Accès libre

Visual application of the American Board of Orthodontics grading system

À propos de cet article

Citez

Tahir E, Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ. An assessment of treatment outcome in American Board of Orthodontics cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:335–42. Search in Google Scholar

Shaw WC, Richmond S, O’Brien KD, Brook P, Stephens CD. Quality control in Orthodontics: indices of treatment need and treatment standards. Brit Dent J 1991;170: 107–12. Search in Google Scholar

Otuyemi OD, Jones SP. Methods of assessing and grading malocclusion: a review. Aust Orthod J 1995;14:21–7. Search in Google Scholar

Lobb WK, Ismail AI, Andrews CL, Spracklin TE. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:70–5. Search in Google Scholar

Daniels CP, Richmond S. International comparisons of professional assessments in orthodontics: Part 2 – treatment outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113: 324–8. Search in Google Scholar

Massler M, Frankel JM. Prevalence of malocclusion in children aged 14 to 18 years. Am J Orthod 1951;37:751–68. Search in Google Scholar

Summers CJ. A system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. The Occlusal Index. Doctoral thesis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan 1996. Search in Google Scholar

Dyken RA, Sadowsky PL, Hurst D. Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the Peer Assessment Rating Index. Angle Orthod 2001;71:164–9. Search in Google Scholar

Hermanson PC, Grewe JM. Examiner variability of several malocclusion indices. Angle Orthod 1970;40:219–25. Search in Google Scholar

Grewe JM, Hagan DV. Malocclusion indices: a comparative evaluation. Am J Orthod 1972;61:286–94. Search in Google Scholar

Pickering EA, Vig P. The occlusal index to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1975; 2:47–51. Search in Google Scholar

Elderton RJ, Clark JD. Orthodontic treatment in the General Dental Services assessed by the Occlusal Index. Br J Orthod 1983;10:178–86. Search in Google Scholar

Eismann D. Reliable assessment of morphological changes resulting from orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1980;2:19–25. Search in Google Scholar

Berg, R. Post-retention analysis of treatment problems and failures in 264 consecutively treated cases. Eur J Orthod 1979;1:55–68. Search in Google Scholar

Hickham J in Gottlieb E. Grading your orthodontic treatment results. J Clin Orthod 1975;9:155–61. Search in Google Scholar

Carlos JP. Evaluation of indices of malocclusion. Int Dent J 1970;20:606–17. Search in Google Scholar

Draker HL. Judgements of peers in assessing the orthodontic handicap. J Public Health Dent 1970;30:134–40. Search in Google Scholar

Willems G, Heidbuchel R, Verdonck A, Carels C. Treatment and standard evaluation using the Peer Assessment Rating Index. Clin Oral Investig 2001; 5:57–62. Search in Google Scholar

Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11: 309–20. Search in Google Scholar

Firestone RA, Hasler RH, Ingervall B. Treatment results in dental school orthodontic patients in 1983 and 1993. Angle Orthod 1999;69:19–26. Search in Google Scholar

Richmond S, Shaw WC, Stephens CD, Webb WG, Roberts CT, Andrews M. Orthodontics in the general dental service of England and Wales: a critical assessment of standards. Br Dent J 1993;174:315–29. Search in Google Scholar

McGuinness NJ, Stephens CD. An introduction to the indices of malocclusion. Dent Update 1994; 21:140–4. Search in Google Scholar

Richmond S, Shaw WC, O’Brien KD et al. The development of the PAR index: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:125–39. Search in Google Scholar

Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR Index: methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:180–7. Search in Google Scholar

American Board of Orthodontics. ‘The American Board of Orthodontics Examination Information.’ 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: 994:1. Search in Google Scholar

Yang-Powers LC, Sadowsky C, Rosenstein S, BeGole EA. Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:451–5. Search in Google Scholar

Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:589–99. Search in Google Scholar

Tang EL, Wei SH. Recording and measuring malocclusion: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:344–51. Search in Google Scholar

Poulton D, Baumrind S, Vlaskalic V. Treatment outcomes in 3 modes of orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:176–84. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2207-7480
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
Volume Open
Sujets de la revue:
Medicine, Basic Medical Science, other