How Phishing Pages Look Like?

1. The Human Factor: People-Centered Threats Define the Landscape [Internet]. Proofpoint, 2018. https://www.proofpoint.com/us/human-factor-2018Search in Google Scholar

2. Lazar, L. Our Analysis of 1,019 Phishing Kits – Blog | Imperva. – In: Blog | Imperva [Internet]. 4 January 2018 [cited 4 July 2018]. https://www.imperva.com/blog/2018/01/our-analysis-of-1019-phishing-kits/Search in Google Scholar

3. Maurer, M.-E., D. Herzner. Using Visual Website Similarity for Phishing Detection and Reporting. – CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2012, pp. 1625-1630.10.1145/2212776.2223683Search in Google Scholar

4. Afroz, S., R. Greenstadt. PhishZoo: Detecting Phishing Websites by Looking at Them. – In: 2011 IEEE 5th International Conference on Semantic Computing, 2011, pp. 368-375.10.1109/ICSC.2011.52Search in Google Scholar

5. Chen, T.-C., S. Dick, J. Miller. Detecting Visually Similar Web Pages: Application to Phishing Detection. – ACM Trans. Internet Technol., New York, NY, USA, ACM, Vol. 10, 2010, pp. 5:1-5:38.10.1145/1754393.1754394Search in Google Scholar

6. Medvet, E., E. Kirda, C. Kruegel. Visual-Similarity-Based Phishing Detection. – In: Proc. of 4th International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Netowrks, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2008, pp. 22:1-22:6.10.1145/1460877.1460905Search in Google Scholar

7. Lowe, D. G. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. – Int. J. Comput. Vis., Vol. 60, 2004, pp. 91-110.10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94Search in Google Scholar

8. Bay, H., A. Ess, T. Tuytelaars, L. Van Gool. Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF). – Comput Vis Image Underst., Vol. 110, 2008, pp. 346-359.10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014Search in Google Scholar

9. Medvet, E., A. Bartoli, G. Davanzo, A. D. Lorenzo. Automatic Face Annotation in News Images by Mining the Web. – In: Proc. of 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 2011, pp. 47-54.10.1109/WI-IAT.2011.101Search in Google Scholar

10. De Lorenzo, A., E. Medvet, F. Tarlao, A. Bartoli. Personalized, Browser-Based Visual Phishing Detection Based on Deep Learning. – In: Proc. of 13th International Conference on Risks and Security of Internet and Systems (CRiSIS).Search in Google Scholar

11. Chen, T.-C., T. Stepan, S. Dick, J. Miller. An Anti-Phishing System Employing Diffused Information. – ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur., New York, NY, USA, ACM, Vol. 16, 2014, pp. 16:1-16:31.10.1145/2584680Search in Google Scholar

12. Cilibrasi, R., P. M. B. Vitanyi. Clustering by Compression. – IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE Press, Vol. 51, 2005, pp. 1523-1545.10.1109/TIT.2005.844059Search in Google Scholar

13. Vázquez, P.-P., J. Marco. Using Normalized Compression Distance for Image Similarity Measurement: An Experimental Study. – Vis. Comput., Vol. 28, 2012, pp. 1063-1084.10.1007/s00371-011-0651-2Search in Google Scholar

14. Axelsson, S. Using Normalized Compression Distance for Classifying File Fragments. – In: Proc. of 2010 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, 2010, pp. 641-646.10.1109/ARES.2010.100Search in Google Scholar

15. Telles, G. P., R. Minghim, F. V. Paulovich. Normalized Compression Distance for Visual Analysis of Document Collections. – Comput. Graph., Vol. 31, 2007, pp. 327-337.10.1016/j.cag.2007.01.024Search in Google Scholar

16. Bartoli, A., G. Davanzo, E. Medvet. The Reaction Time to Web Site Defacements. – IEEE Internet Comput, Vol. 13, 2009, pp. 52-58. ieeexplore.ieee.org10.1109/MIC.2009.91Search in Google Scholar