[ADAMS, J.M. – FAURE, H. – FAURE-DENARD, L. – MCGLAVE, J.M. – WOODWARD, F.I. 1990. Increases in terrestrial carbon storage from the last glacial maximum to the present. In Nature, vol. 348, pp. 711 – 714.]Search in Google Scholar
[BLAIR, J. – NIPPERT, J. – BRIGGS, J. 2014. Grassland ecology. In MONSON, R.K. (Ed.) Ecology and the Environmental. The Plant Science 8. New York : Springer Science, pp. 389 – 424. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7501-9_1410.1007/978-1-4614-7501-9_14]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[BRYAN, W.B. 1985. Effects of sod-seeding legumes on hill land pasture productivity and composition. In Agronomy Journal, vol. 77, pp. 901 – 905.]Search in Google Scholar
[CATOVSKY, S. – BRADFORD, M.A. – HECTOR, A. 2002. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity: implications for carbon storage. In Oikos, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 443 – 448.]Search in Google Scholar
[CORAZZIN, M. – ROMANZIN, A. – SEPULCRI, A. – PINOSA, M. – PIASENTIER, E. – BOVOLENTA, S. 2019. Fatty acid profiles of cow’s milk and cheese as affected by mountain pasture type and concentrate supplementation. In Animals (Basel), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 68. DOI: 10.3390/ani902006810.3390/ani9020068]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[DENGLER, J. ‒ JANIŠOVÁ, M. – TÖRÖK, P. – WELLSTEIN, C. 2014. Biodiversity of Palaearctic grasslands: a synthesis. In Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 182, pp. 1 – 14. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.12.01510.1016/j.agee.2013.12.015]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[FAOSTAT 2011. http://faostat.fao.org/. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.]Search in Google Scholar
[FRANK, D.A. ‒ KUNS, M.M. – GUIDO, D.R. 2002. Consumer control of grassland plant production. In Ecology, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 602 – 606. DOI: 10.1890/001210.1890/0012]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[FIALA, K. – TŮMA, I. – HOLUB, P. 2014. Proportions of root production in several temperate grasslands of Central Europe. In Ekológia (Bratislava), vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 232 – 241. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2014-002210.2478/eko-2014-0022]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[GARCIA-PAUSAS, J. – CASALS, P. – ROMANYÀ, J. – VALLECILLO, S. – SEBASTIÀ, M.T. 2011. Seasonal patterns of belowground biomass and productivity in mountain grasslands in the Pyrenees. In Plant and Soil, vol. 340, pp. 315 – 326. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0601-1 HRIVŇÁKOVÁ, K. et al. 2011. Jednotné pracovné postupy rozborov pôd [Uniform working methods for soil analysis]. Bratislava: SSCRI, 145 pp. ISBN 978-80-89128-89-110.1007/s11104-010-0601-1HRIVŇÁKOVÁ.etal.2011.Jednotnépracovnépostupyrozborovpôd[].Bratislava:SSCRI,145pp.ISBN978-80-89128-89-1]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[HEJCMAN, M. – HEJCMANOVA, P. – PAVLŮ, V. – BENEŠ, J. 2013. Origin and history of grasslands in Central Europe – a review. In Grass and Forage Science, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 345 – 364. DOI: 10.1111/gfs.1206610.1111/gfs.12066]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[HOFMANN, M. – ISSELSTEIN, J. 2005. Species enrichment in an agriculturally improved grassland and its effects on botanical composition, yield and forage quality. In Grass and Forage Science, vol. 60, pp. 136 – 145. DOI: / 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2005.00460.x10.1111/j.1365-2494.2005.00460.x]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[HOPKINS, A. 2004. Relevance and functionality of semi-natural grassland in Europe – status quo and future prospective. In International Workshop of the SALVERE Project, p. 9 – 14.]Search in Google Scholar
[HUNGATE, B.A. – BARBIER, E.B. – ANDO, A.W. – MARKS, S.P. – REICH, P.B. – VAN GESTEL, N. – TILMAN, D. – KNOPS, J.M.H. – HOOPER, D.U. – BUTTERFIELD, B.J. – CARDINAL, B.J. 2017. The economic value of grassland species for carbon storage. In Science Advances, vol. 3, no. 4, e1601880. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.160188010.1126/sciadv.1601880538195828435876]Search in Google Scholar
[HUI, D. – JACKSON, R.B. 2006. Geographical and interannual variability in biomass partitioning in grassland ecosystems: a synthesis of field data. In New Phytologist, vol. 169, pp. 85 – 93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01569.x10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01569.x16390421]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[HUYGHE, C. – DE VLIEGHER, A. – VAN GILS, B. – PEETERS, A. 2014. Grasslands and herbivore production in Europe and effects of common policies. Versailles: Editions Quae, 287 pp. ISBN 978-2-7592-2156-110.35690/978-2-7592-2157-8]Search in Google Scholar
[JANČOVIČ, J. – SLAMKA, P. – VORÁR, Ľ. – KOVÁČIK, P. 2002. Changes of root system of various types of grasslands influenced by mineral nutrition. In Ekológia (Bratislava), vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 356 – 362.]Search in Google Scholar
[JAUREMA, M.A. – LEZEMA, F. – SALVO, L. – CARDOZO, G.A. – AYALA, W. – TERRA, J. – NABINGER, C. 2016. The dilemma of improving native grasslands by overseeding legumes: Production intensification on diversity conservation. In Rangeland Ecology and Management, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 35 – 42.]Search in Google Scholar
[JONES, M.B. – DONNELLY, A. 2004. Carbon sequestration in temperate grassland ecosystem and the influence of managing, climate and elevated CO2. In New Phytologist, vol. 164, no. 3, p. 423 – 439. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01201.x10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01201.x]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[KELL, D.B. 2012. Large-scale sequestration of atmospheric carbon via plant roots in natural and agricultural ecosystems: why and how. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 367, pp. 1589 – 1597. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.024410.1098/rstb.2011.0244332169422527402]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[KIZEKOVA, M. – FEOLI, E. – PARENTE, G. – KANIANSKA, R. 2017. Analysis of the effects of mineral fertilisation on species diversity and yield of permanent grasslands: Revisited data to mediate economic and environmental needs. In Community Ecology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 295 – 304. DOI: 10.1556/168.2017.18.3.810.1556/168.2017.18.3.8]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[KUTSCHERA, L. 1960. Wurzelatlas, mitteleuropaeischer Ackerunkrauter und Kulturpplanzen. DLG-VERLAGS-GMBH. Frankfurt am Main, 374 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[LAL, R. – REICOSKY, D.L. – HANSON, J.D. 2007. Evolution of the plow over 10,000 years and the rationale for no-till farming. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 1 – 12. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2006.11.00410.1016/j.still.2006.11.004]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[LOGES, R. – BUNNE, I. – REINSCH, T. – MALISCH, C. – KLUSS, C. – HERMANN, A. – TAUBE, F. 2018. Forage production in rotational systems generates similar yields compares to maize monocultures but improves soil carbon stock. In Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 97, pp. 11 – 19. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.04.01010.1016/j.eja.2018.04.010]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[LÓPEZ-MÁRSICO, L. – ALTESOR, A. – OYARZABAL, M. – BALDASSINI, P. – PARUELO, J.M. 2015. Grazing increases below-ground biomass and net primary production in a temperate grassland. In Plant and Soil, vol. 392, no. 1 – 2, pp. 155 – 162. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2452-210.1007/s11104-015-2452-2]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MAŠKOVÁ, Z. – DOLEŽAL, J. – KVĚT, J. – ZEMEK, F. 2009. Long-term functioning of a species-rich mountain meadow under different management regimes. In Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 132, pp. 192 – 202. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.00210.1016/j.agee.2009.04.002]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MEA, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington DC: Island Press, 155 pp. ISBN 1-59726-040-1]Search in Google Scholar
[METERA, E. – SAKOWSKIN, T. – SŁONIEWSKI, K. – ROMANOWICZ, B. 2010. Grazing as a toll to maintain biodiversity of grassland – a review. In Animal Science Papers and Reports, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 315 – 334.]Search in Google Scholar
[MICHAUD, A. – ANDUEZA, D. – PICARD, F. – PLANTUREUX, S. – BAUMONT, R. 2011. Seasonal dynamics of biomass production and herbage quality of three grasslands with contrasting functional compositions. In Grass and Forage Science, vol. 67, pp. 64 – 76. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00821.x10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00821.x]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the Slovak Republic (MARD SR), 2018. Report on Agriculture and Food Sector in the Slovak Republic 2017 (Green Report), 76 p. ISBN 978-80-8058-626-3]Search in Google Scholar
[JANOWIAK, M. – CONNELLY, W.J. – DANTE-WOOD, K. – DOMKE, G.M. – GIARDINA, C. – KAYLER, Z. – MARCINKOOWSKI, K. – ONTL, T. – RODRIGUEZ-FRANCO, C. – SWANSTON, C. – WOODALL, C.W. – BUFORD, M. 2017. Considering forest and grassland carbon in land management. Technical Report WO-95. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p.10.2737/WO-GTR-95]Search in Google Scholar
[PAVLŮ, V. – GAISLER, J. – PAVLŮ, L. – HEJCMAN, M. – LUDVIKOVÁ, V. 2012. Effect of fertilizer application and abandonment on plant species composition of Festuca rubra grassland. In Acta Oecologica, vol. 45, pp. 42 – 49. DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2012.08.00710.1016/j.actao.2012.08.007]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[PAVLŮ, L. – PAVLŮ, V. – GAISLER, J. – HEJCMAN, M. 2013. Relationship between soil and biomass chemical properties, herbage yield and sward height in cut and unmanaged mountain hay meadow (Polygono-Trisetion). In Flora, vol. 208, pp. 599 – 608. DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2013.09.00310.1016/j.flora.2013.09.003]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[PAVLŮ, L. – GAISLER, J. – HEJCMAN, M. – PAVLŮ, V. 2016. What is the effect of long-term mulching and traditional cutting regimes on soil and biomass chemical properties, species richness and herbage production in Dactylis glomerata grassland? In Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 217, pp. 13 – 21. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.02610.1016/j.agee.2015.10.026]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[POSCHLOD, P. – WALLIS DE VRIES, M.F. 2002. The historical and socioeconomic perspective of calcareous grasslands: lessons from distant and recent past. In Biological Conservation, vol. 104, no. 3, p. 361 – 376. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00201-410.1016/S0006-3207(01)00201-4]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[PLANTEREUX, S. – PEETERS, A. – MCKRACKEN, D. 2005. Biodiversity in intensive grassland: Effect of management, improvement and challenges. In Agronomy Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 153 – 164.]Search in Google Scholar
[ROOK. A.J. – DUMONT, B. – ISSELSTEIN, J. – OSORO, K. – WALLIS DE WRIES, M.F. – PARENTE, G. – MILLS, J. 2004. Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures: a review. In Biological Conservation, vol. 119, pp. 137 – 150. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.01010.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.010]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[RUDA, P. – SALIS, M. – CARRONI, A.M. 2011. Effectiveness of the GAEC cross compliance standard protection of permanent pasture into arable crops in avoiding habitat deterioration. In Italian Journal of Agronomy, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 87 – 91. DOI: 10.4081/ija.2011.6. s1.e1210.4081/ija.2011.6.s1.e12]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[SAMUIL, C. – VINTU, V. – SIRBU, C. – STAVANCHE, M. 2013. Influence of fertilizers on the biodiversity of seminatural grasslands in the Eastern Carpathins. In Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, vol. 41, pp. 195 – 200. DOI: 10.15835/nbha411836310.15835/nbha4118363]Search in Google Scholar
[SARNO, R. – TALAMUCCI, P – CAVALLERO, A. – STRINGI, L. 1989. Distribuzione della produzione ei pascoli in ambienti marginali italiani. Guida alla valutazione della produttivita. Palermo: Progetto finalizzato CNR-IPRA Aree marginali, pp. 175.]Search in Google Scholar
[SARZEAUD, P. – PFLIMLIN, A. – PERROT, C. – BECHEREL, F. 2008. Diversity of beef farming systems and grassland use in Europe. In Grassland Science in Europe, vol. 13, pp. 693 – 705.]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHLÄPFER, B. – RYSER, P. 1996. Leaf and root turnover of three ecologically contrasting grass species in relation to their performance along a productivity gradient. In Oikos, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 398 – 406.10.2307/3545880]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHLESINGER, W.H. 1991. Biochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change. San Diego: Academic press, 432 pp. ISBN 978-0-12-625157-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic (SO SR), 2019. Available at: http://www.slovakstatistics.sk.]Search in Google Scholar
[TALLOWIN, J.R.B. – JEFFERSON, R.G. 1999. Hay production from lowland semi-natural grasslands: a review of implications for ruminant livestock systems. In Grass and Forage Science, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 99 – 115. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2494.1999.00171.x10.1046/j.1365-2494.1999.00171.x]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[TOBIÁŠOVÁ, E. – ŠIMANSKY, V. – DĘBSKA, B. – BANACH-SZOTT, M. 2013. Soil structure and soil organic matter of selected soil types in different ecosystems. In Agriculture (Poľnohospodárstvo), vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 1 – 8. DOI: 10.2478/agri-2013-000110.2478/agri-2013-0001]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[TOMAŠKIN, J. – JANČOVIČ, J. – VOZÁR, Ľ. – TOMAŠKINOVÁ, J. 2013. The effect of mineral fertilization on belowground plant biomass of grassland ecosystems. In Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1461 – 1440. DOI: 10.11118/actaun20136105143110.11118/actaun201361051431]Search in Google Scholar
[WILLEMS, J.H. – VAN NIEUWSTADT, M.G.L. 1996. Long-term effects of fertilization on above-ground phytomass and species diversity in calcareous grassland. In Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 7, pp. 177 – 184. DOI: 10.2307/323631710.2307/3236317]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar