The Herbst appliance and the Activator: influence of the vertical facial pattern

1. Woods MG. Sagittal mandibular changes with overbite correction in subjects with different mandibular growth directions: late mixed-dentition treatment effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:388-94.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.037Search in Google Scholar

2. McNamara JA Jr. Components of Class II malocclusions in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981;51:177-202.Search in Google Scholar

3. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Class II Division 2 malocclusion: genetics or environment? A case report of monozygotic twins. Angle Orthod 1999;69:321-4.Search in Google Scholar

4. Moss ML, Salentijn L. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod 1969;55:566-77.10.1016/0002-9416(69)90034-7Search in Google Scholar

5. Phan KL, Bendeus M, Hägg U, Hansen K, Rabie AB. Comparison of the headgear activator and Herbst appliance – effects and posttreatment changes. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:594-604.10.1093/ejo/cjl05217142260Search in Google Scholar

6. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:599.e1-12.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.01016679196Search in Google Scholar

7. Bock N, Pancherz H. Herbst treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in retrognathic and prognathic facial types – A cephalometric long-term retrospective study. Angle Orthod 2006;76:930-41.10.2319/100605-35217090166Search in Google Scholar

8. Björk A. Variations in the growth patterns of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res 1963;42:400-11.10.1177/0022034563042001470113971295Search in Google Scholar

9. Pepicelli AJ, Woods MG, Briggs C. The mandibular muscles and their importance in contemporary orthodontics: a contemporary review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:774-80.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.02316360920Search in Google Scholar

10. Chan HJ, Woods MG, Stella D. Three-dimensional computed craniofacial tomography (3D-CT): potential uses and limitations. Aust Orthod J 2007;23:55-64.Search in Google Scholar

11. Chan HJ, Woods MG, Stella D. Mandibular muscle morphology in children with different vertical facial patterns: A 3-dimensional computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:10.e1-13.10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.01318174063Search in Google Scholar

12. Wong A, Woods MG, Stella D. Three-dimensional computed tomographic assessment of mandibular muscles in growing subjects with different vertical facial patterns. Aust Orthod J 2016;32:2-17.10.21307/aoj-2020-107Search in Google Scholar

13. Baltromejus S, Ruf S, Pancherz H. Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: Activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:627-37.10.1093/ejo/24.6.62712512780Search in Google Scholar

14. Woods MG. The use of a simple functional appliance as an adjunct to fixed appliance orthodontic treatment. Case reports. Aust Dent J 1996;41:221-34.10.1111/j.1834-7819.1996.tb04864.xSearch in Google Scholar

15. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 2005;11:119-29.10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005Search in Google Scholar

16. Franchi L and Baccetti T. Prediction of individual mandibular changes induced by functional jaw orthopedics followed by fixed appliances in Class II patients. Angle Orthod 2006;76:950-4.10.2319/110205-385Search in Google Scholar

17. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA, Hunter WS. An atlas of craniofacial growth: cephalometric standards from the University School Growth Study, Centre for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

18. Hägg U, Rabie AB, Bendeus M, Wong RW, Wey MC, Du X et al. Condylar growth and mandibular positioning with stepwise vs maximum advancement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:525-3610.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.064Search in Google Scholar

19. Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopedics or orthognathic surgery: is it a matter of age? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:571-4.Search in Google Scholar

20. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:607-18.10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70285-4Search in Google Scholar

21. Ruf S, Pancherz H. The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: A cephalometric roentgenographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:225-9.10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70113-0Search in Google Scholar

22. Pancherz H, Michailidou C. Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:153-61.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.07.01515316469Search in Google Scholar

23. Shell TL, Woods MG. Perception of facial esthetics: a comparison of similar cases treated with attempted growth modification or later orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 2003;73:365-73.Search in Google Scholar

24. Shell TL, Woods MG. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical Class II treatment. Aust Orthod J 2004;20:51-63.Search in Google Scholar

25. Deen E, Woods MG. Effects of the Herbst appliance in growing orthodontic patients with different underlying vertical patterns. Aust Orthod J 2015;31:59-68.10.21307/aoj-2020-141Search in Google Scholar

26. Brodie AG. Facial patterns: a theme on variation. Angle Orthod 1946;16:75-87.Search in Google Scholar