[
1. Jenson, S. The Future IoT: Building Better Legos. – Computer, Vol. 50, 2017, No 2, pp. 68-71.10.1109/MC.2017.48
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Zanella, A., N. Bui, A. Castellani, L. Vangelista, M. Zorzi. Internet of Things for Smart Cities. – IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol. 1, 2014, No 1, pp. 22-32.10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Bello, O., S. Zeadally. Intelligent Device-to-Device Communication in the Internet of Things. – IEEE Systems Journal, Vol. 10, 2016, No 3, pp. 1172-1182.10.1109/JSYST.2014.2298837
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Xu, G., Y. Ding, J. Zhao, L. Hu, X. Fu. Research on the Internet of Things (IoT). – Sensors & Transducers, Vol. 160, 2013, No 12, p. 463.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Nawaratne, R., D. Alahakoon, D. De Silva, P. Chhetri, N. Chilamkurti. Self-Evolving Intelligent Algorithms for Facilitating Data Interoperability in IoT Environments. – Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 86, 2018, pp. 421-432.10.1016/j.future.2018.02.049
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Mostarda, L., A. Navarra, F. Nobili. Fast File Transfers from IoT Devices by Using Multiple Interfaces. – Sensors, Vol. 21, 2021, No 1, pp. 36.10.3390/s21010036779539533374796
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Qasaimeh, M., R. S. Al-Qassas, M. Ababneh. Software Design and Experimental Evaluation of a Reduced AES for IoT Applications. – Future Internet, Vol. 13, 2021, No 11, pp. 273.10.3390/fi13110273
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Sasidharan, D., L. Jacob. Design of Composite Routing Metrics in LOADng Routing Protocol for IoT Applications. – In: Proc. of ICN’2017, 2017, p. 26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Gomez, C., P. Salvatella, O. Alonso, J. Paradells. Tiny AODV: Adapting AODV for IEEE 802.15.4 Mesh Sensor Networks: Theoretical Discussion and Performance Evaluation in a Real Environment. – In: Proc. of International Symposium on on World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, 2006, pp. 159-170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Winter, T., P. Thubert, T. Clausen, J. Hui, R. Kelsey, P. Levis, K. Pister, R. Struik, J. Vasseur, R. Alexander. RPL: IPV6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks, RFC 6550. IETF ROLL WG, Tech. Rep., 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Qiu, T., Y. Lv, F. Xia, N. Chen, J. Wan, A. Tolba. ERGID: An Efficient Routing Protocol for Emergency Response Internet of Things. – Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Vol. 72, 2016, pp. 104-112.10.1016/j.jnca.2016.06.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Lahbib, A., K. Toumi, S. Elleuch, A. Laouiti, S. Martin. Link Reliable and Trust Aware RPL Routing Protocol for Internet of Things. – In: Proc. of 16th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA), 2017 IEEE, 2017, pp. 1-5.10.1109/NCA.2017.8171360
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Zikria, Y. B., M. K. Afzal, F. Ishmanov, S. W. Kim, H. Yu. A Survey on Routing Protocols Supported by the Contiki Internet of Things Operating System. – Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 82, 2018, pp. 200-219.10.1016/j.future.2017.12.045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Anamalamudi, S., A. R. Sangi, M. Alkatheiri, A. M. Ahmed. AODV Routing Protocol for Cognitive Radio Access Based Internet of Things (IoT). – Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 83, 2018, pp. 228-238.10.1016/j.future.2017.12.060
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Kim, H.-S., J. Ko, D. E. Culler, J. Paek. Challenging the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL): A Survey. – IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 19, 2017, No 4.10.1109/COMST.2017.2751617
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Borgia, E., R. Bruno, A. Passarella. Making Opportunistic Networks in IoT Environments CCN-Ready: A Performance Evaluation of the MobCCN Protocol. – Computer Communications, 2018.10.1016/j.comcom.2018.03.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Krishna, G. G., G. Krishna, N. Bhalaji. Analysis of Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks in IoT Real Time Applications. – Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 87, 2016, pp. 270-274.10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.160
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Umamaheswari, S., A. Negi. Internet of Things and RPL Routing Protocol: A Study and Evaluation. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI’17), 2017, pp. 1-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Liu, X., Z. Sheng, C. Yin, F. Ali, D. Roggen. Performance Analysis of Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) in Large Scale Networks. – IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol. 4, 2017, No 6, pp. 2172-2185.10.1109/JIOT.2017.2755980
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Mardini, W., S. Aljawarneh, A. Al-Abdi, H. Taamneh. Performance Evaluation of RPL Objective Functions for Different Sending Intervals. – In: Proc. of 6th International Symposium on Digital Forensic and Security (ISDFS’18), 2018, pp. 1-6.10.1109/ISDFS.2018.8355323
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Mardini, W., M. Ebrahim, M. Al-Rudaini. Comprehensive Performance Analysis of RPL Objective Functions in IoT Networks. – International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, Vol. 9, 2017, No 3, pp. 323-332.10.17762/ijcnis.v9i3.2515
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Lamaazi, H., N. Benamar. OF-EC: A Novel Energy Consumption Aware Objective Function for RPL Based on Fuzzy Logic. – Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Vol. 117, 2018, pp. 42-58.10.1016/j.jnca.2018.05.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Pradeska, N., N. W. Widyawan, S. S. Kusumawardani. Performance Analysis of Objective Function MRHOF and OF0 in Routing Protocol RPL IPV6 over Low Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPAN). – In: Proc. of 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering: Empowering Technology for Better Future, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Lamaazi, H., N. Benamar, A. J. Jara. Study of the Impact of Designed Objective Function on the RPL-Based Routing Protocol. – In: Advances in Ubiquitous Networking 2. Springer, 2017, pp. 67-80.10.1007/978-981-10-1627-1_6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Qasem, M., H. Altawssi, M. B. Yassien, A. Al-Dubai. Performance Evaluation of RPL Objective Functions. – In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 2015, pp. 1606-1613.10.1109/CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM.2015.242
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Wadhaj, I., I. Kristof, I. Romdhani, A. Al-Dubai. Performance Evaluation of the RPL Protocol in Fixed and Mobile Sink Low-Power and Lossy-Networks. – In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 2015, pp. 1600-1605.10.1109/CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM.2015.241
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Saad, L. B., B. Tourancheau. Sinks Mobility Strategy in IPv6-Based WSNs for Network Lifetime Improvement. – In: Proc. of 4th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security, 2011, pp. 1-5.10.1109/NTMS.2011.5720597
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Sanshi, S., C. D. Jaidhar. Assessment of Objective Functions under Mobility in RPL. – In: P. Sa, S. Bakshi, I. Hatzilygeroudis, M. Sahoo, Eds. Recent Findings in Intelligent Computing Techniques. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol 708, 2018, Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8636-6_6010.1007/978-981-10-8636-6_60
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Ghaleb, B., A. Y. Al-Dubai, E. Ekonomou, A. Alsarhan, Y. Nasser, L. M. Mackenzie, A. Boukerche. A Survey of Limitations and Enhancements of the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks: A Focus on Core Operations. – IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, Vol. 21, 2019, No 2, pp. 1607-1635.10.1109/COMST.2018.2874356
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Kechiche, I., I. Bousnina, A. Samet. An Overview on RPL Objective Function Enhancement Approaches. – In: Proc. of 7th International Conference on Communications and Networking, Comnet 2018-2019.10.1109/COMNET.2018.8622132
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Al-Qassas, R. S. The Impact of Varying Sinks on Load Distribution in IoT Routing Under Static and Mobile Scenarios. – Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications (Formerly: Recent Patents on Computer Science), Vol. 14, 2021, No 9, pp. 2742-2753.10.2174/2666255813999200710132723
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Airehrour, D., J. Gutierrez, S. K. Ray. Securing RPL Routing Protocol from Blackhole Attacks Using a Trust-Based Mechanism. – In: Proc. of 26th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC’16), 2016, pp. 115-120. DOI: 10.1109/ATNAC.2016.7878793.10.1109/ATNAC.2016.7878793
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Al-Qassas, R. S., M. Ould-Khaoua. Performance Comparison of End-to-End and On-the-Spot Traffic-Aware Techniques. – International Journal of Communication Systems, Vol. 26, 2013, No 1, pp. 13-33.10.1002/dac.1327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Xie, H.-f., F. Zeng, G.-q. Zhang, D.-l. Su. Simulation Research on Routing Protocols in ZigBee Network. – In: Proc. of 6th International Asia Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Innovation, Paris, 2016, pp. 891-898.10.2991/978-94-6239-148-2_88
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Gnawali, O., R. Fonseca, K. Jamieson, D. Moss, P. Levis. Collection Tree Protocol. – In: Proc. of 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys 2009, 2009, pp. 1-14.10.1145/1644038.1644040
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Dawson-Haggerty, S., A. Tavakoli, D. Culler. Hydro: A Hybrid Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks. – In: Proc. of 1st IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, 2010, pp. 268-273.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Fonseca, R., S. Ratnasamy, J. Zhao, C. T. Ee, D. Culler, S. Shenker, I. Stoica. Beacon Vector Routing: Scalable Point-to-Point Routing in Wireless Sensornets. – In: Proc. of 2nd Conference on Symposium on Networked Systems Design & Implementation, Vol. 2, 2005, pp. 329-342
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Rao, A., S. Ratnasamy, C. Papadimitriou, S. Shenker, I. Stoica. Geographic Routing without Location Information. – In: Proc. of 9th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, San Diego, CA, USA, 2003, pp. 96-108.10.1145/938985.938996
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Nguyen Thanh, L., N. D. Caro, W. Colitti, A. Touhafi, K. Steenhaut. Comparative Performance Study of RPL in Wireless Sensor Networks. – In: Proc. of 19th IEEE Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology in the Benelux (SCVT’12), 2012, pp. 1-6.10.1109/SCVT.2012.6399404
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Karkazis, P., H. C. Leligou, L. Sarakis, T. Zahariadis, P. Trakadas, T. H. Velivassaki, C. Capsalis. Design of Primary and Composite Routing Metrics for RPL-Compliant Wireless Sensor Networks. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Telecommunications and Multimedia, 2012, pp. 13-18.10.1109/TEMU.2012.6294705
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Chang, L. H., T. H. Lee, S. J. Chen, C. Y. Liao. Energy-Efficient Oriented Routing Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Networks. – In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2013, pp. 3813-3818.10.1109/SMC.2013.651
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Abreu, C., M. Ricardo, P. M. Mendes. Energy-Aware Routing for Biomedical Wireless Sensor Networks. – Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Vol. 40, 2014, No 1, pp. 270-278.10.1016/j.jnca.2013.09.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Chen, Y., J. P. Chanet, K. M. Hou, H. Shi, G. de Sousa. A Scalable Context-Aware Objective Function (SCAOF) of Routing Protocol for Agricultural Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPAL). – Sensors (Switzerland), Vol. 15, 2015, No 8, pp. 19507-19540.10.3390/s150819507457038326266411
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Kamgueu, P.-O., E. Nataf, T. N. Djotio. On Design and Deployment of Fuzzy-Based Metric for Routing in Low-Power and Lossy Networks. – In: Proc. of IEEE 40th Local Computer Networks Conference Workshops (LCN Workshops), 2015, pp. 789-795.10.1109/LCNW.2015.7365929
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Gaddour, O., A. Koubâa, N. Baccour, M. Abid. OF-FL: QoS-Aware Fuzzy Logic Objective Function for the RPL Routing Protocol. – In: Proc. of 12th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt), 2014, pp. 365-372.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Lamaazi, H., N. Benamar. RPL Enhancement Using a New Objective Function Based on Combined Metrics. – In: Proc. of 13th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC’17), 2017, pp. 1459-1464.10.1109/IWCMC.2017.7986499
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Harshavardhana, T. G., B. S. Vineeth, S. V. R. Anand, M. Hegde. Power Control and Cross-Layer Design of RPL Objective Function for Low Power and Lossy Networks. – In: Proc. of 10th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS’18), 2018, pp. 214-219.10.1109/COMSNETS.2018.8328200
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Kim, H.-S., J. Paek, S. Bahk. QU-RPL: Queue Utilization Based RPL for Load Balancing in Large Scale Industrial Applications. – In: Proc. of 12th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON’15), 2015, pp. 265-273.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Wang, Z., L. Zhang, Z. Zheng, J. Wang. An Optimized RPL Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. – In: Proc. of IEEE 22nd International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS’16), 2016, pp. 294-299.10.1109/ICPADS.2016.0047
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Al-Kashoash, H. A., Y. Al-Nidawi, A. H. Kemp. Congestion-Aware RPL for 6L0WPAN Networks. – In: Proc. of Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS’16), 2016, pp. 1-6.10.1109/WTS.2016.7482026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Parasuram, A., D. Culler, R. Katz. An Analysis of the RPL Routing Standard for Low Power and Lossy Networks. – Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Liu, X., J. Guo, G. Bhatti, P. Orlik, K. Parsons. Load Balanced Routing for Low Power and Lossy Networks. – In: Proc. of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC’13), 2013, pp. 2238-2243.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Lodhi, M. A., A. Rehman, M. M. Khan, F. B. Hussain. Multiple Path RPL for Low Power Lossy Networks. – In: Proc. of APWiMob 2015 – IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Wireless and Mobile, 2016, pp. 279-284.10.1109/APWiMob.2015.7374975
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Tang, W., X. Ma, J. Huang, J. Wei. Toward Improved RPL: A Congestion Avoidance Multipath Routing Protocol with Time Factor for Wireless Sensor Networks. – Journal of Sensors, Vol. 2016, 2016.10.1155/2016/8128651
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Alishahi, M., M. H. Yaghmaee Moghaddam, H. R. Pourreza. Multi-Class Routing Protocol Using Virtualization and SDN-Enabled Architecture for Smart Grid. – Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, Vol. 11, 2018, No 3, pp. 380-396.10.1007/s12083-016-0537-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Altwassi, H. S., Z. Pervez, K. Dahal, B. Ghaleb. The RPL Load Balancing in IoT Network with Burst Traffic Scenarios’. – In: Proc. of 12th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management & Applications (SKIMA’18), 2018, pp. 1-7.10.1109/SKIMA.2018.8631520
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Ha, M., K. Kwon, D. Kim, P.-Y. Kong. Dynamic and Distributed Load Balancing Scheme in Multi-Gateway Based 6LoWPAN. – In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings), and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom), 2014, pp. 87-94.10.1109/iThings.2014.22
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Nguyen, Q.-D., J. Montavont, N. Montavont, T. Noël. RPL Border Router Redundancy in the Internet of Things. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Ad hoc Networks and Wireless, 2016, pp. 202-214.10.1007/978-3-319-40509-4_14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Taghizadeh, S., H. Bobarshad, H. Elbiaze. CLRPL: Context-Aware and Load Balancing RPL for IoT Networks under Heavy and Highly Dynamic Load. – IEEE Access, Vol. 6, 2018, pp. 23277-23291.10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2817128
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Lamaazi, H., N. Benamar. A Novel Approach for RPL Assessment Based on the Objective Function and Trickle Optimizations. – Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Vol. 2019, 2019, pp. 9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. Vasseur, J., M. Kim, K. Pister, N. Dejean, D. Barthel. Routing Metrics Used for Path Calculation in Low-Power and Lossy Networks’, in Editor (Ed.)^(Eds.): ‘Book Routing Metrics Used for Path Calculation in Low-Power and Lossy Networks. – (IETF, 2012, Edn.), pp. 1-30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. Gnawali, O., P. Levis. The Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function. – RFC, 2012, 6719.10.17487/rfc6719
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Thubert, P. RFC 6552: Objective Fuction Zero for the Routing Pertocal for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL), 2012.10.17487/rfc6552
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. Jayakumar, G., G. Ganapathi. Reference Point Group Mobility and Random Waypoint Models in Performance Evaluation of MANET Routing Protocols. – Journal of Computer Systems, Networks, and Communications, Vol. 2008, 2008, pp. 13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. Aschenbruck, N., R. Ernst, E. Gerhards-Padilla, M. Schwamborn. BonnMotion: A Mobility Scenario Generation and Analysis Tool. – In: Proc. of 3rd International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques, Torremolinos, Malaga, Spain, 2010, pp. 1-10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
66. Lin, G., G. Noubir, R. Rajaraman. Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Simulation. – In: Proc. of Twenty-Third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM’04), 2004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
67. Tomić, I., J. A. McCann. A Survey of Potential Security Issues in Existing Wireless Sensor Network Protocols. – IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol. 4, 2017, No 6, pp. 1910-1923.10.1109/JIOT.2017.2749883
]Search in Google Scholar