A Case Study on the Impact of Building Envelope on Energy Efficiency in High-Rise Residential Buildings
und
08. Apr. 2020
Über diesen Artikel
Online veröffentlicht: 08. Apr. 2020
Seitenbereich: 5 - 18
Eingereicht: 25. Sept. 2019
Akzeptiert: 04. März 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2020-001
Schlüsselwörter
© 2020 Dinçer Aydin et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
![Residential buildings energy consumptions [7]](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64706fc283f1392090d697db/j_acee-2020-001_fig_001.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20250906%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20250906T120134Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=0cf40b7bcfbb3e7b733304600c09d1870b2f1b94a2dcd5f3ed02f3c28ee81bd7&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 2.
![BIM dimensions [30]](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64706fc283f1392090d697db/j_acee-2020-001_fig_002.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20250906%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20250906T120134Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=df7c3e470944d23d911596b538ade8ed7d6da9e19df0369e690d509ec457b00c&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Energy consumption comparison of the different high-rise residential buildings [34–38]
Country | TURKEY | CHINA | SOUTH KOREA | CANADA | |
Location | Istanbul | Shanghai | Seoul | British Colombia | |
Year | 2006-2010 | 1995 | 2000 | 2008-2010 | 1974-2002 |
Façade Design | Double-Layered Skin With Air Corridor | Single-Skin | Single-Skin | Single-Skin | Single-Skin |
Heating Energy Load (kWh/m2) | 65.8 | 101.7 | 105.6 | 123.2 | 111.0 |
Total Energy Load (kWh/m2) | 226.4 | 182.2 | 179.2 | 212.1 | 213.0 |
Transparency ratio of the building envelope_ Source: Authors
Facade | Surface Area | Transparency Ratio | |
---|---|---|---|
Transparent | Opaque | ||
North – South | 3.350 m2 | 3.910 m2 | %46 |
East – West | 10.295 m2 | 1.585 m2 | %87 |
|
|
|
|
Thermophysical properties of the envelope_ Source: Dekoral; Façade Construction Company
Façade | Properties | ||
---|---|---|---|
Façade Component | Thickness | TOTAL U-Value | |
Opaque Curtain-wall | Gypsum Plaster | 20 mm | 0.20 W/m2;K |
Reinforced Shear Wall | 800 mm | ||
Rock Wool Insulation | 80 mm | ||
Air Gap | 100 mm | ||
Enamel Painted Glass (6mm+1.5mm+10 mm) | 175 mm | ||
Glass Curtain-wall | Glass (with 0.691 SHGC) | – | 1.10 W/m2;K |
Metal Facade System Profile | – | 2.00 W/m2;K |
General features of Sapphire Residence Tower_ Source: Authors
Climate Data | Location | 4.Levent, Istanbul – TURKEY | |||
Coordinate | 41°5’6.28” North | 29°0’21.96” East | |||
Altitude | 124 m | ||||
Heating Degree-Days Zone | 2nd HDD (internationally 2700 HDDs) | ||||
Architectural Space Data | Total Building Floor Area | 59.744 m2 | |||
Total Building Volume | 250.580 m3 | ||||
Area-Volume Ratio (A / V) | 0,24 | ||||
Heat-Loss Surface Area by Direction | North & South | 7.260 m2 | East & West | 11.880 m2 | |
Total Facade Area | 38.280 m2 | ||||
Facade Transparency Ratio | %71 | ||||
Mechanical System Data | Heating System | Floor Heating, Floor Type Fan Coil | |||
Fuel of Heating System | Natural Gas | ||||
Cooling System | Fan Coil and Natural Ventilation | ||||
Fuel of Cooling System | Electricity | ||||
Conditioned Area | 52.791 m2 | ||||
Unconditioned Area | 6.953 m2 |