Accesso libero

Visual application of the American Board of Orthodontics grading system

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Tahir E, Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ. An assessment of treatment outcome in American Board of Orthodontics cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:335–42. Search in Google Scholar

Shaw WC, Richmond S, O’Brien KD, Brook P, Stephens CD. Quality control in Orthodontics: indices of treatment need and treatment standards. Brit Dent J 1991;170: 107–12. Search in Google Scholar

Otuyemi OD, Jones SP. Methods of assessing and grading malocclusion: a review. Aust Orthod J 1995;14:21–7. Search in Google Scholar

Lobb WK, Ismail AI, Andrews CL, Spracklin TE. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:70–5. Search in Google Scholar

Daniels CP, Richmond S. International comparisons of professional assessments in orthodontics: Part 2 – treatment outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113: 324–8. Search in Google Scholar

Massler M, Frankel JM. Prevalence of malocclusion in children aged 14 to 18 years. Am J Orthod 1951;37:751–68. Search in Google Scholar

Summers CJ. A system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. The Occlusal Index. Doctoral thesis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan 1996. Search in Google Scholar

Dyken RA, Sadowsky PL, Hurst D. Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the Peer Assessment Rating Index. Angle Orthod 2001;71:164–9. Search in Google Scholar

Hermanson PC, Grewe JM. Examiner variability of several malocclusion indices. Angle Orthod 1970;40:219–25. Search in Google Scholar

Grewe JM, Hagan DV. Malocclusion indices: a comparative evaluation. Am J Orthod 1972;61:286–94. Search in Google Scholar

Pickering EA, Vig P. The occlusal index to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1975; 2:47–51. Search in Google Scholar

Elderton RJ, Clark JD. Orthodontic treatment in the General Dental Services assessed by the Occlusal Index. Br J Orthod 1983;10:178–86. Search in Google Scholar

Eismann D. Reliable assessment of morphological changes resulting from orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1980;2:19–25. Search in Google Scholar

Berg, R. Post-retention analysis of treatment problems and failures in 264 consecutively treated cases. Eur J Orthod 1979;1:55–68. Search in Google Scholar

Hickham J in Gottlieb E. Grading your orthodontic treatment results. J Clin Orthod 1975;9:155–61. Search in Google Scholar

Carlos JP. Evaluation of indices of malocclusion. Int Dent J 1970;20:606–17. Search in Google Scholar

Draker HL. Judgements of peers in assessing the orthodontic handicap. J Public Health Dent 1970;30:134–40. Search in Google Scholar

Willems G, Heidbuchel R, Verdonck A, Carels C. Treatment and standard evaluation using the Peer Assessment Rating Index. Clin Oral Investig 2001; 5:57–62. Search in Google Scholar

Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11: 309–20. Search in Google Scholar

Firestone RA, Hasler RH, Ingervall B. Treatment results in dental school orthodontic patients in 1983 and 1993. Angle Orthod 1999;69:19–26. Search in Google Scholar

Richmond S, Shaw WC, Stephens CD, Webb WG, Roberts CT, Andrews M. Orthodontics in the general dental service of England and Wales: a critical assessment of standards. Br Dent J 1993;174:315–29. Search in Google Scholar

McGuinness NJ, Stephens CD. An introduction to the indices of malocclusion. Dent Update 1994; 21:140–4. Search in Google Scholar

Richmond S, Shaw WC, O’Brien KD et al. The development of the PAR index: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:125–39. Search in Google Scholar

Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR Index: methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:180–7. Search in Google Scholar

American Board of Orthodontics. ‘The American Board of Orthodontics Examination Information.’ 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: 994:1. Search in Google Scholar

Yang-Powers LC, Sadowsky C, Rosenstein S, BeGole EA. Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:451–5. Search in Google Scholar

Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:589–99. Search in Google Scholar

Tang EL, Wei SH. Recording and measuring malocclusion: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:344–51. Search in Google Scholar

Poulton D, Baumrind S, Vlaskalic V. Treatment outcomes in 3 modes of orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:176–84. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2207-7480
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
Volume Open
Argomenti della rivista:
Medicine, Basic Medical Science, other