[
1. Abukhait, R. M., Bani-Melhem, S., Zeffane, R. (2019). Empowerment, Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Behaviours: Exploring Gender Differences. International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1-28.10.1142/S1363919619500063
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Albury, D. (2005). Fostering innovation in public services. Public money and management, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 51-56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Andersen, S. C., Jakobsen, M. L. (2018). Political Pressure, Conformity Pressure, and Performance Information as Drivers of Public Sector Innovation Adoption. International Public Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 213-242.10.1080/10967494.2018.1425227
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., Lay, G. (2008). Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation, Vol. 28, No. 10, pp. 644-657.10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Audenaert, M., Decramer, A., George, B., Verschuere, B., Van Waeyenberg, T. (2019). When employee performance management affects individual innovation in public organizations: The role of consistency and LMX. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 815-834.10.1080/09585192.2016.1239220
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Australian Public Service Commission (APSC) (2012). State of the Service Report: State of the Service Series 2010-2011. Canberr, Commonwealth of Australia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Awang, Z., Afthanorhan, A., Mohamad, M., Asri, M. A. M. (2015). An evaluation of measurement model for medical tourism research: the confirmatory factor analysis approach. International Journal of Tourism Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 29-45.10.1504/IJTP.2015.075141
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Bailey, S. J. (2002). Public sector economics: theory, policy and practice. Basingstroke, Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Bartlett, D., Dibben, P. (2002). Public sector innovation and entrepreneurship: Case studies from local government. Local government studies, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 107-121.10.1080/714004159
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Bland, T., Bruk, B., Kim, D., Lee, K. T. (2010). Enhancing public sector innovation: Examining the network-innovation relationship. The innovation journal: The public sector innovation journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 1-17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Bloch, C., Bugge, M. M. (2013). Public sector innovation – From theory to measurement. Structural change and economic dynamics, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 133-145.10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Bommert, B. (2010). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International public management review, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 15–33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Daglio, M., Gerson D., Kitchen, H. (2014). Building Organisational Capacity for Public Sector Innovation. Paris, OECD.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Damanpour, F., Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: effects of environment, organization and top managers. British journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 215-236.10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Damanpour, F., Schneider, M. (2008). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of public administration research and theory, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 495-522.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Fernandez, S., Moldogaziev, T. (2012). Using employee empowerment to encourage innovative behavior in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 155-187.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Fricker, R. D. (2008). Sampling methods for web and e-mail surveys. The SAGE handbook of online research methods, Vol. 20, No.1, pp. 195-216.10.4135/9780857020055.n11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. George, D., Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. New York, Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Gittelman, M. (2006). National institutions, public–private knowledge flows, and innovation performance: A comparative study of the biotechnology industry in the US and France. Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 1052-1068.10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Harlow, Pearson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Head, G. (2013). Creating an Innovative Public Sector. New South Wales, Public Service Commission.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Hollanders, H., Arundel, A., Buligescu, B. (2013). European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard. Belgium, European Commission.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Hughes, A., Moore, K., Kataria, N. (2011). Innovation in Public Sector Organisations: A pilot survey for measuring innovation across the public sector. London, NESTA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Kafouros, M. I., Buckley, P. J., Sharp, J. A., Wang, C. (2008). The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation, Vol. 28, No.1, pp. 63-74.10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Keping, Y. (2018). Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for Political Analysis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-8.10.1007/s40647-017-0197-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Kline, R. B. (2013). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Applied quantitative analysis in the social sciences. New York, Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Kurz, V., Hüsig, S., Dowling, M. (2018). What drives different employee types of innovative behaviour? Development and test of an integrative model of employee driven innovation in German firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 397-426.10.1504/IJEIM.2018.092955
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Lattin, J. M., Carroll, J.D., Green, P.E. (2003). Analyzing multivariate data. Cole Pacific Grove, Thomson Brooks.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Lewis, J. M., Ricard, L. M., Klijn, E. H. (2018). How innovation drivers, networking and leadership shape public sector innovation capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 288-307.10.1177/0020852317694085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Lin, C., Lin, P., Song, F. M., Li, C. (2011). Managerial incentives, CEO characteristics and corporate innovation in China’s private sector. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 176-190.10.1016/j.jce.2009.12.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Lundvall, B. Å., Nielsen, P. (2007). Knowledge management and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 207-223.10.1108/01437720710755218
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Mongey, O. (2013). Innovation in the Irish public sector. Sligo, Institute of Technology.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Mulgan, G., Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 40-55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2017). Fostering Innovation in the Public Sector. Paris, OECD Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Maidenhead, UK, McGraw-Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Ramli, R. I., Abu-Hassan, N., Arifin, A. S. (2017). Exploratory Factor Analysis of Latent Constructs Used for Measuring Public Sector Innovation Performance in Malaysia. Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.14-24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Ricard, L. M., Klijn, E. H., Lewis, J. M., Ysa, T. (2017). Assessing public leadership styles for innovation: A comparison of Copenhagen, Rotterdam and Barcelona. Public Management Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 134-156.10.1080/14719037.2016.1148192
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Rivera-León, L., Simmonds, P., Roman, L. (2012). Trends and Challenges in Public Sector Innovation in Europe. Brussels, Innovation Policy Trend Chart.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Schot, J., Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, Vol. 47, No. 9, pp. 1554-1567.10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Singh, M., Sarkar, A. (2019). Role of psychological empowerment in the relationship between structural empowerment and innovative behaviour. Management Research Review, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 521-538.10.1108/MRR-04-2018-0158
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Sørensen, E., Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 842-868.10.1177/0095399711418768
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Taylor, S. P. (2018). Innovation in the public sector: dimensions, processes, barriers and developing a fostering framework. International Journal of Research Science & Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 28-37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Tiganasu, R., Pascariu, G. C., Nijkamp, P. (2019). Performance and Innovation in the Public Sector of the European Union Countries. An Analysis Based on the Dynamics of Perceptions, 2009-2016. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 94-123.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Vigoda-Gadot, E., Shoham, A., Schwabsky, N., Ruvio, A. (2008). Public Sector Innovation for Europe: A Multinational Eight-Country Exploration of Citizens’ perspectives. Public Administration, Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 307-329.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00731.x
]Search in Google Scholar
