[
1. Agro, S. (1977). Graphing. USMES Intermediate “How to” Set. Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED220330.pdf [01 August 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Akobeng, A. K. (2016). Understanding type I and type II errors, statistical power and sample size. Acta Paediatrica, Vol. 105, No. 6, pp. 605-609. DOI: 10.1111/apa.1338426935977
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
3. Angrist, J. D., Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton university press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvcm4j72
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
4. Angrist, J. D., Pischke, J. S. (2017). Undergraduate Econometrics Instruction: Through Our Classes, Darkly. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 125-144. DOI: 10.1257/jep.31.2.125
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
5. Bar-Hillel, M., Wagenaar, W. A. (1991). The perception of randomness. Advances in applied mathematics, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 428-454. DOI: 10.1016/0196-8858(91)90029-I
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
6. Batanero, C., Green, D. R., Serrano, L. R. (1998). Randomness, its meanings and educational implications. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 113-123. DOI: 10.1080/0020739980290111
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
7. Batanero, C., Serrano, L. (1999). The meaning of randomness for secondary school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 558-567. DOI: 10.2307/749774
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
8. Ben-Zvi, D., Garfield, J. B. (Eds.). (2004). The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer academic publishers. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2278-6
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
9. Birnbaum, I. (1982). Interpreting statistical significance. Teaching Statistics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 24-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9639.1982.tb00451.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
10. Boels, L., Bakker, A., Van Dooren, W., Drijvers, P. (2019). Conceptual difficulties when interpreting histograms: A review. Educational Research Review, Vol. 28, pp. 1-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100291
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
11. Bossé, M., Marland, E., Rhoads, G., Rudziewicz, M. (2016). Searching for the Black Box: Misconceptions of Linearity. Chance, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 14-23. DOI: 10.1080/09332480.2016.1263094
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
12. Capraro, M. M., Kulm, G., Capraro, R. M. (2005). Middle grades: Misconceptions in statistical thinking. School Science and Mathematics, Vol. 105, No. 4, pp. 165-174. DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18156.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
13. Cooper, L. L., Shore, F. S. (2008). Students’ misconceptions in interpreting center and variability of data represented via histograms and stem-and-leaf plots. Journal of Statistics Education, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2008.11889559
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
14. Davidson, R., MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. Available at https://russell-davidson.arts.mcgill.ca/textbooks/EIE-davidson-mackinnon-2021.pdf [13 May 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Delmas, R., Garfield, J., Ooms, A. (2005, July). Using assessment items to study students’ difficulty reading and interpreting graphical representations of distributions. Available at https://www.causeweb.org/cause/archive/artist/articles/SRTL4_ARTIST.pdf [21 May 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Doran, H. E., Doran, H. (1989). Applied regression analysis in econometrics. CRC Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Escofier, B., Pagès, J. (1998). Analyses factorielles simples et multiples. Available at https://cdn-cms.f-static.com/uploads/1460418/normal_5b9ba5dc15394.pdf [10 September 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Falk, R. (1986). Misconceptions of statistical significance. Journal of Structural Learning, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 83-96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Giordan, A., De Vecchi, G. (1987). Les origines du savoir. Des conceptions des apprenants aux concepts scientifiques. Delachaux et Nestlé, Neuchâtel-Paris.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Glavic, B., Köhler, S., Riddle, S., Ludäscher, B. (2015). Towards Constraint-based Explanations for Answers and {Non-Answers}. Available at https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/tapp15/tapp15-glavic-revised.pdf [3 August 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Gujarathi, D. M. (2004). Gujarati: Basic Econometrics. Available at http://portal.belesparadisecollege.edu.et:8080/library/bitstream/123456789/3407/1/10.Gujarat.PDF [25 June 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Hancock, C. K. (1965). Some misconceptions of regression analysis in physical organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 42, No. 11, pp. 608-609. DOI: 10.1021/ed042p608
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
23. Huang, J., Chen, T., Doan, A., Naughton, J. F. (2008). On the provenance of non-answers to queries over extracted data. Available at https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~jhuang/case.pdf [17 May 2022].10.14778/1453856.1453936
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Krishnan, S., Idris, N. (2014). Students’ misconceptions about hypothesis test. Redimat, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 276-293. DOI: 10.4471/redimat.2014.54
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
25. Lebart, L., Morineau, A., Piron, M. (1995). Statistique exploratoire multidimensionnelle. Available at https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers11-10/010007837.pdf [7 June 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Lee, S., Ludäscher, B., Glavic, B. (2018). Provenance summaries for answers and non-answers. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, Vol. 11, No. 12, pp. 1954-1957. DOI: 10.14778/3229863.3236233
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
27. Lindner, T., Puck, J., Verbeke, A. (2020). Misconceptions about multicollinearity in international business research: Identification, consequences, and remedies. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 283-298. DOI: 10.1057/s41267-019-00257-1
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
28. Madsen, B. S. (2016). Data collection. In Statistics for Non-Statisticians, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-49349-6_1
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
29. Motulsky, H. J. (2015). Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics. Pharmacology research perspectives, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-8. DOI: 10.1002/prp2.93431722525692012
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
30. Pfannkuch, M., Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). Developing teachers’ statistical thinking. In Teaching statistics in school mathematics-challenges for teaching and teacher education, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 323-333. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_31
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
31. Reeves, C. A., Brewer, J. K. (1980). Hypothesis testing and proof by contradiction: an analogy. Teaching Statistics, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 57-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9639.1980.tb00387.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
32. Robert, A. D., Bouillaguet, A. (2002). L’analyse de contenu. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Rossman, A. J., Chance, B., Obispo, C. P. S. L. (2004). Anticipating and addressing student misconceptions. Available at https://www.rossmanchance.com/artist/proceedings/rossman.pdf [17 June 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Sotos, A. E. C., Vanhoof, S., Van den Noortgate, W., Onghena, P. (2007). Students’ misconceptions of statistical inference: A review of the empirical evidence from research on statistics education. Educational research review, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 98-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.04.001
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
35. Sotos, A. E. C., Vanhoof, S., Van den Noortgate, W., Onghena, P. (2009). How confident are students in their misconceptions about hypothesis tests?. Journal of Statistics Education, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2009.11889514
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
36. Spanos, A. (1986). Statistical foundations of econometric modeling. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511599293
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
37. Swann, G. P. (2019). Is precise econometrics an illusion?. The Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 343-355. DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2019.1654956
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
38. Taber, K. S. (2005). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education, Vol. 89, No. 1, pp. 94-116. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20038
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
39. Tompkins, C. A. (1993). Using and interpreting linear regression and correlation analyses: Some cautions and considerations. Available at http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/1435/1/21-04.pdf [10 April 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Vallecillos, A. (2000). Understanding of the logic of hypothesis testing amongst university students. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 101-123. DOI: 10.1007/BF03338912
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
41. Wild, C. J., Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International statistical review, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 223-248. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00442.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
42. Williams, M. N., Grajales, C. A. G., Kurkiewicz, D. (2013). Assumptions of multiple regression: Correcting two misconceptions. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.7275/55hn-wk47
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar