[
Aarno, A. (1996), Õiguse tõlgendamise teooria [The theory of legal intepretation], Tallinn: Avatud Eesti Fond.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allahyari, M.; Pouriyeh, S.; Assefi, M; Safaei, S.; Trippe, E. D.; Gutierrez, J. B. & Kochut, K. (2017), ‘A brief survey of text mining: Classification, clustering and extraction techniques,’ 23rd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD2017, Halifax Nova Scotia, Canada, August 13–17, 2017. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.02919.pdf [accessed 27 Feb 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Council Directive (EU) no. 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 on laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market (ATAD), OJ L 193, 19.7.2016, pp. 1–14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Council Directive (EU) no. 2017/952 of 29 May 2017 amending Directive (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries (ATAD II), OJ L 144, 7.6.2017, pp. 1–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frey, C. B. & Osborne, M. A. (2017), ‘The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerization?’ Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 114, pp. 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.01910.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Helsgaun, K. (2019), ‘Ten project proposals in artificial intelligence.’ Retrieved from http://akira.ruc.dk/~keld/teaching/Projektforslag/AI_Projects.pdf [accessed 25 Feb 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hill, R. K. (2016), ‘What an algorithm is,’ Philosophy & Technology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-014-0184-510.1007/s13347-014-0184-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Jong, S. & Derksen, S. (2019), ‘Binary translation of legislation and case law—A Deep Learning dive into the possibilities of natural language processing for legislation and case law,’ Research paper, Tax & Technology Pt. II, Tilburg University, 14 June.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jordan, M. I. & Mitchell, T. M. (2015), ‘Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects’ Science, vol. 349, no. 6245, pp. 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa841510.1126/science.aaa841526185243
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kõrgessaar v. Tax Board [2001], Administrative Chamber of the Estonian Supreme Court, no. 3-3-1-57-00, 15.1.2001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Künnapas, K. (2020), ‘Dysfunctionality from the sovereignty conflict in the ATAD GAAR,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 10, no. 1(30), pp. 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-000610.1515/bjes-2020-0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuzniacki, B. (2018), ‘The artificial intelligence tax treaty assistant: decoding the principal purpose test,’ Bulletin for International Taxation, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 524–534, IFBD Online Journals.10.2139/ssrn.3235151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuzniacki, B. (2021), ‘Poland’s implementation of EU GAAR compromises constitutional and EU principles,’ Intertax, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 237–253.10.54648/TAXI2021022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Longarte, I. (2020), ‘Embedding AI and blockchain into next-generation tax policy design,’ LawAhead. Retrieved from https://lawahead.ie.edu/embedding-a-iand-block-chain-in-the-next-generation-digitalized-economy-tax-policy-design/ [accessed 10 Jan 2020]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maret Lilleorg v. Tax Board [2012], Administrative Chamber of the Estonian Supreme Court, no. 3-3-1-79-11, 13.2.2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marge Sirge v. Tax Board [2011], Administrative Chamber of the Estonian Supreme Court, no. 3-3-1-15-11, 25.4.2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mittelstadt, B. D.; Allo, P.; Taddeo, M.; Wachter, S. & Floridi, L. (2016), ‘The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate,’ Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/205395171667967910.1177/2053951716679679
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Narits, R. (2004), Õiguse entsüklopeedia [Encyclopaedia of law], Tallinn: Juura.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v. Russia [2011], ECHR 14902/04, 20.10.2011.10.1016/S1353-4858(11)70110-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD (2014), Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy, OECD/G29 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, OECD Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD (2019), OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed version 2017, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/mtc_cond-2017-en10.1787/mtc_cond-2017-en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pianatavigna, P. (2018), ‘The role of the subjective element in tax abuse and aggressive tax planning,’ World Tax Journal, vol. 10, no. 2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts, European Commission, 2021/0106 (COD), 21.4.2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raso, F. A.; Hilligoss, H.; Krishnamurthy, V.; Bavitz, C. & Kim, L. (2018), Artificial Intelligence & Human Rights: Opportunities & Risks, The Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Publication Series, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.325934410.2139/ssrn.3259344
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Solarte-Vásquez, M. C. & Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2017), ‘Smart contracting: A multidisciplinary and proactive approach for the EU digital single market,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 7, no. 2(23), pp. 208–246. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-001710.1515/bjes-2017-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Wilde, M. F. (2018), ‘Is the ATAD’s GAAR a Pandora’s Box?’ in P. Pistone & D. Weber (eds.) The Implementation of Anti-BEPS Rules in the EU: A Comprehensive Study, Amsterdam: IBFD Online Books, pp. 301–328.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yale Law School, Information Society Project & Immuta (2017), Governing Machine Learning. Exploring the Intersection Between Machine Learning, Law, and Regulation. Retrieved from https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/center/isp/documents/governing_machine_learning_-_final.pdf [accessed 15 Jan 2020]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yan, C. (2019), ‘Economic substance: a machine learning perspective on the multi-factorial analysis,’ Blue J legal, 22 April. Retrieved from https://www.bluejlegal.com/blog/economic-substance-machine-learning-analysis [accessed 25 Feb 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zalnieriute, M.; Moses, L. B. & Williams, G. (2019), ‘The rule of law and automation of government decision-making,’ The Modern Law Review, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 425–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.1241210.1111/1468-2230.12412
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zimmer, F. (2019), ‘In defence of general anti-avoidance rules,’ Bulletin of International Taxation, vol. 73, no. 4, IFBD Online Journals.
]Search in Google Scholar
