Trajectory Planning For Tractor Turning Using The Trigonometric Transition Curve

1Backman, J., Oksanen, T., Visala, A. (2012). Path generation method with steering rate constraint. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.Search in Google Scholar

2Backman, J., Piirainen, P., Oksanen, T. (2015). Smooth turning path generation for agricultural vehicles in headlands. Biosyst. Eng., 139, 76-86.Search in Google Scholar

3Bochtis, D.D. &Vougioukas, S.G. (2008). Minimising the non-working distance travelled by machines operating in a headland field pattern. Biosyst. Eng., 101, 1-12.Search in Google Scholar

4Boryga, M., Kołodziej, P., Gołacki, K. (2017). Clothoid as a transition curve of the manipulator end – effector trajectory for harvesting tomatoes in a greenhouse. IX International Scientific Symposium „Farm Machinery and Porcesses Management in Sustainable Agriculture”, Lublin, Poland, 52-57.Search in Google Scholar

5Boryga, M., Gołacki, K., Kołodziej, P (2019). The use of polynomial transition curves for trajectory of motion planning. X International Scientific Symposium „Farm Machinery and Porcesses Management in Sustainable Agriculture”, Lublin, Poland, 91-95.Search in Google Scholar

6Boryga, M., Kołodziej, P., Gołacki, K. (2020). Application of polynomial transition curves for trajectory planning on the headlands. Agriculture, 10(5), 144.Search in Google Scholar

7Bulgakov, V., Pascuzzi, S., Beloev, H., & Ivanovs, S. (2019). Theoretical investigations of the headland turning agility of a trailed asymmetric implement-and-tractor aggregate. Agriculture, 9, 224.Search in Google Scholar

8Cariou, C., Lenain, R., Thuilot, B., Humbert, T., Berducat, M. (2010). Maneuvers automation for agricultural vehicle in headland. AgEng International Conference on Agricultural Engineering. Cler-mont-Ferrand, France, hal-00523407,10p.Search in Google Scholar

9Cariou, C., Gabor, Z., Seiferth, B., &Berducat, M. (2016). Mobile robot trajectory planning under kinematic and dynamic constraints for partial and full field coverage. Journal of Field Robotics, 34, 1297-1312.Search in Google Scholar

10Koc, W. (2014). Analytical method of modelling the geometric system of communication route. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article ID 679817.Search in Google Scholar

11Oksanen, T., &Visala, A. (2004). Optimal control of traktor-trailer system in headlands. ASAE International Conference of Automation Technology for Off-Road Equipment, Kyoto, Japan, 255-263. Search in Google Scholar

12Oksanen, T. (2007). Path planning algorithms for agricultural field machines. Series A: Research Reports No. 31. Helsinki University of Technology, Automation Technology Laboratory. Search in Google Scholar

13Sabelhaus, D., Röben, F., Helligen, L.P.M.Z., &Lammers, P.S. (2013). Using continuous-curvature paths to generate feasible headland turn manoeuvres. Biosystems Engineering, 116(4), 399-409. Search in Google Scholar

14Sabelhaus, D., Lammers, P.S., Peter L., &Röben. F. (2015). Path planning of headland turn manoeuvres. Landtechnik,70(4), 123-131. Search in Google Scholar

15Wang, H., &Noguchi, N. (2018). Adaptive turning control for an agricultural robot tractor. International Journal of Agricultural&Biological Engineering, 11(6), 113-119. Search in Google Scholar

16Tu, X., Tang, L. (2019). Headland turning optimisation for agricultural vehicles and those with towed implements. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 1, 100009. Search in Google Scholar