[
Anderson, D. & Clark, M. (2012). Development of syntactic subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for science by a generalist elementary teacher. Teachers and Teaching, 18(3), 315–330.https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.629838
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Asselborn, W., Jäckel, M. & Risch, K. T. (Eds.) (2009). Chemie heute Klasse 9/10 –Brandenburg. Westermann Schroedel Diesterweg Schönigh Winklers GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H. & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education 39(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M.& Tsai, Y. (2010). Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge. Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G. & Lehmann, R. (Eds.) (2010). TEDS-M 2008 – Professionelle Kompetenz und Lerngelegenheiten angehender Mathematiklehrkräfte für die Sekundarstufe I im internationalen Vergleich [TEDS-M 2008. Professional knowledge and learning opportunities for future mathematics teachers for lower secondary school in an international comparison]. Waxmann, Münster, Germany.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blömeke, S., Bremerich-Vos, A., Haudeck, H., Kaiser, G., Nold, G., Schwippert, K. & Willenberg, H. (Eds.) (2011). Kompetenzen von Lehramtsstudierenden in gering strukturierten Domänen [Competences of teacher students in low-structured domains] Waxmann, Münster, Germany.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolte, C. (2002). Die curriculare Delphi-Studie Chemie: Allgemeinbildung und Chemieunterricht [the curricular Delphi study chemistry: general education and chemistry education], CHEMKON, 9(2), 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3730(200205)9:2<86::AID-CKON86>3.0.CO;2-510.1002/1521-3730(200205)9:2<86::AID-CKON86>3.0.CO;2-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolte, C. (2003a). Konturen wünschenswerter chemiebezogener Bildung im Meinungsbild einer ausgewählten Öffentlichkeit – Methode und Konzeption der curricularen Delphi-Studie Chemie sowie Ergebnisse aus dem ersten Untersuchungsabschnitt [Contours of desirable chemistry-related education in the opinion of a selected public – method and concept of a curricular Delphi study chemistry and results from the first survey], Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 9, 7-26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolte, C. (2003b). Chemiebezogene Bildung zwischen Wunsch und Wirklichkeit – Ausgewählte Ergebnisse aus dem zweiten Untersuchungsabschnitt der curricularen Delphi-Studie Chemie [Chemistry-related education between desire and reality – selected results from the second survey of the curricular Delphi study chemistry], Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 9, 27-42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borowski, A., Neuhaus, B. J., Tepner, O. Wirth, J., Fischer, H. E., Leutner, D., Sandmann, A. & Sumfleth, E. (2010). Professionswissen von Lehrkräften in den Naturwissenschaften (ProwiN) – Kurzdarstellung des BMBF-Projekts [Professional knowledge of science teachers – Summary of the BMBF-project], Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 341-349.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buchholtz, N., Kaiser, G. & Stancel-Piqtak, A. (2011). Professionelles Wissen von Studierenden des Lehr-amts Mathematik [Professional knowledge of student teachers in mathematics]. In: Blömeke, S., Bremerich-Vos, A., Haudeck, H., Kaiser, G., Nold, G., Schwippert, K. & Willenberg, H. (Eds.). Kompetenzen von Lehramtsstudierenden in gering strukturierten Domänen [Competences of teacher students in low-structured domains] Waxmann, Münster, Germany, 101-133.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buddrus, J. & Schmidt, B. (2015). Grundlagen der organischen Chemie [Basis of organic chemistry]. De Gruyter Verlag Berlin, Germany.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bühner, M. (2011). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion [Introduction to test and questionnaire design]. Pearson, Hallbergmoos, Germany.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burke, M. J., Finkelstein, L. M. & Dusig, M. S. (1999). On average deviation indices for estimating interrater agreement, Organizational Research Methods, 2(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819921004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Charro, E. (2020). A curricular Delphi study to improve the science education of secondary school students in Spain. J. Res. Sci. Teach, 1-23.https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21655
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clayden, J., Greeves, N. & Warren, S. (2013). Organische Chemie [Organic chemistry]. Springer Spektrum Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glowinski, I. & Wendland, M. (2020). Professionsorientierung von Praxisphasen – Ergebnisse einer Fragenbogenstudie. In J. Jennek & J. Goral (Ed.), Potsdamer Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung Band 2: Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen. Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universität Potsdam [Potsdam contributions to the teacher education and education research, volume 2: Professionalisation in practical phases. Results of the teacher education research at the University of Potsdam]. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gorghiu, L. M., Gorghiu, G., Olteanu, R. L., Dumitrescu, C., Suduc, A. M. & Bizoi, M. (2013). Delphi Study – A comprehensive method for outlining aspects and approaches of modern science education, Procedia –Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 535-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.102
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Häder, M. (2000). Die Expertenauswahl bei Delphi-Befragungen [expert choice for Delphi studies]. https://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/forschung/publikationen/gesis_reihen/howto/how-to5mh.pdf (accessed September 2020)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Häder, M. (2014). Delphi-Befragungen – ein Arbeitsbuch [Delphi-questionnaires – a workbook]. Springer Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hermanns, J. (2019). Erweitertes Fachwissen für den schulischen Kontext – Konzeption und Evaluation von Aufgaben zur Vorlesung “Organische Experimentalchemie I” [school related content knowledge – conception and evaluation of tasks for the course “organic chemistry”], CHEMKON, 26(1), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ckon.201800024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hermanns, J. & Keller, D. (2019). School-related content knowledge in organic chemistry – how different school curricula should be considered for the development of tasks. Progress in Science Education, 2(1), 17-27.https://doi.org/10.25321/prise.2019.888
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hill, K. Q. & Fowles, J. (1975). The methodological worth of the Delphi forecasting technique. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (7), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(75)90057-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kultusministerkonferenz (2004): https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2004/2004_12_16-Bildungsstandards-Chemie.pdf (accessed September 2020)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kraus, S., Neubrand, M., Blum, W., Baumert, J., Brunner, M., Kunter, M. & Jordan, A. (2008). Die Untersuchung des professionellen Wissens deutscher Mathematik-Lehrerinnen und –Lehrer im Rahmen der COACTIV-Studie [The examination of the professional knowledge of mathematics teacher in the COAC-TIV-study], Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 28(3/4), 223-258.10.1007/BF03339063
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuckartz, U., Rädiker, S., Ebert, T. & Schehl, J. (2013). Statistik – eine verständliche Einführung [statistics – a comprehensible introduction], Springer Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany.10.1007/978-3-531-19890-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kunina-Habenicht, O., Lohse-Bossenz, H., Kunter, M., Dicke, T., Förster, D., Gößling, J., Schulze-Stocker, F., Schmeck, A., Baumert, J., Leutner, D. & Terhart, E. (2012), Welche bildungswissenschaftlichen Inhalte sind wichtig in der Lehrerbildung? – Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Studie [Which educational science contents are important in teacher education? Results of a Delphi-study], Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 15(4), 649-682. DOI: 10.1007/s11618-012-0324-610.1007/s11618-012-0324-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massolt, J. & Borowski, A. (2018). Increasing the perceived relevance of university physics problems by focusing on school-related content knowledge, heiEDUCATION Journal, 1/2, 99-125. https://doi.org/10.17885/heiup.heied.2018.1-2.23828
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Melton, L. A., Parr, C. A., Caldwell, R. A. & Sherry, A. D. (1977). A study of undergraduate education in chemistry by the Delphi technique, Journal of chemical education, 54(10), 640-641.10.1021/ed054p640
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Osborne, J., Ratcliffe, M., Collins, S., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2001). What should we teach about science: A Delphi Study. London: Kings College.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paiva, J., Morais, C. & Barros, J. (2013). Profiles – Curricular Delphi Study on Science Education: http://www.profiles.org.pt/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Report_PT_delphi_3nd-round.pdf (accessed May 2019).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rose, M. A., Geesa, R. L. & Stith, K. (2019) STEM leader excellence: a modified Delphi study of critical skills, competencies, and qualities. Journal of Technology Education 31(1), 42-62. DOI: 10.21061/jte.v31i1.a.310.21061/jte.v31i1.a.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sahin, A. E. (2010). Professional status of elementary teaching in Turkey: a Delphi study. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 16(4), 437-459. doi:10.1080/1354060100375482210.1080/13540601003754822
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.10.3102/0013189X015002004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shulman, L.S. (1998). Theory, practice, and the education of professionals. The Elementary School Journal, 98(5), 511-526.10.1086/461912
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woehlecke, S., Massolt, J., Goral, J., Hassan-Yavuz, S., Seider, J., Borowski, A., Fenn, M., Kortenkamp, U. & Glowinski, I. (2017). Das erweiterte Fachwissen für den schulischen Kontext als fachübergreifendes Konstrukt und die Anwendung im universitären Lehramtsstudium [A cross-disciplinary construct of school-related content knowledge and its application in initial teacher education], Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung, 35(3), 413-426.
]Search in Google Scholar
