A Case Study on the Impact of Building Envelope on Energy Efficiency in High-Rise Residential Buildings
e | 08 apr 2020
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 08 apr 2020
Pagine: 5 - 18
Ricevuto: 25 set 2019
Accettato: 04 mar 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2020-001
Parole chiave
© 2020 Dinçer Aydin et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
![Residential buildings energy consumptions [7]](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64706fc283f1392090d697db/j_acee-2020-001_fig_001.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20240602T141414Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=18000&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKP25APDM2%2F20240602%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=a8337782e1c4987550d0da2c438c7dff0ad6cb3095b1a9b5269bf714c11b4045)
Figure 2.
![BIM dimensions [30]](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64706fc283f1392090d697db/j_acee-2020-001_fig_002.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20240602T141414Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=18000&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKP25APDM2%2F20240602%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=7eeecf3cac03a36afe16a98efa665dafcacdb56e3e8a9164da7e2bac9ee5ffa0)
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
Figure 11.
Figure 12.
Energy consumption comparison of the different high-rise residential buildings [34–38]
| Country | TURKEY | CHINA | SOUTH KOREA | CANADA | |
| Location | Istanbul | Shanghai | Seoul | British Colombia | |
| Year | 2006-2010 | 1995 | 2000 | 2008-2010 | 1974-2002 |
| Façade Design | Double-Layered Skin With Air Corridor | Single-Skin | Single-Skin | Single-Skin | Single-Skin |
| Heating Energy Load (kWh/m2) | 65.8 | 101.7 | 105.6 | 123.2 | 111.0 |
| Total Energy Load (kWh/m2) | 226.4 | 182.2 | 179.2 | 212.1 | 213.0 |
Transparency ratio of the building envelope. Source: Authors
| Facade | Surface Area | Transparency Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transparent | Opaque | ||
| North – South | 3.350 m2 | 3.910 m2 | %46 |
| East – West | 10.295 m2 | 1.585 m2 | %87 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thermophysical properties of the envelope. Source: Dekoral; Façade Construction Company
| Façade | Properties | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Façade Component | Thickness | TOTAL U-Value | |
| Opaque Curtain-wall | Gypsum Plaster | 20 mm | 0.20 W/m2;K |
| Reinforced Shear Wall | 800 mm | ||
| Rock Wool Insulation | 80 mm | ||
| Air Gap | 100 mm | ||
| Enamel Painted Glass (6mm+1.5mm+10 mm) | 175 mm | ||
| Glass Curtain-wall | Glass (with 0.691 SHGC) | – | 1.10 W/m2;K |
| Metal Facade System Profile | – | 2.00 W/m2;K | |
General features of Sapphire Residence Tower. Source: Authors
| Climate Data | Location | 4.Levent, Istanbul – TURKEY | |||
| Coordinate | 41°5’6.28” North | 29°0’21.96” East | |||
| Altitude | 124 m | ||||
| Heating Degree-Days Zone | 2nd HDD (internationally 2700 HDDs) | ||||
| Architectural Space Data | Total Building Floor Area | 59.744 m2 | |||
| Total Building Volume | 250.580 m3 | ||||
| Area-Volume Ratio (A / V) | 0,24 | ||||
| Heat-Loss Surface Area by Direction | North & South | 7.260 m2 | East & West | 11.880 m2 | |
| Total Facade Area | 38.280 m2 | ||||
| Facade Transparency Ratio | %71 | ||||
| Mechanical System Data | Heating System | Floor Heating, Floor Type Fan Coil | |||
| Fuel of Heating System | Natural Gas | ||||
| Cooling System | Fan Coil and Natural Ventilation | ||||
| Fuel of Cooling System | Electricity | ||||
| Conditioned Area | 52.791 m2 | ||||
| Unconditioned Area | 6.953 m2 | ||||