Construction of a text complexity grading model for English textbooks in the context of globalization

[1] Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bejar, I., et al. (2000). TOEFL 2000 listening framework: A working paper. Educational Testing Service, Princeton: New Jersey, (02), 33-40. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., et al. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans Green. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Brantmeier, C. (2006). Toward a multicomponent model of interest and L2 reading: Sources of interest, perceived situational interest and comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, (18), 89-115. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Curriculum Planning & Development Division. English Language Syllabus 2010, Primary &Secondary (Express/Normal [Academic]). Singapore: Ministry of Education, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Eve, B. (2009). Multimodality. Literacy and Texts: Developing a Discourse. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, (09), 156-187. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Fred, P., Alexander, R. &. Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Development. Educational Psychology, (1), 1-4. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Glasgow, J. N. (1994). Teaching Visual Literacy for the 21st Century. Journal of Reading, 37(6), 494-500. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Guichon, N. & Mc Lornan S. (2008). The effects of multimodality on L2 learners. Implication for CALL resource design. System, (36), 85-93. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ginther, A. (2002). Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli. Language Testing, 19(2), 133-167. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Gary, J. (2007). Ockey. Construct implications of including still image or video in computer－based listening tests. Language Testing, (24), 517-537. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Fang Chunhua, Tao Yuning, Wang Jianguo, You Haixin, Cui Yan & Zhou Mi.(2021). Research on Leakage Current Waveform Spectrum Characteristics of Artificial Pollution Porcelain Insulator. Frontiers in Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENRG.2021.798048. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kress, G. & Van Leeu ween, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Mayer, R., Steinhoff, K. & Bower, G., et al. (1995). A Generative Theory of Textbook Design: Using Annotated Illustrations to Foster Meaningful Learning of Science Text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 31-41. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Secules, T. S. C., Herron, Tomasello M. (1992). The effect of video context on foreign language learning. Modern Language Journal, (4), 480-490. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Sueyoshi, A. & Hardison, D. M. (2005). The role of gestures and facial cues in second languagelistening comprehension. Language Learning, 55(4), 661-699. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Serafmi, F. (2012). Expanding the four resources model. Reading visual and multi - modal texts, 7(2), 150-164. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Arya, D. J., Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P. D. (2011). The effects of syntactic and lexical complexity on the comprehension of elementary science texts. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 107-125. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Baba, K. (2009). Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(3), 191-208. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Gamson, D., Lu, X., Eckert, Sarah Anne. (2013). Challenging the research base of the common core state standards: A historical reanalysis of text complexity. Educational Researcher, 42(7), 381-391. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Harley, B., King, M. (1989). Verb lexis in the written compositions of young L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(4), 415-439. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Hiebert, E., Mesmer, H. (2013). Upping the ante of text complexity in the common core state standards examining its potential impact on young readers. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 44-51. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Hsueh-Chao, Marcella, H. & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in A Foreign Language, 13(1). Search in Google Scholar

[25] Kenneth, H. (1998). Lexical characteristics of near-native second-language learners of Swedish. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 9(1-2), 67-84. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Kliebard, H. (1986). The struggle for the American curriculum 1893-1958. European Journal of Education, 35(2), 86. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Kyle, K., Crossley, S. A. (2015). Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. Tesol Quarterly, 49(4), 757–786. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Kyle, K., Crossley, S. (2016). The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 12-24. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590-619. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text lexis is necessary for comprehension?. Special Language: from humans thinking to thinking machines. 316-323. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Fang Chunhua, Tao Yuning, Wang Jianguo, Ding Can, Huang Li, Zhou Mi. & Wang Yali. (2021). Mapping Relation of Leakage Currents of Polluted Insulators and Discharge Arc Area. Frontiers in Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENRG.2021.777230. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Lu, X. (2012). The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Lu, X., Gamson, D. A., Eckert, S. A. (2014). Lexical difficulty and diversity of American elementary school reading textbooks: Changes over the past century. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(10), 738-744. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Malvern, et al. (2004). Lexical Diversity and Language Development. Palgrave Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. The Companion to Language Assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Search in Google Scholar