This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Bejar, I., et al. (2000). TOEFL 2000 listening framework: A working paper. Educational Testing Service, Princeton: New Jersey, (02), 33-40.Search in Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., et al. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans Green.Search in Google Scholar
Brantmeier, C. (2006). Toward a multicomponent model of interest and L2 reading: Sources of interest, perceived situational interest and comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, (18), 89-115.Search in Google Scholar
Curriculum Planning & Development Division. English Language Syllabus 2010, Primary &Secondary (Express/Normal [Academic]). Singapore: Ministry of Education, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Eve, B. (2009). Multimodality. Literacy and Texts: Developing a Discourse. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, (09), 156-187.Search in Google Scholar
Fred, P., Alexander, R. &. Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Development. Educational Psychology, (1), 1-4.Search in Google Scholar
Glasgow, J. N. (1994). Teaching Visual Literacy for the 21st Century. Journal of Reading, 37(6), 494-500.Search in Google Scholar
Guichon, N. & Mc Lornan S. (2008). The effects of multimodality on L2 learners. Implication for CALL resource design. System, (36), 85-93.Search in Google Scholar
Ginther, A. (2002). Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli. Language Testing, 19(2), 133-167.Search in Google Scholar
Gary, J. (2007). Ockey. Construct implications of including still image or video in computer-based listening tests. Language Testing, (24), 517-537.Search in Google Scholar
Fang Chunhua, Tao Yuning, Wang Jianguo, You Haixin, Cui Yan & Zhou Mi.(2021). Research on Leakage Current Waveform Spectrum Characteristics of Artificial Pollution Porcelain Insulator. Frontiers in Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENRG.2021.798048.Search in Google Scholar
Kress, G. & Van Leeu ween, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, R., Steinhoff, K. & Bower, G., et al. (1995). A Generative Theory of Textbook Design: Using Annotated Illustrations to Foster Meaningful Learning of Science Text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 31-41.Search in Google Scholar
Secules, T. S. C., Herron, Tomasello M. (1992). The effect of video context on foreign language learning. Modern Language Journal, (4), 480-490.Search in Google Scholar
Sueyoshi, A. & Hardison, D. M. (2005). The role of gestures and facial cues in second languagelistening comprehension. Language Learning, 55(4), 661-699.Search in Google Scholar
Serafmi, F. (2012). Expanding the four resources model. Reading visual and multi - modal texts, 7(2), 150-164.Search in Google Scholar
Arya, D. J., Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P. D. (2011). The effects of syntactic and lexical complexity on the comprehension of elementary science texts. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 107-125.Search in Google Scholar
Baba, K. (2009). Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(3), 191-208.Search in Google Scholar
Gamson, D., Lu, X., Eckert, Sarah Anne. (2013). Challenging the research base of the common core state standards: A historical reanalysis of text complexity. Educational Researcher, 42(7), 381-391.Search in Google Scholar
Harley, B., King, M. (1989). Verb lexis in the written compositions of young L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(4), 415-439.Search in Google Scholar
Hiebert, E., Mesmer, H. (2013). Upping the ante of text complexity in the common core state standards examining its potential impact on young readers. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 44-51.Search in Google Scholar
Hsueh-Chao, Marcella, H. & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in A Foreign Language, 13(1).Search in Google Scholar
Kenneth, H. (1998). Lexical characteristics of near-native second-language learners of Swedish. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 9(1-2), 67-84.Search in Google Scholar
Kliebard, H. (1986). The struggle for the American curriculum 1893-1958. European Journal of Education, 35(2), 86.Search in Google Scholar
Kyle, K., Crossley, S. A. (2015). Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. Tesol Quarterly, 49(4), 757–786.Search in Google Scholar
Kyle, K., Crossley, S. (2016). The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 12-24.Search in Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590-619.Search in Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text lexis is necessary for comprehension?. Special Language: from humans thinking to thinking machines. 316-323.Search in Google Scholar
Fang Chunhua, Tao Yuning, Wang Jianguo, Ding Can, Huang Li, Zhou Mi. & Wang Yali. (2021). Mapping Relation of Leakage Currents of Polluted Insulators and Discharge Arc Area. Frontiers in Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENRG.2021.777230.Search in Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322.Search in Google Scholar
Lu, X. (2012). The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208.Search in Google Scholar
Lu, X., Gamson, D. A., Eckert, S. A. (2014). Lexical difficulty and diversity of American elementary school reading textbooks: Changes over the past century. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(10), 738-744.Search in Google Scholar
Malvern, et al. (2004). Lexical Diversity and Language Development. Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. The Companion to Language Assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar