Analysis of the development direction of the history of American war photography in the context of big data

[1] Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. (2021). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bejar, I., Douglas, D., Jamieson, J., et al. (2000). TOEFL 2000 listening framework. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., et al. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans Green. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Brantmeier, C. (2006). Toward a multicomponent model of interest and L2 reading: Sources of interest, perceived situational interest, and comprehension. Reading in a foreign language, 18(2), 89-115. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Curriculum Planning & Development Division. (2010). English language syllabus 2010 primary & secondary (Express/Normal [Academic]). Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bearne, E. (2009). Multimodality, literacy and texts: Developing a discourse. Journal of early childhood literacy, 9(2), 156-187. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Paas, F., Renkl, A., Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1-4. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Glasgow, J. N. (1994). Teaching visual literacy for the 21st century. Journal of reading, 494-500. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Guichon, N., McLornan, S. (2008). The effects of multimodality on L2 learners: Implications for CALL resource design. System, 36(1), 85-93. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ginther, A. (2002). Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli. Language Testing, 19(2), 133-167. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ockey, G. J. (2007). Construct implications of including still image or video in computer-based listening tests. Language Testing, 24(4), 517-537. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Fang, C., Tao, Y., Wang, J., et al. (2021). Research on Leakage Current Waveform Spectrum Characteristics of Artificial Pollution Porcelain Insulator. Frontiers in Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.798048. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kress, G., Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G., Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational technology research and development, 31-43. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Secules, T., Herron, C., Tomasello, M. (1992). The effect of video context on foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 76(4), 480-490. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Sueyoshi, A., Hardison, D. M. (2005). The role of gestures and facial cues in second language listening comprehension. Language learning, 55(4), 661-699. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Serafini, F. (2012). Expanding the four resources model: Reading visual and multi-modal texts. Pedagogies: An international journal, 7(2), 150-164. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Arya, D. J., Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P. D. (2011). The effects of syntactic and lexical complexity on the comprehension of elementary science texts. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 107-125. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Baba, K. (2009). Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language. Journal of second language writing, 18(3), 191-208. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Gamson, D. A., Lu, X., Eckert, S. A. (2013). Challenging the research base of the Common Core State Standards: A historical reanalysis of text complexity. Educational Researcher, 42(7), 381-391. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Harley, B., King, M. L. (1989). Verb lexis in the written compositions of young L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(4), 415-439. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Hiebert, E. H., Mesmer, H. A. E. (2013). Upping the ante of text complexity in the Common Core State Standards: Examining its potential impact on young readers. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 44-51. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Hsueh-Chao, M. H., Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Hyltenstam, K. (1988). Lexical characteristics of near -native second -language learners of Swedish. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 9(1-2), 67-84. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Kliebard, H. M. (2004). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958. Psychology Press. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Kyle, K., Crossley, S. A. (2015). Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. Tesol Quarterly, 49(4), 757-786. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Kyle, K., Crossley, S. (2016). The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 12-24. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied linguistics, 27(4), 590-619. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Laufer, B. (1989). 25 What Percentage of Text-Lexis is Essential for Comprehension?. Special language: From humans thinking to thinking machines, 316. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Fang, C., Tao, Y.,Wang, J., et al. (2021). Mapping Relation of Leakage Currents of Polluted Insulators and Discharge Arc Area. Frontiers in Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.777230. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Laufer, B., Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied linguistics, 16(3), 307-322. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Lu, X. (2012). The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190-208. Search in Google Scholar