A cross-subject content analysis of science textbooks using the understandings about scientific inquiry rubrics

Abd-El-Khalick, F., et al (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011810.1002/sce.10118 Search in Google Scholar

Achieve, Inc., on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the N. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/nextgeneration-science-standards Search in Google Scholar

Aepkers, M. (2002). Forschendes Lernen - Einem Begriff auf der Spur. In M. Aepkers & S. Liebig (Eds.), Entdeckendes, Forschendes und Genetisches Lernen (pp. 69–87). Hohengehren: Schneider Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

Alboteanu-Schirner, A., Buric, R., Burisch, C., Emse, A., Lauterjung, D., Lauterjung, S., & Rübbelke, A. (2013). Universum Physik. Berlin: Cornelsen. Search in Google Scholar

AQA. (2014). GCE AS and A level specification. Manchester: AQA. Search in Google Scholar

Arnold, J. C., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Understanding students’ experiments — What kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks? International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2719–2749. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.93020910.1080/09500693.2014.930209 Search in Google Scholar

Arnold, J., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Schüler als Forscher. MNU, 67(2), 83–91. Search in Google Scholar

Arnold, K., et al (2008). Fokus Chemie. Berlin: Cornelsen. Search in Google Scholar

Asselborn, W., & Jäckel, M. (2013). Chemie heute SI. Braunschweig: Schroedel. Search in Google Scholar

Beerenwinkel, A., & Gräsel, C. (2005). Texte im Chemieunterricht: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 11, 21–39. Search in Google Scholar

Bohrmann-Linde, C., et al (2008a). Chemie 2000+ NRW7. (M. Tausch & M. von Wachtendonk, Eds.). Bamberg: C.C.Buchner. Search in Google Scholar

Bohrmann-Linde, C., et al. (2008b). Chemie 2000+ NRW8. (M. Tausch & M. von Wachtendonk, Eds.). Bamberg: C.C.Buchner. Search in Google Scholar

Bohrmann-Linde, C., et al (2008c). Chemie 2000+ NRW9. (M. Tausch & M. von Wachtendonk, Eds.). Bamberg: C.C.Buchner. Search in Google Scholar

Böker, C., et al (2013). Fachwerk Chemie. Berlin: Cornelsen. Search in Google Scholar

Braun, S., Strippel, C. G., & Sommer, K. (2017). Erkenntnisgewinnung in Schülervideos. In C. Maurer (Ed.), Implementation fachdidaktischer Innovation im Spiegel von Forschung und Praxis (pp. 716–719). Regensburg: Universität Regensburg. Search in Google Scholar

Brennecke, A., Küster, H., Leienbach, K.-W., & Post, M. (2013). Biosphäre Sekundarstufe I. Berlin: Cornelsen. Search in Google Scholar

Bresler, S., et al (2011). Natur und Technik. Berlin: Cornelsen. Search in Google Scholar

Campanile, M. F., Lederman, N. G., & Kampourakis, K. (2015). Mendelian genetics as a platform for teaching about nature of science and scientific inquiry: The value of textbooks. Science and Education, 24(1–2), 205–225. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9607-410.1007/s11191-013-9607-4 Search in Google Scholar

Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39.10.1080/03057260701828101 Search in Google Scholar

Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An Empirical Test of a Taxonomy of Responses to Anomalous Data in Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623–654.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O Search in Google Scholar

Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1000110.1002/sce.10001 Search in Google Scholar

Cieplik, D., et al (2011). Natur plus. Braunschweig: Schroedel. Search in Google Scholar

Crawford, B. A. (2014). From Inquiry to Scientific Practices in the Science Classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education Vol. II (pp. 515–541). New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Ebenezer, J., Kaya, O. N., & Ebenezer, D. L. (2011). Engaging students in environmental research projects: Perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 94–116. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2038710.1002/tea.20387 Search in Google Scholar

Friedrich, I., Gemballa, S., Küttner, R., Markl, J., Nolte, M., Roder, B., & Schmid, U. (2014). Markl Biologie I. (J. Markl & A. Gauss, Eds.). Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

Gaigher, E., Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2014). Knowledge about Inquiry: A study in South African high schools. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3125–3147. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.95415610.1080/09500693.2014.954156 Search in Google Scholar

Grube, C. R. (2010). Kompetenzen naturwissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisgewinnung. Universität Kassel. Search in Google Scholar

Hammann, M. (2004). Kompetenzentwicklungsmodelle. MNU, 57(4), 196–203. Search in Google Scholar

Hammann, M., Phan, T. T. H., & Bayrhuber, H. (2007). Experimentieren als Problemlösen: Lässt sich das SDDS-Modell nutzen, um unterschiedliche Dimensionen beim Experimentieren zu messen? Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaften, Sonderheft, 33–49.10.1007/978-3-531-90865-6_3 Search in Google Scholar

Härtig, H., Kauertz, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2012). Das Schulbuch im Physikunterricht. MNU, 65(4), 197–200. Search in Google Scholar

Hausfeld, R., & Schulenberg, W. (2008). BioSKOP SI. Braunschweig: Westermann. Search in Google Scholar

Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791–806. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2007210.1002/tea.20072 Search in Google Scholar

Kuo, C.-Y., Wu, H.-K., Jen, T.-H., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2015). Development and Validation of a Multimedia-based Assessment of Scientific Inquiry Abilities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2326–2357. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.107852110.1080/09500693.2015.1078521 Search in Google Scholar

Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry: The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2112510.1002/tea.21125 Search in Google Scholar

Lederman, N. G. (2006). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 301–317). Dordrecht: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Marniok, K., & Reiners, C. S. (2016). Die Repräsentation der Natur der Naturwissenschaften in Schulbüchern. CHEMKON, 23(2), 65–70.10.1002/ckon.201610265 Search in Google Scholar

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis - Theoretical Foundation and Basic Procedures. Klagenfurt. Search in Google Scholar

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Search in Google Scholar

Möller, A., Grube, C., Hartmann, S., & Mayer, J. (2009). Increase of inquiry competence: a longitudinal large scale assessment of students’ performance from grade 5 to 10. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Search in Google Scholar

National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Search in Google Scholar

National Research Council [NRC]. (2000a). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Search in Google Scholar

National Research Council [NRC]. (2000b). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Search in Google Scholar

National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Search in Google Scholar

Neumann, I. (2011). Beyond physics content knowledge: Modeling competence regarding nature of scientific inquiry and nature of scientific knowledge. Berlin: Logos. Search in Google Scholar

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2013). Pisa 2015 Draft Science Framework. Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, J. (2014). Scientific Practices and Inquiry in the Science Classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education Vol. II (pp. 579–599). New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “‘ideas-about-science’” should be taught in school science ? A delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1010510.1002/tea.10105 Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific Literacy, Science Literacy, and Science Education. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 545–558). New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground – A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197. http://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.120635110.1080/03057267.2016.1206351 Search in Google Scholar

Sommer, K., & Pfeifer, P. (2018). Leitlinie Denk- und Arbeitsweisen der Chemie. In K. Sommer, J. Wambach-Laicher & P. Pfeifer (Eds.), Konkrete Fachdidaktik Chemie. Seelze: Friedrich. Search in Google Scholar

Ständige Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [KMK]. (2005a). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. München: Luchterhand. Search in Google Scholar

Ständige Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [KMK]. (2005b). Bildungsstandards im Fach Chemie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. München: Luchterhand. Search in Google Scholar

Ständige Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [KMK]. (2005c). Bildungsstandards im Fach Physik für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. München: Luchterhand. Search in Google Scholar

Strippel, C. G. (2017). Naturwissenschaftliche Erkenntnisgewinnung an chemischen Inhalten vermitteln - Konzeption und empirische Untersuchung einer Ausstellung mit Experimentierstation. Berlin: Logos. Search in Google Scholar

Strippel, C. G., & Sommer, K. (2015). Teaching Nature of Scientific Inquiry in Chemistry: How do German chemistry teachers use labwork to teach NOSI? International Journal of Science Education, 37(18), 2965–2986. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.111933010.1080/09500693.2015.1119330 Search in Google Scholar

Strippel, C. G., Tomala, L., & Sommer, K. (2017). Klappe, die Erste − Schüler produzieren eigene Experimentiervideos. MNU, 70(2), 105–111. Search in Google Scholar

Sudeik, T., & Vorwerk, B. (2006). Natur bewusst. Braunschweig: Westermann. Search in Google Scholar

Wellnitz, N., Fischer, H. E., Kauertz, A., Neumann, I., & Pant, H. A. (2012). Evaluation der Bildungsstandards – eine fächerübergreifende Testkonzeption für den Kompetenzbereich Erkenntnisgewinnung. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 18, 261–292. Search in Google Scholar

Wellnitz, N., Hecht, M., Heitmann, P., Kauertz, A., Mayer, J., Sumfleth, E., & Walpuski, M. (2016). Modellierung des Kompetenzteilbereichs naturwissenschaftliche Untersuchungen. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-016-0721-310.1007/s11618-016-0721-3 Search in Google Scholar