This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Nanda RS, Nanda SK. Considerations of dentofacial growth in long-term retention and stability: Is active retention needed? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 297–302Search in Google Scholar
Huggins DG, Birch RH. A cephalometric investigation of stability of upper incisors following their retraction. Am J Orthod 1964; 50: 852–6.Search in Google Scholar
Little R, Wallen T, Reidel R. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment in first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional Edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981; 80: 349–65.Search in Google Scholar
Richardson ME. Role of the third molar in the cause of late lower arch crowding: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 95: 79–83.Search in Google Scholar
Otuyemi OD, Jones SP. Methods of assessing and grading malocclusions. Aust Orthod J 1995; 14: 21–7.Search in Google Scholar
Otuyemi OD, Jones SP. Long-term evaluation of treated Class II Division 1 malocclusions utilizing the PAR Index. Brit J Orthod 1995; 22: 171–8.Search in Google Scholar
Woods MG, Lee DW, Crawford EC. Finishing occlusion, orthodontic stability and the PAR Index. Aust Orthod J 2000; 16: 9–15.Search in Google Scholar
Pinto NJ, Woods MG, Crawford EC. Vertical facial pattern and orthodontic stability. Part 1. Pretreatment vertical pattern and stability. Aust Orthod J 2000; 16: 127–31Search in Google Scholar
Barrow GV, White JR. Developmental changes of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches. Angle Orthod 1952; 22: 41–6.Search in Google Scholar
Cryer BS. Lower arch changes during the early teens. A survey of 1000 London school children. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1965; 87–101.Search in Google Scholar
Moorrees CFA, Chadha MJ. Available space for the incisors during dental development. Angle Orthod 1965; 35: 12–22.Search in Google Scholar
Foster TD, Hamilton MC, Lavelle CLB. A study of dental arch crowding in four age groups. Dent Pract 1970; 21: 9–12.Search in Google Scholar
Shapiro P. Mandibular dental arch form and dimension. Am J Orthod 1974; 66: 58–70.Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair PM, Little RM. Maturation of untreated normal occlusions. Am J Orthod 1983; 83: 114–23.Search in Google Scholar
Little RM, Reidel RA, Artun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years post-retention. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 93: 423–8.Search in Google Scholar
Hahn GW. Retention—the stepchild of orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1944; 14: 3–12.Search in Google Scholar
Nance HN. The limitations of orthodontic treatment II. Diagnosis and treatment in the permanent dentition. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 1947; 33: 253–301.Search in Google Scholar
Strang RHW. Factors associated with successful orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1952; 38: 790–800.Search in Google Scholar
Tweed C. The Frankfort-mandibular incisal angle in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954; 24: 121–69.Search in Google Scholar
Isaacson RJ, Christiansen RL, Evans CA, Reidel RA. Research on variation in dental occlusion. Am J Orthod 1975; 68: 241–55.Search in Google Scholar
Udhe M, Sadowski C, Begole E. Long term stability of dental relations after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1983; 53: 240–56.Search in Google Scholar
McReynolds DC, Little RM. Mandibular second pre-molar extraction: post-retention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1991; 62: 133–44.Search in Google Scholar
Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston L. A long term comparison of non-extraction and premolar extraction edge-wise therapy in borderline Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 102: 1–14.Search in Google Scholar
Lenz GJ, Woods MG. Incisal changes and orthodontic stability. Angle Orthod 1999; 69: 424–31.Search in Google Scholar
Moore AW. The observation of facial growth and its significance. Am J Orthod 1959; 45: 399–423.Search in Google Scholar
Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 1964; 34: 75–93.Search in Google Scholar
Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod 1957; 27: 14–27.Search in Google Scholar
Merrifield LL, Cross JJ. Directional forces. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 435–65.Search in Google Scholar
Creekmore T. Inhibition or stimulation of vertical growth of the facial complex: its significance to treatment. Angle Orthod 1974; 60: 599–618.Search in Google Scholar
Melsen B. Effects of cervical anchorage during and after treatment: an implant study. Am J Orthod 1978; 73: 526–40.Search in Google Scholar
Teuscher U. An appraisal of growth and reaction to extraoral anchorage. Simulation of orthodontic and orthopedic results. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1986; 88: 113–21.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Staley RN. Maxillary expansion: clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 91: 3–14.Search in Google Scholar
Nemeth RB, Isaacson RJ. Vertical anterior relapse. Am J Orthod 1974; 65: 565–85.Search in Google Scholar
Fotis V, Melsen B, Williams S. Post-treatment changes of skeletal morphology following treatment aimed at restriction of maxillary growth. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 288–96.Search in Google Scholar
Pancherz H, Fackel U. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1990; 12: 209–18.Search in Google Scholar
Burke M, Jakobson A. Vertical changes in high angle Class II Division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital-pull headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 102: 501–8.Search in Google Scholar
Fidler BC, Artun J, Joondeph DR, Little RM. Long-term stability of Angle Class II Division I malocclusions with successful occlusal results at the end of active treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 107: 276–85.Search in Google Scholar
Hertzberg R. A cephalometric study of Class II relapse. Angle Orthod 1973; 35: 36–50.Search in Google Scholar
Siriwat PP, Jarabak JR. Malocclusion and facial morphology: Is there a relationship? Angle Orthod 1985; 55: 127–38.Search in Google Scholar
Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971; 60: 111–27.Search in Google Scholar
Vincent AM, West VC. Cephalometric landmark identification error. Aust Orthod J 1987; 10: 98–104.Search in Google Scholar
Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R, Stephens CD, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 125–39.Search in Google Scholar
Shields TE, Little RM, Chapko MK. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: A cephalo-metric appraisal of first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 27–38.Search in Google Scholar
Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. Angle Orthod 1981; 51: 115–50.Search in Google Scholar
Berg R. Post-retention analysis of treatment problems and failures in 264 consecutively treated cases. Eur J Orthod 1979; 91: 45–68.Search in Google Scholar
McDowell EH, Baker IM. The skeletal adaptation in deep bite correction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 100: 370–5.Search in Google Scholar
Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Brit J Orthod 1980; 7: 145–61.Search in Google Scholar