Vertical facial pattern and orthodontic stability Part II: Facial axis changes and stability

1 Nanda RS, Nanda SK. Considerations of dentofacial growth in long-term retention and stability: Is active retention needed? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 297–302 Search in Google Scholar

2 Huggins DG, Birch RH. A cephalometric investigation of stability of upper incisors following their retraction. Am J Orthod 1964; 50: 852–6. Search in Google Scholar

3 Little R, Wallen T, Reidel R. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment in first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional Edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981; 80: 349–65. Search in Google Scholar

4 Richardson ME. Role of the third molar in the cause of late lower arch crowding: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 95: 79–83. Search in Google Scholar

5 Otuyemi OD, Jones SP. Methods of assessing and grading malocclusions. Aust Orthod J 1995; 14: 21–7. Search in Google Scholar

6 Otuyemi OD, Jones SP. Long-term evaluation of treated Class II Division 1 malocclusions utilizing the PAR Index. Brit J Orthod 1995; 22: 171–8. Search in Google Scholar

7 Woods MG, Lee DW, Crawford EC. Finishing occlusion, orthodontic stability and the PAR Index. Aust Orthod J 2000; 16: 9–15. Search in Google Scholar

8 Pinto NJ, Woods MG, Crawford EC. Vertical facial pattern and orthodontic stability. Part 1. Pretreatment vertical pattern and stability. Aust Orthod J 2000; 16: 127–31 Search in Google Scholar

9 Barrow GV, White JR. Developmental changes of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches. Angle Orthod 1952; 22: 41–6. Search in Google Scholar

10 Cryer BS. Lower arch changes during the early teens. A survey of 1000 London school children. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1965; 87–101. Search in Google Scholar

11 Moorrees CFA, Chadha MJ. Available space for the incisors during dental development. Angle Orthod 1965; 35: 12–22. Search in Google Scholar

12 Foster TD, Hamilton MC, Lavelle CLB. A study of dental arch crowding in four age groups. Dent Pract 1970; 21: 9–12. Search in Google Scholar

13 Shapiro P. Mandibular dental arch form and dimension. Am J Orthod 1974; 66: 58–70. Search in Google Scholar

14 Sinclair PM, Little RM. Maturation of untreated normal occlusions. Am J Orthod 1983; 83: 114–23. Search in Google Scholar

15 Little RM, Reidel RA, Artun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years post-retention. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 93: 423–8. Search in Google Scholar

16 Hahn GW. Retention—the stepchild of orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1944; 14: 3–12. Search in Google Scholar

17 Nance HN. The limitations of orthodontic treatment II. Diagnosis and treatment in the permanent dentition. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 1947; 33: 253–301. Search in Google Scholar

18 Strang RHW. Factors associated with successful orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1952; 38: 790–800. Search in Google Scholar

19 Tweed C. The Frankfort-mandibular incisal angle in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954; 24: 121–69. Search in Google Scholar

20 Isaacson RJ, Christiansen RL, Evans CA, Reidel RA. Research on variation in dental occlusion. Am J Orthod 1975; 68: 241–55. Search in Google Scholar

21 Engel GA. Treatment of deep bite cases. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 1–13. Search in Google Scholar

22 Udhe M, Sadowski C, Begole E. Long term stability of dental relations after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1983; 53: 240–56. Search in Google Scholar

23 McReynolds DC, Little RM. Mandibular second pre-molar extraction: post-retention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1991; 62: 133–44. Search in Google Scholar

24 Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston L. A long term comparison of non-extraction and premolar extraction edge-wise therapy in borderline Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 102: 1–14. Search in Google Scholar

25 Lenz GJ, Woods MG. Incisal changes and orthodontic stability. Angle Orthod 1999; 69: 424–31. Search in Google Scholar

26 Moore AW. The observation of facial growth and its significance. Am J Orthod 1959; 45: 399–423. Search in Google Scholar

27 Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 1964; 34: 75–93. Search in Google Scholar

28 Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod 1957; 27: 14–27. Search in Google Scholar

29 Merrifield LL, Cross JJ. Directional forces. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 435–65. Search in Google Scholar

30 Creekmore T. Inhibition or stimulation of vertical growth of the facial complex: its significance to treatment. Angle Orthod 1974; 60: 599–618. Search in Google Scholar

31 Melsen B. Effects of cervical anchorage during and after treatment: an implant study. Am J Orthod 1978; 73: 526–40. Search in Google Scholar

32 Teuscher U. An appraisal of growth and reaction to extraoral anchorage. Simulation of orthodontic and orthopedic results. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1986; 88: 113–21. Search in Google Scholar

33 Bishara SE, Staley RN. Maxillary expansion: clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 91: 3–14. Search in Google Scholar

34 Nemeth RB, Isaacson RJ. Vertical anterior relapse. Am J Orthod 1974; 65: 565–85. Search in Google Scholar

35 Fotis V, Melsen B, Williams S. Post-treatment changes of skeletal morphology following treatment aimed at restriction of maxillary growth. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 288–96. Search in Google Scholar

36 Pancherz H, Fackel U. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1990; 12: 209–18. Search in Google Scholar

37 Burke M, Jakobson A. Vertical changes in high angle Class II Division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital-pull headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 102: 501–8. Search in Google Scholar

38 Fidler BC, Artun J, Joondeph DR, Little RM. Long-term stability of Angle Class II Division I malocclusions with successful occlusal results at the end of active treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 107: 276–85. Search in Google Scholar

39 Hertzberg R. A cephalometric study of Class II relapse. Angle Orthod 1973; 35: 36–50. Search in Google Scholar

40 Siriwat PP, Jarabak JR. Malocclusion and facial morphology: Is there a relationship? Angle Orthod 1985; 55: 127–38. Search in Google Scholar

41 Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971; 60: 111–27. Search in Google Scholar

42 Vincent AM, West VC. Cephalometric landmark identification error. Aust Orthod J 1987; 10: 98–104. Search in Google Scholar

43 Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R, Stephens CD, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 125–39. Search in Google Scholar

44 Shields TE, Little RM, Chapko MK. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: A cephalo-metric appraisal of first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 27–38. Search in Google Scholar

45 Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. Angle Orthod 1981; 51: 115–50. Search in Google Scholar

46 Berg R. Post-retention analysis of treatment problems and failures in 264 consecutively treated cases. Eur J Orthod 1979; 91: 45–68. Search in Google Scholar

47 McDowell EH, Baker IM. The skeletal adaptation in deep bite correction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 100: 370–5. Search in Google Scholar

48 Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Brit J Orthod 1980; 7: 145–61. Search in Google Scholar