Using Computer Technique for Developing Method for Vibration Damage Estimation Under Combined Random and Deterministic Loading

1 Bendat J. Probability functions for random responses. NASA report contract NAS-5-4590, 1964. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19640008076 Search in Google Scholar

2 Bendat J. Random data: Analysis and measurement procedures. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York United States 2010 Search in Google Scholar

3 Bendat J. Principles and Applications of Random Noise Theory. John Wiley, New York,1958 Search in Google Scholar

4 Rice S. Mathematical analysis of random noise. Selected papers on noise and stochastic processes, Dover, New York, 1954 Search in Google Scholar

5 Dirlik T. Application of computers to fatigue analysis, PhD Thesis, Warwick University, 1985. Available from: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/2949/ Search in Google Scholar

6 CAEfatigue VIBRATION (CFV) User Guide & Verification Manual (Release 2020). CAEfatigue Limited, UK, Nov 2020. Search in Google Scholar

7 nCode 2022.0 documentation, HBK 2022. Search in Google Scholar

8 Lalanne C. Mechanical vibration and shock, Vol. 4, Hermes Penton Science, London, 2009 Search in Google Scholar

9 Lalanne C. Mechanical vibration and shock analysis: Specification Development, 3rd edition, Vol. 5, Wiley, London, 2014 Search in Google Scholar

10 Lalanne C. Mechanical vibration and shock analysis: Fatigue Damage, 3rd edition, Vol. 4, Wiley, London, 2014 Search in Google Scholar

11 Steinberg D. Vibration analysis for electronic equipment (2nd edition). Jon Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988 Search in Google Scholar

12 Halfpenny A, Kichim F. Rainflow cycle counting and acoustic fatigue analysis technique for random loading. 10th International Conference RASD, Southampton UK, 2010. Available from: Search in Google Scholar

13 http://www.vibrationdata.com/tutorials2/Paper_RASD2010_005_Halfpenny_Kihm.pdf Search in Google Scholar

14 Halfpenny A. Rainflow Cycle Counting and Fatigue Analysis from PSD, Proceedings of the ASTELAB conference, France, 2007. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42735102.pdf Search in Google Scholar

15 Halfpenny A, Bishop N. Vibration Fatigue, HBM-nCode, UK, 1997 Search in Google Scholar

16 Sweitzer K., Bishop N, Genberg V. Efficient computation of spectral moments for determination of random response statistics. International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering - ISMA, Leuven, BE, 2004. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/docment?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=dd17f690eeac37cf88649cdf823507ca0ffd1f1c Search in Google Scholar

17 Bishop N, Sherratt F. Finite Element Based Fatigue Calculation. NAFEMS Ltd., 2000, https://doi.org/10.59972/ta5h05jd Search in Google Scholar

18 Bishop N. Methods for the rapid evaluation of fatigue damage on the Howden HWP330 wind turbine. Proceedings of 13th British Wind Energy Conference, Swansea, UK, p. 317-321, 1991 Search in Google Scholar

19 Bishop N, Sweitzer K, Schlesinger D, Woodward A. Fatigue calculation for multi input random and deterministic loads in the frequency domain. UK NAFEMS Conference, Oxford IK, Accelerating the Future of CAE, 10-11 June 2014. Search in Google Scholar

20 Bishop N, Kerr S, Murthy P, Sweitzer K. Advances Relating to Fatigue Calculations for Combined Random and Deterministic Loads. SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0725, 2014 https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0725 Search in Google Scholar

21 Bishop N, Murthy P, Sweitzer K. Advances Relating to Fatigue Calculation for Combined Random and Deterministic Loads. 13th International ASTM/ESIS Symposium on Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics (39th National Symposium on Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics), November 13-15, 2013, Jacksonville, FL https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0725 Search in Google Scholar

22 Bishop N, Murthy P, Sweitzer K., Kerr S. Time vs frequency domain analysis for large automotive systems. SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0535, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-0535 Search in Google Scholar

23 Bishop N, Murthy P, Sweitzer K., Kerr S. Time vs frequency domain analysis for large automotive systems. SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0535, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-0535 Search in Google Scholar

24 Ferreira W, Meehan T, Cardoso V, Bishop N. A comparative study of automotive system fatigue models processed in the time and frequency domain. SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0377, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0377 Search in Google Scholar

25 Datta S, Bishop N, Sweitzer K, Atkins A. Simultaneous durability assessment and relative random analysis under base shake loading conditions. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0339, 2017 Search in Google Scholar

26 https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0339 Search in Google Scholar

27 MIL-STD-810H, Department of Defence Test Method Standard: Environmental Engineering Consideration and Laboratory Test, USA, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

28 Brown AM, McGhee DS. Statistical Evaluation and Improvement of Method for Combining Random and Harmonic Loads. Marshall Space Flight Centre, Alabama 35812, 2003. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20030017832 Search in Google Scholar

29 Ptak M, Czmochowski J. Using computer techniques for vibration damage estimation under stochastic loading using the Monte Carlo Method for aerospace applications. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. 2023, vol. 72, p. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2023.103452 Search in Google Scholar

30 Ptak M, Czmochowski J. Using computer techniques for vibration damage estimation of aircraft structures under stochastic loading. W: Computer Aided Engineering. Nauka i przemysł / red. Tadeusz Smolnicki. Wrocław : Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, 2022. p. 169-179. ISBN: 978-83-7493-223-3 Search in Google Scholar

31 Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization (MMPDS-15), Battelle Memorial Institute, July 2020. Search in Google Scholar

32 Delprete C, Sesana R, Vercelli A. Multiaxial damage assessment and life estimation: application to an automotive exhaust manifold. Procedia Engineering Vol. 2, April 2010, p. 725-734. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.078 Search in Google Scholar

33 Engin Z., Coker D. Comparison of Equivalent Stress Method with Critical Plane Approaches for Multiaxial High Cycle Fatigue Assessment. 2nd International Conference on Structural Integrity, ICSI 2017, 4-7 September 2017, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal. Procedia Structural Integrity Vol. 5 2017, p. 1229-1236. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.049 Search in Google Scholar

34 Smolnicki M, Ptak M, Lesiuk G. Static failure load predictions in notched steel components using a combined experimental-numerical approach. International Journal of Structural Integrity. 2017, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 683-693. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-05-2017-0032 Search in Google Scholar

35 Wang JT. Relating Cohesive Zone Models to Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics. NASA/TM-2010-216692, May 2010. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20100021117/downloads/20100021117.pdf Search in Google Scholar

36 Kucharski P, Lesiuk G, Czapliński T, Fratczak R, Maciejewski Ł. Numerical Estimation of Stress Intensity Factors and Crack Propagation in Lug Connector with Existing Flaw. AIP Conference Proceedings. Fatigue Failure and Fracture Mechanics XXVI: Proceedings of the XXVI Polish National Conference on Fatigue Failure and Fracture Mechanics 17-20 May 2016 Fojutowo, Poland. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4965949 Search in Google Scholar

37 Miner A. Cumulative damage in fatigue. J Applied Mechanics, Vol. 67, 1945, pp A159-A164, 1945. Search in Google Scholar

38 Palmgren A. Die lebensdauer von kugellagern, zeitschrift des vereinesdeutscher ingenierure, Vol. 68, No. 14, 1924, pp. 339-341, 1924 Search in Google Scholar

39 Zienkiewicz O.C. Finite Element Method. McGraw-Hill, Dallas (1977) Search in Google Scholar

40 ABAQUS User Manual V2018. Dassault Systems (2017) Search in Google Scholar

41 Ptak M, Czmochowski J. Analysis of the impact of dynamic loads on transmission shafts of a civil aircraft. Modelling in engineering 2020: applied mechanics, Springer 2021. p. 245-257. Available from: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-68455-6_22 Search in Google Scholar

42 Newland D. An introduction to random vibrations, spectral & wavelet analysis. Longman Inc., England 1995 Search in Google Scholar

43 Langtangen H. Python Scripting for Computational Science, Third Edition, Simula Research Laboratory. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009 Search in Google Scholar

44 Python 3.8.12 Documentation (https://docs.python.org/3.8/) Search in Google Scholar

45 Python 2.7.3 Documentation (https://docs.python.org/release/2.7.3/) Search in Google Scholar

46 ESDU 06010 Cycle counting methods for the estimation on fatigue life Search in Google Scholar

47 Matsuishi M, Endo T. Fatigue of metals subject to varying stress. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fukuoka, March 1968 Search in Google Scholar

48 Downing S, Socie D. Simple Rainflow counting algorithms. International Journal of Fatigue, January 1982 Search in Google Scholar

49 Watson P, Dabell B. Cycle counting and fatigue damage. Society of Environmental Engineers, September 1976 Search in Google Scholar

50 Dowling NE.. Local Strain Approach to Fatigue. Comprehensive Structural Integrity, Vol 4, 2003 p. 77-94. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309717379_Comprehensive_Structural_Integrity Search in Google Scholar

51 Meggiolaro MA, Castro JTP. Statistical evaluation of strain-life fatigue crack initiation predictions. International Journal of Fatigue, Vol 26, Issue 5, May 2004, p. 463-476. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.003 Search in Google Scholar

52 Lee YL, Hathaway R, Barkey M. Fatigue Testing and Analysis. Theory and Practice. Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, 1st Edition July 29, 2004. Search in Google Scholar