Comparative Study of Trace Metrics between Bibliometrics and Patentometrics

Fred Y. Ye; Mu-Hsuan Huang; Dar-Zen Chen

Accesso libero

Comparative Study of Trace Metrics between Bibliometrics and Patentometrics

Fred Y. Ye

Mu-Hsuan Huang

Dar-Zen Chen

| 01 set 2017

Journal of Data and Information Science

Volume 1 (2016): Numero 2 (May 2016)

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Articolo precedente

Articolo Successivo

Cita

Article Category: Research Paper

Pubblicato online: 01 set 2017

Pagine: 13 - 31

Ricevuto: 20 feb 2016

Accettato: 12 mag 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20309/jdis.201611

Parole chiave
Performance matrix, Trace metrics, -index, -core, I3, Bibliometrics, Patentometrics

© 2016 Fred Y. Ye, Mu-Hsuan Huang, Dar-Zen Chen

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Rank-citation curve with information on the number of publications. The area under the rank-citation curve is divided into four sections: the h-area, based on the h-index; the e-area, containing the excess citations of the first h papers to the h-area; the t-area, containing citations of the papers that has lower citations than h, but still representing a contribution; and the uncited area.

Academic traces Tl, T2, and ST; citations per paper (C/P), and h-index for the top 30 universities in computer sciences (2010–2014).

Values of T1, T2, ST, C/P, and h-index for the top 30 assignees (2010–2014).

Impact traces TlT2, and ST; citations per paper, and h-index for the top 30 highly cited computer science papers (2010–2014).

Values of T1, T2, ST, C/P, and the h-index for the top 30 highly cited patents (2010–2014).

Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients among the C/P, h, T1, T2, and ST of the top 30 assignees.

	T₁	T₂	ST	C/P	h
Pearson	T₁	T₂	ST	C/P	h
T₁	1	−0.248	0.093	0.932 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.275
T₂	−0.507 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1	0.655 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	−0.094	0.519 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
ST	−0.482 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.881 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1	0.275	0.799 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
CP	0.303	−0.099	0.177	1	0.488 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
h	−0.151	0.646 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.750 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	−0.121	1

Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients among the C, h, T1, T2, and ST of the top 30 highly cited patents.

	T₁	T₂	ST	C/P	h
Pearson	T₁	T₂	ST	C/P	h
T₁	1	0.830 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.988 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.963 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.892 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
T₂	0.276	1	0.815 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.839 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.747 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
ST	0.989 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.363 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1	0.964 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.905 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
C/P	0.962 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.410 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.975 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1	0.959 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
h	0.976 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.347 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.975 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.985 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1

Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients among the C/P, h, T1, T2, and ST of the top 30 universities.

	T₁	T₂	ST	C/P	h
Pearson	T₁	T₂	ST	C/P	h
T₁	1	0.581 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.988 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.730 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.721 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
T₂	0.593 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1	0.598 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.065	0.755 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
ST	0.994 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.624 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1	0.715 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.749 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
C/P	0.766 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.104	0.752 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1	0.460 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
h	0.751 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.745 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.790 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.519 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1

List of top 30 highly cited paper in the field “computer sciences” from ESI.

No.	Authors	Journal	Publication year
P1	Robinson, M.D. et al.	Bioinformatics	2010
P2	Li, H. & Durbin, R.	Bioinformatics	2010
P3	Edgar, R.C.	Bioinformatics	2010
P4	Quinlan, A.R. & Hall, I.M.	Bioinformatics	2010
P5	Bullard, J.H. et al.	BMC Bioinformatics	2010
P6	Smoot, M.E. et al.	Bioinformatics	2011
P7	Willer, C.J. et al.	Bioinformatics	2010
P8	Wu, T.D. & Nacu, S.	Bioinformatics	2010
P9	Wang, L.K. et al.	Bioinformatics	2010
P10	Pruim, R.J. et al.	Bioinformatics	2010
P11	Quince, C. et al.	BMC Bioinformatics	2011
P12	Milne, I. et al.	Bioinformatics	2010
P13	Caporaso, J.G. et al.	Bioinformatics	2010
P14	Hadfield, J.D.	Journal of Statistical Software	2010
P15	Edgar, R.C. et al.	Bioinformatics	2011
P16	MacLean, B. et al.	Bioinformatics	2010
P17	Friedman, J. et al.	Journal of Statistical Software	2010
P18	McLaren, W. et al.	Bioinformatics	2010
P19	Hyatt, D. et al.	BMC Bioinformatics	2010
P20	Viechtbauer, W.	Journal of Statistical Software	2010
P21	Kembel, S.W. et al.	Bioinformatics	2010
P22	Danecek, P. et al.	Bioinformatics	2011
P23	Martin, D.P. et al.	Bioinformatics	2010
P24	Huang, Y. et al.	Bioinformatics	2010
P25	Pluskal, T. et al.	BMC Bioinformatics	2010
P26	Yu, N.Y. et al.	Bioinformatics	2010
P27	O’Boyle, N.M. et al.	Journal of Cheminformatics	2011
P28	Dweep, H. et al.	Journal of Biomedical Informatics	2011
P29	Baraniuk, R.G. et al.	IEEE Transactions on Information Theory	2010
P30	Robin, X. et al.	BMC Bioinformatics	2011

Original records of top 30 cited patents in “computer software & hardware”.

Patent	Patent number	Year	Assignee
P1	7665051	2010	Qimonda AG
P2	7802219	2010	Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
P3	7917877	2011	Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
P4	7712056	2010	Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
P5	7962867	2011	Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
P6	7992122	2011	GG Technology, Inc.
P7	7971160	2011	Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited
P8	7738971	2010	Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
P9	8306853	2012	Colts Laboratories
P10	7693720	2010	VoiceBox Technologies, Inc.
P11	7949529	2011	VoiceBox Technologies, Inc.
P12	8301709	2012	Google Inc.
P13	7685126	2010	Isilon Systems, Inc.
P14	7716171	2010	EMC Corporation
P15	7650009	2010	Digimarc Corporation
P16	7809167	2010	Bell_Matthew
P17	8032409	2011	Accenture Global Services Limited
P18	7840537	2010	CommVault Systems, Inc.
P19	7827208	2010	Facebook, Inc.
P20	7643649	2010	Digimarc Corporation
P21	7647237	2010	MiniMed, Inc.
P22	7698160	2010	VirtualAgility, Inc
P23	7685254	2010	Pandya_Ashish A.
P24	7697719	2010	Digimarc Corporation
P25	7751596	2010	Digimarc Corporation
P26	7657849	2010	Apple Inc.
P27	7760905	2010	Digimarc Corporation
P28	7797204	2010	Balent_Bruce F.
P29	7653883	2010	Apple Inc.
P30	8200775	2012	Newsilike Media Group, Inc

Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients among the C/P, h, T1, T2, and ST of the top 30 highly cited papers.

	T₁	T₂	ST	C/P	h
Pearson	T₁	T₂	ST	C/P	h
T₁	1	0.868 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.994 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.926 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.922 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
T2	0.820 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1	0.838 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.746 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.907 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
ST	0.992 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.828 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1	0.926 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.915 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
CP	0.901 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.627 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.880 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1	0.867 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.
h	0.793 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.897 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.827 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	0.706 Significant correlation at 0.01 level.	1

eISSN:: 2543-683X
Lingua:: Inglese

Frequenza di pubblicazione:: 4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:: Computer Sciences, Information Technology, Project Management, Databases and Data Mining

Feed RSS della rivista

Comparative Study of Trace Metrics between Bibliometrics and Patentometrics

Article Category: Research Paper

Pubblicato online: 01 set 2017

Pagine: 13 - 31

Ricevuto: 20 feb 2016

Accettato: 12 mag 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20309/jdis.201611

Parole chiave
Performance matrix, Trace metrics, -index, -core, I3, Bibliometrics, Patentometrics

© 2016 Fred Y. Ye, Mu-Hsuan Huang, Dar-Zen Chen

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients among the C/P, h, T1, T2, and ST of the top 30 assignees.

Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients among the C, h, T1, T2, and ST of the top 30 highly cited patents.

Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients among the C/P, h, T1, T2, and ST of the top 30 universities.

List of top 30 highly cited paper in the field “computer sciences” from ESI.

Original records of top 30 cited patents in “computer software & hardware”.

Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients among the C/P, h, T1, T2, and ST of the top 30 highly cited papers.

Comparative Study of Trace Metrics between Bibliometrics and Patentometrics

Article Category: Research Paper

Pubblicato online: 01 set 2017

Pagine: 13 - 31

Ricevuto: 20 feb 2016

Accettato: 12 mag 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20309/jdis.201611

Parole chiavePerformance matrix, Trace metrics, -index, -core, I3, Bibliometrics, Patentometrics

© 2016 Fred Y. Ye, Mu-Hsuan Huang, Dar-Zen Chen

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients among the C/P, h, T1, T2, and ST of the top 30 assignees.

Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients among the C, h, T1, T2, and ST of the top 30 highly cited patents.

Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients among the C/P, h, T1, T2, and ST of the top 30 universities.

List of top 30 highly cited paper in the field “computer sciences” from ESI.

Original records of top 30 cited patents in “computer software & hardware”.

Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients among the C/P, h, T1, T2, and ST of the top 30 highly cited papers.

Parole chiave
Performance matrix, Trace metrics, -index, -core, I3, Bibliometrics, Patentometrics