[Anee, I.J., Alam, S., Begum, A., Shahjahan, R.M., Khandaker, A.M., 2021. The role of probiotics on animal health and nutrition. JoBAZ, 82(52), 1-16.10.1186/s41936-021-00250-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakari, D., Tatsadjieu, N.L., Mbawala, A., Mbofung, C.M., 2011. Assessment of physiological properties of some lactic acid bacteria isolated from the intestine of chickens use as probiotics and antimicrobial agents against enteropathogenic bacteria. Innov Rom Food Biotechnol. 8, 33–40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bedford, M.R., Partridge, G.G., 2001. Enzymes in farm animal nutrition. 2nd edition. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data, UK.10.1079/9780851993935.0000]Search in Google Scholar
[Ciurescu, G., Dumitru, M., Gheorghe, A., Untea, A., Drăghici, R., 2020. Effect of Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, bone mineralization, and bacterial population of broilers fed with different protein sources. Poult Sci. 99, 5960–5971.10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.075764791033142513]Search in Google Scholar
[Deutscher, J., 2008. The mechanisms of carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 11, 87–93.10.1016/j.mib.2008.02.00718359269]Search in Google Scholar
[Dumitru, M. Vodnar D.C., Elemer, S., Ciurescu, G., Habeanu, M., Sorescu, I., Georgescu, S.E., Dudu, A., 2021a. Evaluation of non-encapsulated and microencapsulated lactic acid bacteria. Appl Sci. 11, 1-15.10.3390/app11219867]Search in Google Scholar
[Dumitru, M., Ciurescu, G., Sorescu, I., 2020. In vitro evaluation of some probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from chickens' gut. Scientific Papers: Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 53(1), 44-51.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dumitru, M., Habeanu, M., Sorescu, I., Tabuc, C., 2021b. Bacillus spp. as a supplemental probiotic in diets for weaned piglets. S Afr J Anim Sci. 51(5), 578-586.10.4314/sajas.v51i5.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Dumitru, M., Sorescu, I., Ciurescu, G., Habeanu M., 2021. Isolation, identification, preservation and determinations of lactic acid bacteria from chicken's gut content at 26 days old. Rom Biotech. Lett. 26(4), 2765-2772.10.25083/rbl/26.4/2765-2772]Search in Google Scholar
[Dumitru, M., Sorescu, I., Jurcoane, Ş., Cîmpeanu, G., Tabuc, C., Hăbeanu, M., 2017. Assesing of morpfological, cultural, biochimical profile and enzymatic activity of a Lactobacillus paracasei CCM 1837 strain. Academy of Romanian Scientists, Ann Biol Sci. 6(2), 22-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dumitru, M., Tabuc, C., Jurcoane, Ş., 2016. Evaluarea activității enzimatice a unor specii bacteriene utilizate în biopreparate enzimatice pentru hrana animalelor. Analele IBNA, 31, 93-101, Baloteşti.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dumitru, M., Tabuc, C., Jurcoane, S., 2018. Obtaining a feed additive based of Lactobacillus plantarum strain. Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy, LXI(2), 115-122. ISSN 2285-5785.]Search in Google Scholar
[Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO, 2006). Probiotics in food. Health and nutritional properties and guidelines for evaluation. Paper 85. Chapter, Guidelines for the assessment of probiotic microorganisms”, 4. www.fao.org/3/a0512e/a0512e.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fossi, B.T., Tavea, F., 2013. Application of amylolytic Lactobacillus fermentum 04BBA19 in fermentation for simultaneous production of thermostable α-amylase and lactic acid. Chapter 27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ho, J.C.K., Yin Sze, L., 2018. Isolation, identification and characterization of enzyme-producing lactic acid bacteria from traditional fermented foods. Bioscience Horizons: Int J Stud Res. 11, 1-11.10.1093/biohorizons/hzy004]Search in Google Scholar
[Holt, J.G., 1984. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoque, M.Z., Akter, F., Hossain, K.M., Rahman, M.S.M., Billah, M.M., Islam K.M.D., 2010. Isolation, identification and analysis of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus spp. from selective regional yoghurts. WJDFS 5(1), 39-46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jurcoane, Ş., Diguță F.C., Groposila, C.D.G., 2006. General Biotechnology. Practical Applied, Bucharest.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kabir, S.M., Mushfiqur Rahman, S.M., Neogi, S.B., Rahman, M., Khan, M.S.R., 2016. Isolation, identification, molecular characterization and screening of probiotic activities of Lactobacillus species from poultry sources at live bird markets in Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Asian Australas J Biosci Biotechnol. 1(1), 54-65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kareem, K.Y., Loh, T.C., Foo, H.L., Akit, H., Samsudin, A.A., 2016. Effects of dietary postbiotic and inulin on growth performance, IGF1 and GHR mRNA expression, faecal microbiota and volatile fatty acids in broilers. BMC Veter Res. 12(163), 1-10.10.1186/s12917-016-0790-9497480227496016]Search in Google Scholar
[Kizerwetter-Swida, M., Bineak, M., 2016. Assessment of potentially probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from chickens. Pol J Vet Sci. 19(1), 15-20.10.1515/pjvs-2016-000327096783]Search in Google Scholar
[Klaenhammer, T.R. De Vos, W.M., 2011. An incredible scientific journey. The evolutionary tale of the lactic acid bacteria. In: Ledeboer A, Hugenholtz J, Kok J, Konings W, Wouters J (ed.) The 10th LAB symposium. Thirty years of research on lactic acid bacteria. 24 Media Labs, 1-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Latorre, J.D., Velasco, X.H., Wolfenden, R.E., Vicente, J.L., Wolfenden, A.D., Menconi, A., Bielke, L.R., Hargis, B.M., Tellez, G., 2016. Evaluation and selection of Bacillus species based on Enzyme Production, antimicrobial activity, and biofilm synthesis as direct-fed microbial candidates for poultry. Front Vet Sci. 3(95), 1-9, USA.10.3389/fvets.2016.00095507132127812526]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, F.H., Wan, S. Y., Foo, H. L., Loh, T. C., Mohamad, R., Abdul Rahim, R., & Idrus, Z., 2019. Comparative study of extracellular proteolytic, cellulolytic, and hemicellulolytic enzyme activities and biotransformation of palm kernel cake biomass by lactic acid bacteria isolated from Malaysian foods. IJMS, 20(20), 4979. doi:10.3390/ijms2020497910.3390/ijms20204979683414931600952]Search in Google Scholar
[Lim, Y.H., Foo, H.L., Loh, T.C., Mohamad, R., Abdullah, N., 2019. Comparative studies of versatile extracellular proteolytic activities of lactic acid bacteria and their potential for extracellular amino acid productions as feed supplements. J Anim Sci.Biotechnol. 10(15), 1-13.10.1186/s40104-019-0323-z640436930886709]Search in Google Scholar
[Loh, T.C., Thanh, N., Foo, H.L., Hair-Bejo, M., 2013. Effects of feeding metabolite combinations from Lactobacillus plantarum on plasma and breast meat lipids in Broiler Chickens. Braz J Poult Sci. 15, 307–316.10.1590/S1516-635X2013000400004]Search in Google Scholar
[MacFaddin, J.F., 2000. Biochemical tests for identification of medical bacteria. 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mannam, S.J., Rezwan, R., Rahman, M., Begum, K., 2017. Isolation and biochemical characterization of Lactobacillus species from yogurt and cheese samples in dhaka metropolitan area. Bangladesh J Pharmacol. 20(1), 27-33.10.3329/bpj.v20i1.32090]Search in Google Scholar
[Menconi, A., Morgan, M. J., Pumford, N.R., Hargis, B.M., Tellez, G., 2013a. Physiological properties and Salmonella growth inhibition of probiotic Bacillus strains isolated from environmental and poultry sources. Int J Bacteriol. 1–8.10.1155/2013/958408474548326904728]Search in Google Scholar
[Na-Kyoung, L., Yun, C.W., Kim, S.W., Chang, H.I., Kang,, C.W., Paik H.D., 2008. Screening of lactobacilli derived from chicken feces and partial characterization of Lactobacillus acidophilus A12 as animal probiotics. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 18(2), 338–342.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oguntoyinbo, F.A., Narbad, A., 2015. Multifuctional properties of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from fermented cereal foods. J. Funct. Foods, 17, 621-631.10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.022]Search in Google Scholar
[Olufemi, F.O., Chijioke, O.M., Popoola, S.T., Oluwafemi, O.F., 2018. In vitro study of potential probiotic lactic acid Bacteria isolated from the gut of chickens in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Alexandria J Vet Sci. 58(1), 73–84.10.5455/ajvs.290499]Search in Google Scholar
[Padmavathi, T., Bhargavi, R., Priyanka, P.R., Niranjan, N.R., Pavitra, P.V., 2018. Screening of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria and production of amylase and its partial purification. J Genet Eng and Biotechnol. 16(2), 357–362.10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.03.005635375130733746]Search in Google Scholar
[Pieper, R., Janczyk, P., Schumann, R., Souffrant, W.B., 2006. The intestinal microflora of piglets around weaning – with emphasis on lactobacilli. Archiva Zootechnica, 9, 28-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prieto, M.L., O’Sullivan, L., Tan, S.P., McLoughlin, P., Hughes, H., Gutierrez, M., Jonathan, A., Lane, J., Hickey, R.M.G., Lawlor, P.G., Gardiner, G.E., 2014. In vitro assessment of marine Bacillus for use as livestock probiotics. Mar Drugs 12, 2422–2445.10.3390/md12052422405229824796302]Search in Google Scholar
[Reuben, R.C., Roy, P.C., Sarkar, S.L., Alam, R.-U., Jahid, I.K., 2019. Isolation, characterization, and assessment of lactic acid bacteria toward their selection as poultry probiotics. BMC Microbiology, 19(1), 1-20.10.1186/s12866-019-1626-0685290931718570]Search in Google Scholar
[Richards, J.D., Gong, J., C.F.M. de Lange, 2005. The gastrointestinal microbiota and its role in monogastric nutrition and health with an emphasis on pigs: current undestanding, possible modulations, and new techologies for ecological studies. Novus International. Can J Anim Sci. 85(4), 421-435.10.4141/A05-049]Search in Google Scholar
[Seker, E., 2010. Identification of Candida species isolated from bovine mastitis milk and their in vitro hemolytic activity in Western Turkey. Mycopathologia, 169, 303–308.10.1007/s11046-009-9255-z19921462]Search in Google Scholar
[Singh, S.K., Ahmed, S.U., Pandey, A., 2006. Metabolic engineering approaches for lactic acid production. Process Biochem. 41(5), 991–1000.10.1016/j.procbio.2005.12.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Sorescu, I., Dumitru, M., Ciurescu, G., 2019. Lactobacillus spp. and Enterococcus faecium strains isolation, identification, preservation and quantitative determinations from turkey gut content. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 24, 41–49.10.25083/rbl/24.1/41.49]Search in Google Scholar
[Sorescu, I., Dumitru, M., Ciurescu, G., 2021. Lactobacillus spp. strains isolation, identification, preservation and quantitative determinations from gut content of 45 days old chickens. Rev Bras Cienc Avic. 23(1), 1-7.10.1590/1806-9061-2020-1378]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoica, C., Sorescu, I., 2017. ABIS online - Advanced Bacterial Identification Software, an original tool for phenotypic bacterial identification. Regnum Prokaryotae - www.tgw1916.net.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sun, Q., Gao, F., Zhu, Y.U., Tao, Y., Zhao, S., Cai, Y., 2012. Fermentation quality and chemical composition of shrub silage treated with lactic acid bacteria inoculants and cellulase additives. Anim. Sci. J., 83, 305–309.10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00962.x22515690]Search in Google Scholar
[Tarraran, L., Mazzoli, R., 2018. Alternative strategies for lignocellulose fermentation through lactic acid bacteria: the state of the art and perspectives. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(15), 1-14.10.1093/femsle/fny12630007320]Search in Google Scholar
[Vamanu, A., Popa, O., Câmpeanu, Gh., Dumitru, I.F., 2015. Biological, biotechnological and pharmacological studies on the use of probiotic products.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walter, J., 2008. Ecological role of Lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: implication for fundametal and biomedical research. Minireviews. Appl Environ Microbiol. 74(16), 4985-4996, Nebraska.10.1128/AEM.00753-08251928618539818]Search in Google Scholar
[Yelnetty, A., Purnomo. H., Mirah, P.A., 2014. Biochemical characteristics of lactic acid bacteria with proteolytic activity and capability as starter culture isolated from spontaneous fermented local goat milk. J Nat Sci Res. 4(10),137-147.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhao, C., Wang, L., Ma, G., Jiang, X., Yang, J., Lv, J., Zhang, Y., 2021. Cellulase interacts with lactic acid bacteria to affect fermentation quality, microbial community, and ruminal degradability in mixed silage of soybean residue and corn stover. Animals, 11(2), 334.10.3390/ani11020334791221733525728]Search in Google Scholar