Data Fusion and the Impact of Group Mobility on Load Distribution on MRHOF and OF0

1. Jenson, S. The Future IoT: Building Better Legos. – Computer, Vol. 50, 2017, No 2, pp. 68-71.10.1109/MC.2017.48 Search in Google Scholar

2. Zanella, A., N. Bui, A. Castellani, L. Vangelista, M. Zorzi. Internet of Things for Smart Cities. – IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol. 1, 2014, No 1, pp. 22-32.10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328 Search in Google Scholar

3. Bello, O., S. Zeadally. Intelligent Device-to-Device Communication in the Internet of Things. – IEEE Systems Journal, Vol. 10, 2016, No 3, pp. 1172-1182.10.1109/JSYST.2014.2298837 Search in Google Scholar

4. Xu, G., Y. Ding, J. Zhao, L. Hu, X. Fu. Research on the Internet of Things (IoT). – Sensors & Transducers, Vol. 160, 2013, No 12, p. 463. Search in Google Scholar

5. Nawaratne, R., D. Alahakoon, D. De Silva, P. Chhetri, N. Chilamkurti. Self-Evolving Intelligent Algorithms for Facilitating Data Interoperability in IoT Environments. – Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 86, 2018, pp. 421-432.10.1016/j.future.2018.02.049 Search in Google Scholar

6. Mostarda, L., A. Navarra, F. Nobili. Fast File Transfers from IoT Devices by Using Multiple Interfaces. – Sensors, Vol. 21, 2021, No 1, pp. 36.10.3390/s21010036779539533374796 Search in Google Scholar

7. Qasaimeh, M., R. S. Al-Qassas, M. Ababneh. Software Design and Experimental Evaluation of a Reduced AES for IoT Applications. – Future Internet, Vol. 13, 2021, No 11, pp. 273.10.3390/fi13110273 Search in Google Scholar

8. Sasidharan, D., L. Jacob. Design of Composite Routing Metrics in LOADng Routing Protocol for IoT Applications. – In: Proc. of ICN’2017, 2017, p. 26. Search in Google Scholar

9. Gomez, C., P. Salvatella, O. Alonso, J. Paradells. Tiny AODV: Adapting AODV for IEEE 802.15.4 Mesh Sensor Networks: Theoretical Discussion and Performance Evaluation in a Real Environment. – In: Proc. of International Symposium on on World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, 2006, pp. 159-170. Search in Google Scholar

10. Winter, T., P. Thubert, T. Clausen, J. Hui, R. Kelsey, P. Levis, K. Pister, R. Struik, J. Vasseur, R. Alexander. RPL: IPV6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks, RFC 6550. IETF ROLL WG, Tech. Rep., 2012. Search in Google Scholar

11. Qiu, T., Y. Lv, F. Xia, N. Chen, J. Wan, A. Tolba. ERGID: An Efficient Routing Protocol for Emergency Response Internet of Things. – Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Vol. 72, 2016, pp. 104-112.10.1016/j.jnca.2016.06.009 Search in Google Scholar

12. Lahbib, A., K. Toumi, S. Elleuch, A. Laouiti, S. Martin. Link Reliable and Trust Aware RPL Routing Protocol for Internet of Things. – In: Proc. of 16th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA), 2017 IEEE, 2017, pp. 1-5.10.1109/NCA.2017.8171360 Search in Google Scholar

13. Zikria, Y. B., M. K. Afzal, F. Ishmanov, S. W. Kim, H. Yu. A Survey on Routing Protocols Supported by the Contiki Internet of Things Operating System. – Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 82, 2018, pp. 200-219.10.1016/j.future.2017.12.045 Search in Google Scholar

14. Anamalamudi, S., A. R. Sangi, M. Alkatheiri, A. M. Ahmed. AODV Routing Protocol for Cognitive Radio Access Based Internet of Things (IoT). – Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 83, 2018, pp. 228-238.10.1016/j.future.2017.12.060 Search in Google Scholar

15. Kim, H.-S., J. Ko, D. E. Culler, J. Paek. Challenging the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL): A Survey. – IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 19, 2017, No 4.10.1109/COMST.2017.2751617 Search in Google Scholar

16. Borgia, E., R. Bruno, A. Passarella. Making Opportunistic Networks in IoT Environments CCN-Ready: A Performance Evaluation of the MobCCN Protocol. – Computer Communications, 2018.10.1016/j.comcom.2018.03.005 Search in Google Scholar

17. Krishna, G. G., G. Krishna, N. Bhalaji. Analysis of Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks in IoT Real Time Applications. – Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 87, 2016, pp. 270-274.10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.160 Search in Google Scholar

18. Umamaheswari, S., A. Negi. Internet of Things and RPL Routing Protocol: A Study and Evaluation. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI’17), 2017, pp. 1-7. Search in Google Scholar

19. Liu, X., Z. Sheng, C. Yin, F. Ali, D. Roggen. Performance Analysis of Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) in Large Scale Networks. – IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol. 4, 2017, No 6, pp. 2172-2185.10.1109/JIOT.2017.2755980 Search in Google Scholar

20. Mardini, W., S. Aljawarneh, A. Al-Abdi, H. Taamneh. Performance Evaluation of RPL Objective Functions for Different Sending Intervals. – In: Proc. of 6th International Symposium on Digital Forensic and Security (ISDFS’18), 2018, pp. 1-6.10.1109/ISDFS.2018.8355323 Search in Google Scholar

21. Mardini, W., M. Ebrahim, M. Al-Rudaini. Comprehensive Performance Analysis of RPL Objective Functions in IoT Networks. – International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, Vol. 9, 2017, No 3, pp. 323-332.10.17762/ijcnis.v9i3.2515 Search in Google Scholar

22. Lamaazi, H., N. Benamar. OF-EC: A Novel Energy Consumption Aware Objective Function for RPL Based on Fuzzy Logic. – Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Vol. 117, 2018, pp. 42-58.10.1016/j.jnca.2018.05.015 Search in Google Scholar

23. Pradeska, N., N. W. Widyawan, S. S. Kusumawardani. Performance Analysis of Objective Function MRHOF and OF0 in Routing Protocol RPL IPV6 over Low Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPAN). – In: Proc. of 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering: Empowering Technology for Better Future, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

24. Lamaazi, H., N. Benamar, A. J. Jara. Study of the Impact of Designed Objective Function on the RPL-Based Routing Protocol. – In: Advances in Ubiquitous Networking 2. Springer, 2017, pp. 67-80.10.1007/978-981-10-1627-1_6 Search in Google Scholar

25. Qasem, M., H. Altawssi, M. B. Yassien, A. Al-Dubai. Performance Evaluation of RPL Objective Functions. – In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 2015, pp. 1606-1613.10.1109/CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM.2015.242 Search in Google Scholar

26. Wadhaj, I., I. Kristof, I. Romdhani, A. Al-Dubai. Performance Evaluation of the RPL Protocol in Fixed and Mobile Sink Low-Power and Lossy-Networks. – In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 2015, pp. 1600-1605.10.1109/CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM.2015.241 Search in Google Scholar

27. Saad, L. B., B. Tourancheau. Sinks Mobility Strategy in IPv6-Based WSNs for Network Lifetime Improvement. – In: Proc. of 4th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security, 2011, pp. 1-5.10.1109/NTMS.2011.5720597 Search in Google Scholar

28. Sanshi, S., C. D. Jaidhar. Assessment of Objective Functions under Mobility in RPL. – In: P. Sa, S. Bakshi, I. Hatzilygeroudis, M. Sahoo, Eds. Recent Findings in Intelligent Computing Techniques. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol 708, 2018, Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8636-6_6010.1007/978-981-10-8636-6_60 Search in Google Scholar

29. Ghaleb, B., A. Y. Al-Dubai, E. Ekonomou, A. Alsarhan, Y. Nasser, L. M. Mackenzie, A. Boukerche. A Survey of Limitations and Enhancements of the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks: A Focus on Core Operations. – IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, Vol. 21, 2019, No 2, pp. 1607-1635.10.1109/COMST.2018.2874356 Search in Google Scholar

30. Kechiche, I., I. Bousnina, A. Samet. An Overview on RPL Objective Function Enhancement Approaches. – In: Proc. of 7th International Conference on Communications and Networking, Comnet 2018-2019.10.1109/COMNET.2018.8622132 Search in Google Scholar

31. Al-Qassas, R. S. The Impact of Varying Sinks on Load Distribution in IoT Routing Under Static and Mobile Scenarios. – Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications (Formerly: Recent Patents on Computer Science), Vol. 14, 2021, No 9, pp. 2742-2753.10.2174/2666255813999200710132723 Search in Google Scholar

32. Airehrour, D., J. Gutierrez, S. K. Ray. Securing RPL Routing Protocol from Blackhole Attacks Using a Trust-Based Mechanism. – In: Proc. of 26th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC’16), 2016, pp. 115-120. DOI: 10.1109/ATNAC.2016.7878793.10.1109/ATNAC.2016.7878793 Search in Google Scholar

33. Al-Qassas, R. S., M. Ould-Khaoua. Performance Comparison of End-to-End and On-the-Spot Traffic-Aware Techniques. – International Journal of Communication Systems, Vol. 26, 2013, No 1, pp. 13-33.10.1002/dac.1327 Search in Google Scholar

34. Xie, H.-f., F. Zeng, G.-q. Zhang, D.-l. Su. Simulation Research on Routing Protocols in ZigBee Network. – In: Proc. of 6th International Asia Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Innovation, Paris, 2016, pp. 891-898.10.2991/978-94-6239-148-2_88 Search in Google Scholar

35. Gnawali, O., R. Fonseca, K. Jamieson, D. Moss, P. Levis. Collection Tree Protocol. – In: Proc. of 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys 2009, 2009, pp. 1-14.10.1145/1644038.1644040 Search in Google Scholar

36. Dawson-Haggerty, S., A. Tavakoli, D. Culler. Hydro: A Hybrid Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks. – In: Proc. of 1st IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, 2010, pp. 268-273. Search in Google Scholar

37. Fonseca, R., S. Ratnasamy, J. Zhao, C. T. Ee, D. Culler, S. Shenker, I. Stoica. Beacon Vector Routing: Scalable Point-to-Point Routing in Wireless Sensornets. – In: Proc. of 2nd Conference on Symposium on Networked Systems Design & Implementation, Vol. 2, 2005, pp. 329-342 Search in Google Scholar

38. Rao, A., S. Ratnasamy, C. Papadimitriou, S. Shenker, I. Stoica. Geographic Routing without Location Information. – In: Proc. of 9th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, San Diego, CA, USA, 2003, pp. 96-108.10.1145/938985.938996 Search in Google Scholar

39. Nguyen Thanh, L., N. D. Caro, W. Colitti, A. Touhafi, K. Steenhaut. Comparative Performance Study of RPL in Wireless Sensor Networks. – In: Proc. of 19th IEEE Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology in the Benelux (SCVT’12), 2012, pp. 1-6.10.1109/SCVT.2012.6399404 Search in Google Scholar

40. Karkazis, P., H. C. Leligou, L. Sarakis, T. Zahariadis, P. Trakadas, T. H. Velivassaki, C. Capsalis. Design of Primary and Composite Routing Metrics for RPL-Compliant Wireless Sensor Networks. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Telecommunications and Multimedia, 2012, pp. 13-18.10.1109/TEMU.2012.6294705 Search in Google Scholar

41. Chang, L. H., T. H. Lee, S. J. Chen, C. Y. Liao. Energy-Efficient Oriented Routing Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Networks. – In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2013, pp. 3813-3818.10.1109/SMC.2013.651 Search in Google Scholar

42. Abreu, C., M. Ricardo, P. M. Mendes. Energy-Aware Routing for Biomedical Wireless Sensor Networks. – Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Vol. 40, 2014, No 1, pp. 270-278.10.1016/j.jnca.2013.09.015 Search in Google Scholar

43. Chen, Y., J. P. Chanet, K. M. Hou, H. Shi, G. de Sousa. A Scalable Context-Aware Objective Function (SCAOF) of Routing Protocol for Agricultural Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPAL). – Sensors (Switzerland), Vol. 15, 2015, No 8, pp. 19507-19540.10.3390/s150819507457038326266411 Search in Google Scholar

44. Kamgueu, P.-O., E. Nataf, T. N. Djotio. On Design and Deployment of Fuzzy-Based Metric for Routing in Low-Power and Lossy Networks. – In: Proc. of IEEE 40th Local Computer Networks Conference Workshops (LCN Workshops), 2015, pp. 789-795.10.1109/LCNW.2015.7365929 Search in Google Scholar

45. Gaddour, O., A. Koubâa, N. Baccour, M. Abid. OF-FL: QoS-Aware Fuzzy Logic Objective Function for the RPL Routing Protocol. – In: Proc. of 12th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt), 2014, pp. 365-372. Search in Google Scholar

46. Lamaazi, H., N. Benamar. RPL Enhancement Using a New Objective Function Based on Combined Metrics. – In: Proc. of 13th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC’17), 2017, pp. 1459-1464.10.1109/IWCMC.2017.7986499 Search in Google Scholar

47. Harshavardhana, T. G., B. S. Vineeth, S. V. R. Anand, M. Hegde. Power Control and Cross-Layer Design of RPL Objective Function for Low Power and Lossy Networks. – In: Proc. of 10th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS’18), 2018, pp. 214-219.10.1109/COMSNETS.2018.8328200 Search in Google Scholar

48. Kim, H.-S., J. Paek, S. Bahk. QU-RPL: Queue Utilization Based RPL for Load Balancing in Large Scale Industrial Applications. – In: Proc. of 12th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON’15), 2015, pp. 265-273. Search in Google Scholar

49. Wang, Z., L. Zhang, Z. Zheng, J. Wang. An Optimized RPL Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. – In: Proc. of IEEE 22nd International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS’16), 2016, pp. 294-299.10.1109/ICPADS.2016.0047 Search in Google Scholar

50. Al-Kashoash, H. A., Y. Al-Nidawi, A. H. Kemp. Congestion-Aware RPL for 6L0WPAN Networks. – In: Proc. of Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS’16), 2016, pp. 1-6.10.1109/WTS.2016.7482026 Search in Google Scholar

51. Parasuram, A., D. Culler, R. Katz. An Analysis of the RPL Routing Standard for Low Power and Lossy Networks. – Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

52. Liu, X., J. Guo, G. Bhatti, P. Orlik, K. Parsons. Load Balanced Routing for Low Power and Lossy Networks. – In: Proc. of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC’13), 2013, pp. 2238-2243. Search in Google Scholar

53. Lodhi, M. A., A. Rehman, M. M. Khan, F. B. Hussain. Multiple Path RPL for Low Power Lossy Networks. – In: Proc. of APWiMob 2015 – IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Wireless and Mobile, 2016, pp. 279-284.10.1109/APWiMob.2015.7374975 Search in Google Scholar

54. Tang, W., X. Ma, J. Huang, J. Wei. Toward Improved RPL: A Congestion Avoidance Multipath Routing Protocol with Time Factor for Wireless Sensor Networks. – Journal of Sensors, Vol. 2016, 2016.10.1155/2016/8128651 Search in Google Scholar

55. Alishahi, M., M. H. Yaghmaee Moghaddam, H. R. Pourreza. Multi-Class Routing Protocol Using Virtualization and SDN-Enabled Architecture for Smart Grid. – Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, Vol. 11, 2018, No 3, pp. 380-396.10.1007/s12083-016-0537-1 Search in Google Scholar

56. Altwassi, H. S., Z. Pervez, K. Dahal, B. Ghaleb. The RPL Load Balancing in IoT Network with Burst Traffic Scenarios’. – In: Proc. of 12th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management & Applications (SKIMA’18), 2018, pp. 1-7.10.1109/SKIMA.2018.8631520 Search in Google Scholar

57. Ha, M., K. Kwon, D. Kim, P.-Y. Kong. Dynamic and Distributed Load Balancing Scheme in Multi-Gateway Based 6LoWPAN. – In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings), and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom), 2014, pp. 87-94.10.1109/iThings.2014.22 Search in Google Scholar

58. Nguyen, Q.-D., J. Montavont, N. Montavont, T. Noël. RPL Border Router Redundancy in the Internet of Things. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Ad hoc Networks and Wireless, 2016, pp. 202-214.10.1007/978-3-319-40509-4_14 Search in Google Scholar

59. Taghizadeh, S., H. Bobarshad, H. Elbiaze. CLRPL: Context-Aware and Load Balancing RPL for IoT Networks under Heavy and Highly Dynamic Load. – IEEE Access, Vol. 6, 2018, pp. 23277-23291.10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2817128 Search in Google Scholar

60. Lamaazi, H., N. Benamar. A Novel Approach for RPL Assessment Based on the Objective Function and Trickle Optimizations. – Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Vol. 2019, 2019, pp. 9. Search in Google Scholar

61. Vasseur, J., M. Kim, K. Pister, N. Dejean, D. Barthel. Routing Metrics Used for Path Calculation in Low-Power and Lossy Networks’, in Editor (Ed.)^(Eds.): ‘Book Routing Metrics Used for Path Calculation in Low-Power and Lossy Networks. – (IETF, 2012, Edn.), pp. 1-30. Search in Google Scholar

62. Gnawali, O., P. Levis. The Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function. – RFC, 2012, 6719.10.17487/rfc6719 Search in Google Scholar

63. Thubert, P. RFC 6552: Objective Fuction Zero for the Routing Pertocal for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL), 2012.10.17487/rfc6552 Search in Google Scholar

64. Jayakumar, G., G. Ganapathi. Reference Point Group Mobility and Random Waypoint Models in Performance Evaluation of MANET Routing Protocols. – Journal of Computer Systems, Networks, and Communications, Vol. 2008, 2008, pp. 13. Search in Google Scholar

65. Aschenbruck, N., R. Ernst, E. Gerhards-Padilla, M. Schwamborn. BonnMotion: A Mobility Scenario Generation and Analysis Tool. – In: Proc. of 3rd International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques, Torremolinos, Malaga, Spain, 2010, pp. 1-10. Search in Google Scholar

66. Lin, G., G. Noubir, R. Rajaraman. Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Simulation. – In: Proc. of Twenty-Third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM’04), 2004. Search in Google Scholar

67. Tomić, I., J. A. McCann. A Survey of Potential Security Issues in Existing Wireless Sensor Network Protocols. – IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol. 4, 2017, No 6, pp. 1910-1923.10.1109/JIOT.2017.2749883 Search in Google Scholar