Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Polish Journal of Microbiology
Volume 67 (2018): Numero 4 (December 2018)
Accesso libero
Comparison of the Photosensitivity of Biofilms of Different Genera of Cariogenic Bacteria in Tooth Slices
HOMA DARMANI
HOMA DARMANI
,
KHITAM H. TAWALBEH
KHITAM H. TAWALBEH
,
AHMAD S. AL-HIYASAT
AHMAD S. AL-HIYASAT
e
MOHAMMAD-ALI AL-AKHRAS
MOHAMMAD-ALI AL-AKHRAS
| 10 dic 2018
Polish Journal of Microbiology
Volume 67 (2018): Numero 4 (December 2018)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Article Category:
original-paper
Pubblicato online:
10 dic 2018
Pagine:
455 - 462
Ricevuto:
07 mag 2018
Accettato:
17 lug 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21307/pjm-2018-053
Parole chiave
cariogenic bacteria
,
planktonic
,
sessile cells
,
tooth slice
,
photodynamic therapy
© 2018 Homa Darmani et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1.
Viability (mean + SD) of S. mutans as planktonic cells in suspension and sessile cells (biofilms) on tooth slices treated with; Laser, TBO, and Laser with TBO relative to controls (100% viability). Asterisk symbol represents statistically significant differences in viability in comparison to treatment with laser alone and TBO alone.
Fig. 2.
Viability (mean + SD) of L. casei as planktonic cells in suspension and sessile cells (biofilms) on tooth slices treated with; Laser, TBO, and Laser with TBO relative to controls (100% viability). Asterisk symbol represents statistically significant differences in viability in comparison to treatment with laser alone and TBO alone.
Fig. 3.
Viability (mean + SD) of A. viscosus as planktonic cells in suspension and sessile cells (biofilms) on tooth slices treated with; Laser, TBO, and Laser with TBO relative to controls (100% viability). Asterisk symbol represents statistically significant differences in viability in comparison to treatment with laser alone and TBO alone.
Fig. 4.
Viability (mean + SD) of S. salivarius as planktonic cells in suspension and sessile cells (biofilms) on tooth slices treated with; Laser, TBO, and Laser with TBO relative to controls (100% viability).