[
Abd-El-Khalick, F., et al (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011810.1002/sce.10118
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Achieve, Inc., on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the N. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/nextgeneration-science-standards
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aepkers, M. (2002). Forschendes Lernen - Einem Begriff auf der Spur. In M. Aepkers & S. Liebig (Eds.), Entdeckendes, Forschendes und Genetisches Lernen (pp. 69–87). Hohengehren: Schneider Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alboteanu-Schirner, A., Buric, R., Burisch, C., Emse, A., Lauterjung, D., Lauterjung, S., & Rübbelke, A. (2013). Universum Physik. Berlin: Cornelsen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AQA. (2014). GCE AS and A level specification. Manchester: AQA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnold, J. C., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Understanding students’ experiments — What kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks? International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2719–2749. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.93020910.1080/09500693.2014.930209
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnold, J., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Schüler als Forscher. MNU, 67(2), 83–91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnold, K., et al (2008). Fokus Chemie. Berlin: Cornelsen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Asselborn, W., & Jäckel, M. (2013). Chemie heute SI. Braunschweig: Schroedel.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beerenwinkel, A., & Gräsel, C. (2005). Texte im Chemieunterricht: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 11, 21–39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bohrmann-Linde, C., et al (2008a). Chemie 2000+ NRW7. (M. Tausch & M. von Wachtendonk, Eds.). Bamberg: C.C.Buchner.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bohrmann-Linde, C., et al. (2008b). Chemie 2000+ NRW8. (M. Tausch & M. von Wachtendonk, Eds.). Bamberg: C.C.Buchner.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bohrmann-Linde, C., et al (2008c). Chemie 2000+ NRW9. (M. Tausch & M. von Wachtendonk, Eds.). Bamberg: C.C.Buchner.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Böker, C., et al (2013). Fachwerk Chemie. Berlin: Cornelsen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braun, S., Strippel, C. G., & Sommer, K. (2017). Erkenntnisgewinnung in Schülervideos. In C. Maurer (Ed.), Implementation fachdidaktischer Innovation im Spiegel von Forschung und Praxis (pp. 716–719). Regensburg: Universität Regensburg.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brennecke, A., Küster, H., Leienbach, K.-W., & Post, M. (2013). Biosphäre Sekundarstufe I. Berlin: Cornelsen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bresler, S., et al (2011). Natur und Technik. Berlin: Cornelsen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Campanile, M. F., Lederman, N. G., & Kampourakis, K. (2015). Mendelian genetics as a platform for teaching about nature of science and scientific inquiry: The value of textbooks. Science and Education, 24(1–2), 205–225. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9607-410.1007/s11191-013-9607-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39.10.1080/03057260701828101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An Empirical Test of a Taxonomy of Responses to Anomalous Data in Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623–654.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1000110.1002/sce.10001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cieplik, D., et al (2011). Natur plus. Braunschweig: Schroedel.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crawford, B. A. (2014). From Inquiry to Scientific Practices in the Science Classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education Vol. II (pp. 515–541). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ebenezer, J., Kaya, O. N., & Ebenezer, D. L. (2011). Engaging students in environmental research projects: Perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 94–116. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2038710.1002/tea.20387
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friedrich, I., Gemballa, S., Küttner, R., Markl, J., Nolte, M., Roder, B., & Schmid, U. (2014). Markl Biologie I. (J. Markl & A. Gauss, Eds.). Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaigher, E., Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2014). Knowledge about Inquiry: A study in South African high schools. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3125–3147. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.95415610.1080/09500693.2014.954156
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grube, C. R. (2010). Kompetenzen naturwissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisgewinnung. Universität Kassel.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hammann, M. (2004). Kompetenzentwicklungsmodelle. MNU, 57(4), 196–203.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hammann, M., Phan, T. T. H., & Bayrhuber, H. (2007). Experimentieren als Problemlösen: Lässt sich das SDDS-Modell nutzen, um unterschiedliche Dimensionen beim Experimentieren zu messen? Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaften, Sonderheft, 33–49.10.1007/978-3-531-90865-6_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Härtig, H., Kauertz, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2012). Das Schulbuch im Physikunterricht. MNU, 65(4), 197–200.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hausfeld, R., & Schulenberg, W. (2008). BioSKOP SI. Braunschweig: Westermann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791–806. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2007210.1002/tea.20072
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuo, C.-Y., Wu, H.-K., Jen, T.-H., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2015). Development and Validation of a Multimedia-based Assessment of Scientific Inquiry Abilities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2326–2357. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.107852110.1080/09500693.2015.1078521
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry: The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2112510.1002/tea.21125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lederman, N. G. (2006). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 301–317). Dordrecht: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marniok, K., & Reiners, C. S. (2016). Die Repräsentation der Natur der Naturwissenschaften in Schulbüchern. CHEMKON, 23(2), 65–70.10.1002/ckon.201610265
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis - Theoretical Foundation and Basic Procedures. Klagenfurt.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Möller, A., Grube, C., Hartmann, S., & Mayer, J. (2009). Increase of inquiry competence: a longitudinal large scale assessment of students’ performance from grade 5 to 10. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Research Council [NRC]. (2000a). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Research Council [NRC]. (2000b). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neumann, I. (2011). Beyond physics content knowledge: Modeling competence regarding nature of scientific inquiry and nature of scientific knowledge. Berlin: Logos.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2013). Pisa 2015 Draft Science Framework.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Osborne, J. (2014). Scientific Practices and Inquiry in the Science Classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education Vol. II (pp. 579–599). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “‘ideas-about-science’” should be taught in school science ? A delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1010510.1002/tea.10105
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific Literacy, Science Literacy, and Science Education. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 545–558). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground – A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197. http://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.120635110.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sommer, K., & Pfeifer, P. (2018). Leitlinie Denk- und Arbeitsweisen der Chemie. In K. Sommer, J. Wambach-Laicher & P. Pfeifer (Eds.), Konkrete Fachdidaktik Chemie. Seelze: Friedrich.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ständige Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [KMK]. (2005a). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. München: Luchterhand.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ständige Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [KMK]. (2005b). Bildungsstandards im Fach Chemie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. München: Luchterhand.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ständige Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [KMK]. (2005c). Bildungsstandards im Fach Physik für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. München: Luchterhand.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strippel, C. G. (2017). Naturwissenschaftliche Erkenntnisgewinnung an chemischen Inhalten vermitteln - Konzeption und empirische Untersuchung einer Ausstellung mit Experimentierstation. Berlin: Logos.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strippel, C. G., & Sommer, K. (2015). Teaching Nature of Scientific Inquiry in Chemistry: How do German chemistry teachers use labwork to teach NOSI? International Journal of Science Education, 37(18), 2965–2986. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.111933010.1080/09500693.2015.1119330
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strippel, C. G., Tomala, L., & Sommer, K. (2017). Klappe, die Erste − Schüler produzieren eigene Experimentiervideos. MNU, 70(2), 105–111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sudeik, T., & Vorwerk, B. (2006). Natur bewusst. Braunschweig: Westermann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wellnitz, N., Fischer, H. E., Kauertz, A., Neumann, I., & Pant, H. A. (2012). Evaluation der Bildungsstandards – eine fächerübergreifende Testkonzeption für den Kompetenzbereich Erkenntnisgewinnung. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 18, 261–292.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wellnitz, N., Hecht, M., Heitmann, P., Kauertz, A., Mayer, J., Sumfleth, E., & Walpuski, M. (2016). Modellierung des Kompetenzteilbereichs naturwissenschaftliche Untersuchungen. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-016-0721-310.1007/s11618-016-0721-3
]Search in Google Scholar