Sensitivity Analysis of the Waterproof Performance of Elastic Rubber Gasket in Shield Tunnel

[1] Shalabi, F.I., Cording, E.J., Paul, S.L., 2016. Sealant behavior of gasketed segmental tunnel lining-Conceptual model. Geomechanics and Tunnelling. 9(4), 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.201500030 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Shalabi, F.I., Cording, E.J., Paul, S.L., 2012. Concrete segment tunnel lining sealant performance under earthquake loading. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 31(9), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.04.006 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Shi, C.H., Cao, C.Y., Lei, M.F., Peng, L.M., Shen, J.J., 2015. Time-dependent performance and constitutive model of EPDM rubber gasket used for tunnel segment joints. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 50(8), 490-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.09.004 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Gong, C.J., Ding, W.Q., Jin, Y.L., Guo, X.H., Tuo, Y.F., 2015. Waterproofing performance of shield-driven tunnel’s segment joint under ultrahigh water pressure. Tunneling and Underground Construction. 42(1), 410-418. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413449.040 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Xiang, K., Shi, X.W., 2008. Design and optimization of elastic gasket section of shield tunnel lining. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering. 4(2), 361-364. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:BASE.0.2008-02-031 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Novak, G., Sadowski, M., Hu, Z.Q., 1995. A probabilistic gasket design method. SAE Transactions. 1467-1474. https://doi.org/10.4271/950765 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jones, P.A., 1995. Gasket design the way forward. SAE Technical Paper. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Krishnan, M.R., Sural, V., Doshi, V., 1994. Design optimization of automotive powertrain gaskets and seals using cae techniques. SAE Transactions. 245-251. https://doi.org/10.4271/940288 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Peng, X.Q., Liu, G., Wu, L.Y., Liu, G.R., Lam, K.Y., 1998. A stochastic finite element method for fatigue reliability analysis of gear teeth subjected to bending. Computational Mechanics. 21(3), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004660050300 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Shinozuka, M., Wen, Y.K., 1972. Monte Carlo solution of nonlinear vibrations. AIAA Journal. 10(1), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.50064 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Mckay, M.D., Conover, R.J.B.J., 1979. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics. 21(2), 239-245. https://doi.org/10.2307/1271432 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Shields, M.D., Zhang, J., 2016. The generalization of Latin hypercube sampling. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 148(8), 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.002 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Pereira, C.E.L., Bittencourt, M.L., 2010. Topological sensitivity analysis for a two-parameter Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic constitutive model. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures. 7(4), 391-411. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-78252010000400002 Search in Google Scholar

[14] GB 18173.4-2010., 2010. Polymer water-proof materials part 4: Rubber gasket for shield-driven tunnel. Standards Press of China, Beijing. Search in Google Scholar

[15] ISO 3302-1:2014(E)., 2014. Rubber-Tolerances for products-Part 1: Dimensional tolerances. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Emanuele, B., Elmar, P., 2016. Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances. European Journal of Operational Research 248(3), 869-887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.032 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Gan, Y.J., Duan, Q.Y., Gong, W., Tong, C., Sun, Y.W., Chu, W., Ye, A.Z., Miao, C.Y., Di, Z.H., 2014. A comprehensive evaluation of various sensitivity analysis methods: A case study with a hydrological model. Environmental Modelling and Software 51, 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.031 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Hornberger, G.M., Spear, R.C., 1981. An approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems. Journal of Environmental Management. 12 (1), 7-18. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Abdelal, G.F., Cooper, J.E., Robotham, A.J., 2013. Reliability assessment of 3D space frame structures applying stochastic finite element analysis. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design. 9(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-011-9168-0 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Jung, D., Gea, H.C., 2004. Compliant mechanism design with non-linear materials using topology optimization. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design. 1(2), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-004-1494-z Search in Google Scholar

[21] Yue, S., Pilon, P., Cavadias, G., 2002. Power of the Mann-Kendall and Spearman’s rho tests for detecting monotonic trends in hydrological series. Journal of Hydrology. 259(1-4), 254-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00594-7 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Xu, W., Hou, Y., Hung, Y.S., Zou, Y.X., 2013. A comparative analysis of Spearman’s rho and Kendall’s tau in normal and contaminated normal models. Signal Processing. 93(1), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.08.005 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Lei, Z.Y., Wang, Z.Q., 2020. Analysis of stress relaxation characteristics of rubber sealing gaskets under the influence of random parameters. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology- Transactions of Mechanical Engineering. 2, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40997-020-00353-w Search in Google Scholar