human eros: Eco-ontology and the aesthetics of existence. Fordham University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amsen, E. (2019, June 14). Science educators are turning to the performing arts. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/evaamsen/2019/06/14/science-educators-are-turning-to-the-performing-arts/?sh=7ed5566937b1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bascopé, M., & Reiss, K. (2021). Place-based STEM education for sustainability: A path towards socioecological resilience. Sustainability, 13(15), 8414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158414
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beghetto, R.A. (2019). Structured uncertainty: How creativity thrives under constraints and uncertainty. In C.A. Mullen (Ed.), Creativity under duress in education? Resistive theories, practices, and actions (pp. 27–40). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beghetto, R.A., & Kaufman, J.C. (2007). The genesis of creative greatness: Mini-c and the expert performance approach. High Ability Studies, 18(1), 59–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190709554421
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beghetto, R.A., & Kaufman, J.C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beghetto, R.A., & Kaufman, J.C. (2017). Theories of creativity. In J.A. Plucker (Ed.), Creativity & innovation: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 35–48). Prufrock.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Differences in the development of creative competencies in children schooled in diverse learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boell, S.K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bracken, J.A. (1995). Whitehead’s philosophy of creativity. Process Studies, 24(3-4), 282–293.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Branco, A., & Dantas de Paula, L. (2025). Thinking outside of the (Western) box: Cultural psychology perspectives on creativity in education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 59(1), e655. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.655
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burnard, P., Craft, A., Cremin, T., Duffy, B., Hanson, R., Keene, J., Haynes, L., & Burns, D. (2006). Documenting ‘possibility thinking’: A journey of collaborative enquiry. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760600880001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carr-Chellman, D. (2023). Education for moral judgment: Situational creativity and Dewey’s aesthetics. Education and Culture, 39(1), Article 3. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/eandc/vol39/iss1/art3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chan, S., & Yuen, M. (2014). Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers’ creativity-fostering practices in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chang, T.S., Wang, H.C., Haynes, A.M., Song, M.M., Lai, S.Y., & Hsieh, S.H. (2022). Enhancing student creativity through an interdisciplinary, project-oriented problem-based learning undergraduate curriculum. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101173
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiu, T.K., Chai, C.S., Williams, P.J., & Lin, T.J. (2021). Teacher professional development on self-determination theory–based design thinking in STEM education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 153–165.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collard, P., & Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing creativity in education. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 348–364. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26609225
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corazza, G.E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creely, E., & Blannin, J. (2025). Creative partnerships with generative AI: Possibilities for education and beyond. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, 101727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101727
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creely, E., Henderson, M., & Henriksen, D. (2019, March). Failing to succeed: The value of failure in creativity. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1403–1411). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Craft, A. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the early years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.07.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cropley, A. (2016). The myths of heaven-sent creativity: Toward a perhaps less democratic but more down-to-earth understanding. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195614
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperPerennial.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dewett, T. (2007). Linking intrinsic motivation, risk taking, and employee creativity in an R&D environment. R&D Management, 37(3), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00469.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Minton, Balch & Co.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fan, M., & Cai, W. (2022). How does a creative learning environment foster student creativity? An examination on multiple explanatory mechanisms. Current Psychology, 41(7), 4667–4676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00974-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feldman, A. (2015). STEAM rising: Why we need to put the arts into STEM education. Slate. https://slate.com/technology/2015/06/steam-vs-stem-why-we-need-to-put-the-arts-into-stem-education.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gabora, L. (2020). Research on creativity. In E.G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 1–6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_387
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd ed.). Continuum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gardiner, P. (2020). Learning to think together: Creativity, interdisciplinary collaboration and epistemic control. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100749
]Search in Google Scholar
[
George, G., Merrill, R.K., & Schillebeeckx, S.J.D. (2021). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glăveanu, V.P. (2014). Theorising context in psychology: The case of creativity. Theory & Psychology, 24(3), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glăveanu, V.P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grainger, T., Goouch, K., & Lambirth, A. (2005). Creativity and writing: Developing voice and verve in the classroom. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Griffith, A. (2023). The creativity lab: Interdisciplinary creativity in higher education. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 12(1), 85–108.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halsey, V. (2011). Brilliance by design: Creating learning experiences that connect, inspire, and engage. Berrett- Koehler Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hartlaub, V., & Schneider, T. (2012). Educational choice and risk aversion: How important is structural vs. individual risk aversion? (No. 433). SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henriksen, D. (2019). Expanding the paradigm: Bringing designerly perspectives into creativity scholarship. Creativity Studies, 12(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2019.6757
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henriksen, D., Creely, E., & Henderson, M. (2019). Failing in creativity: The problem of policy and practice in Australia and the United States. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 55(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2019.1549429
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henriksen, D., & Mishra, P. (2015). We teach who we are: Creativity in the lives and practices of accomplished teachers. Teachers College Record, 117(7), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700708
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henriksen, D., & Mishra, P. (2020). Of metaphors and molecules: Figurative language bridging STEM and the arts in education. Leonardo, 53(3), 316–320. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_01607
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 27–37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hondzel, C.D., & Hansen, R. (2015). Associating creativity, context, and experiential learning. Education Inquiry, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v6.23403
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jindal-Snape, D., Davies, D., Collier, C., Howe, A., Digby, R., & Hay, P. (2013). The impact of creative learning environments on learners: A systematic literature review. Improving Schools, 16(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213478461
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, A.H. (1952). Whitehead’s theory of creativity. Columbia University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapur, M. (2015). Learning from productive failure. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2015.1002195
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., & Sternberg, R.J. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koh, J.H.L., Chai, C.S., Wong, B., & Hong, H.Y. (2015). Design thinking and education (pp. 1–15). Springer Singapore.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LeClerc, I. (1958). Whitehead’s metaphysics: An introductory exposition. University of Notre Dame Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lilly, F.R., & Bramwell-Rejskind, G. (2004). The dynamics of creative teaching. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(2), 102–124.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, H.Y., Hsu, D.Y., Han, H.M., Wang, I.T., Chen, N.H., Han, C.Y., Chen, Y.L., & Huang, D.H. (2022). Effectiveness of interdisciplinary teaching on creativity: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 5875. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105875
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marteel-Parrish, A., & Harvey, H. (2019). Applying the principles of green chemistry in art: Design of a crossdisciplinary course about ‘art in the Anthropocene: Greener art through greener chemistry’. Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews, 12(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2019.1609595
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). A realist approach for qualitative research. Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKerracher, A. (2016). Understanding creativity, one metaphor at a time. Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1229982
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehta, R., Keenan, S., Henriksen, D., & Mishra, P. (2019). Developing a rhetoric of aesthetics: The (often) forgotten link between art and STEM. STEAM Education: Theory and Practice, 117–141.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mesle, R.C. (2008). Process-relational philosophy: An introduction to Alfred North Whitehead. Rutgers University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miettinen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/026013700293458
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moirano, R., Sánchez, M.A., & Štěpánek, L. (2020). Creative interdisciplinary collaboration: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100626
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ozalevli, C.C. (2023, April 13). Why sustainability must become an integral part of STEM education. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/04/why-sustainability-must-become-an-integral-part-of-stem-education/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review.Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petroski, H. (2006). Engineering: A great profession. American Scientist, 94(4), 304–307.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rawat, K.J., Qazi, W., & Hamid, S. (2012). Creativity and education. Academic Research International, 2(2), 264–271. http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.2(2)/2012(2.2-27).pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richardson, C., & Mishra, P. (2018). Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2015). Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. Viking.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Root-Bernstein, R.S., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2001). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rousell, D. (2022). Accidental creatures: Whitehead’s creativity and the clashing intensities of more-than-human life. Qualitative Inquiry, 28(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004211065811
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M.A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). Elsevier Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryhammar, L., & Brolin, C. (1999). Creativity research: Historical considerations and main lines of development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383990430303
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sawyer, R.K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sawyer, R.K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013282
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sawyer, R.K., & Henriksen, D. (2024). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sharples, M. (2023). Towards social generative AI for education: Theory, practices and ethics. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2261131
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thorburn, M., & Stolz, S.A. (2023). Where Merleau-Ponty meets Dewey: Habit, embodiment, and education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 42(5), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-023-09897-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vaughn, M. (2020). What is student agency and why is it needed now more than ever? Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702393
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weng, X., Chiu, T.K., & Tsang, C.C. (2022). Promoting student creativity and entrepreneurship through real-world problem-based maker education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101046
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, R.E. (2016). Breaking down walls to creativity through interdisciplinary design. Educational Technology, 47–52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whitehead, A.N. (1920). The concept of nature. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whitehead, A.N. (1926). Science and the modern world. Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whitehead, A.N. (1968). Modes of thought. Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whitehead, A.N. (1985). Process and reality. Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yan, D. (2024). Posthuman creativity: Unveiling cyborg subjectivity through ChatGPT. Qualitative Inquiry, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004241231923
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, W., Zhang, Q., Yu, B., & Zhao, L. (2015). Knowledge map of creativity research based on keywords network and co-word analysis, 1992–2011. Quality & Quantity, 49, 1023–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0032-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, E., & Lee, D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art. PNAS Nexus, 3(3), pga052. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae052
]Search in Google Scholar
e 