Fostering sustainable development through the European Digital Single Market

Alves, E. E. C., & Biancarelli, A. M. (2020). Financial cooperation initiatives in Latin America: Conditions of origins, subsistence and eventual vanishing. Economics and Business Review, 20(4), 51-71. doi:10.18559/ebr.2020.4.410.18559/ebr.2020.4.4Search in Google Scholar

Azmanova, A., & Pallemaerts, M. (Eds.) (2006). The European Union and sustainable development. Internal and external dimensions. Brussels: Brussels University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bainbridge, W. S., & Roco, M. C. (2016). Science and technology convergence: With emphasis for nanotechnology-inspired convergence. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 18(7), 2-19. doi:10.1007/s11051-016-3520-010.1007/s11051-016-3520-0Search in Google Scholar

Barbier, E., Markandya, A., & Pearce, D. W. (1990). Environmental sustainability and cost-benefit analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 22(9), 1259-1266.10.1068/a221259Search in Google Scholar

Barlett, P. F., & Chase, G. W. (Eds.) (2013). Sustainability in higher education: Stories and strategies for transformation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9418.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bayer, F., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, Ch., Itúrbide, A., Irribarren-Maestro, I., Reding, S. (2019). Investigating SSH research and publication practices in disciplinary and institutional contexts. A survey-based comparative approach in two universities. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 4, 1-18.10.3389/frma.2019.00001Search in Google Scholar

Bexell, M., & Jönsson, K. (2017). Responsibility and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1), 13-29.10.1080/08039410.2016.1252424Search in Google Scholar

Boas, I., Biermann, F., & Kanie, N. (2016). Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: Towards a nexus approach. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 449-464.10.1007/s10784-016-9321-1Search in Google Scholar

Bolcárová, P., & Kološta, S. (2015). Assessment of sustainable development in the EU 27 using aggregated SD Index. Ecological Indicators, 48, 699-705.10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oaSearch in Google Scholar

COM. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions European Data Strategy 66 final/10.03.2020. Brussels.Search in Google Scholar

Council of the European Union. (2020). Council Conclusions of 8 October 2020 on “Access to justice—harnessing the opportunities offered by digitalization”. Brussels.Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advance mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Damioli, G., & Vértesy, D. (2020). The innovation output indicator 2019. JRC Technical Reports. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

DEF. (2016). Digital empowerment foundation. Retrieved from http://defindia.org/Search in Google Scholar

Diaconaşu, D. E., Crupenschi, V. M., & Pohoață, I. (2020). The sustainable development theory: A critical approach (vol. 1: The discourse of the founders). New York: Palgrave McMillan.Search in Google Scholar

Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast). Text with EEA relevance.Search in Google Scholar

Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2000/31/EC of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce).Search in Google Scholar

Dollar, D., Kleineberg, T., & Kraay, A. (2013). Growth still is good for the poor. (Policy Research Working Paper No. 6568). The Macroeconomics and Growth Team, Development Research Group. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.10.1596/1813-9450-6568Search in Google Scholar

Domorenok, E. (2019). Governing sustainability in the EU. From political discourse to policy practices. Abington & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315315003Search in Google Scholar

Duch-Brown, N., & Martens, B. (2016). The economic impact of removing geo-blocking restrictions in the EU Digital Single Market. (Digital Economy Working Paper No.2016/02). Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre.10.2139/ssrn.2783647Search in Google Scholar

Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90-100.10.2307/41165746Search in Google Scholar

ENISA. (2017). Overview on the implementation and uptake of trust services: One year after the switch over. European Union Agency for Network and Information Security.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2015a). Why we need a Digital Single Market. Retrieved June 20, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/dsm-fact-sheet_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2015b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and to the Committee of the Regions. A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0192&from=ENSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2015c). Europe’s Digital Single Market. Brussels, COM (2015), 192.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2018a). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Digital Europe Programme for the period 2021−2027. Explanatory memorandum 306 final. Brussels.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2018b). Digital Single Market 2018, High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/high-level-expert-group-artificial-intelligenceSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2020a). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Methodological Note. Retrieved June 6, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desiSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2020b). Shaping Europe’s digital future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament. (2017). Civil law rules on robotics. European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Giffi, C. (Ed.) (2019, July). Looking ahead. Staying ahead. Organizational transformation. Cyber. Future of mobility. Technology & Society, Deloitte Review, 25.Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 433-44810.1007/s10784-016-9323-zSearch in Google Scholar

Hák, T., Janousková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565-573.10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Hemmati, H., Dodds, F., & Enayati, J. (2002). Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability. Beyond deadlock and conflict. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd London.Search in Google Scholar

Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2014). Sustainable development: Our common future revisited. Global Environmental Change, 26(1), 130-139.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.006Search in Google Scholar

Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary General. (2019). Global sustainable development report: The future is now—Science for achieving sustainable development. New York: UN. Retrieved September 10, 2020 from https://sustain-abledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/24797GSDR_report_2019.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Jejdling, F. (2019, June). Ericsson mobility report. Retrieved June 18, 2020 from https://www.ericsson.com/assets/local/mobility-report/documents/2019/ericsson-mobility-report-june-2019.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Komiyama, K. H., & Takeuchi, K. (2006). Sustainability science: Building a new discipline. Sustainability Science, 1.10.1007/s11625-006-0007-4Search in Google Scholar

Krämer, J., Senellart, P., & de Streel, A. (2020). Making data portability more effective for the digital economy. Economic implications and regulatory challenges. Report. Brussels: CERRE.Search in Google Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411-433.10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lin, J. Y. (2012). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.10.1596/978-0-8213-8955-3Search in Google Scholar

Mărcuț, M. (2017). Crystalizing the EU digital policy. An exploration into the Digital Single Market. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-69227-2Search in Google Scholar

Mărcuț, M. (2019). Building a stronger Europe—Governing the Digital Single Market. In A. Adamczyk, M. Dziembała, A. Kłos & M. Pachocka (Eds.), EU facing current challenges, opportunities & conflicts (pp. 50-61). Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.Search in Google Scholar

Matusiak, M., Stancova, K. C., Dosso, M., Daniels, C., & Miedzenski, M. (2020). Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) for SDGs roadmaps. Background paper: Overview of the existing STI for SDGs roadmapping methodologies. New York: UN.Search in Google Scholar

Miedzinski, M., Kanehira, N., Cervantes, M., Mealy, S., Kotani, R., & Bollati E. (2020). Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) for SDGs Roadmaps—Background Paper: International STI collaboration and investment for Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/269391_BP_Roadmaps_IntlCollaberation_final_7_09_20.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Open Medicine, 3(3), 123-130. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.00510.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Mulder, P., & van Bergh, J. (2001, winter). Evolutionary economics theories of sustainable development. A Journal of Urban and Regional Policy, 32(1), 101-134.10.1111/0017-4815.00152Search in Google Scholar

OECD. (2015). OECD DSTI/STP/MIN(2015)1, Meeting of the OECD Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy at Ministerial Level: Creating our common future through science, technology and innovation. 20-21 October 2015, Daejeon. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/science/sci-tech/sti-ministerial-2015.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Paris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559-586.10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105551Search in Google Scholar

Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., … & Duffy S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Search in Google Scholar

Redclift, M. (1993). Sustainable development: Needs, values, rights. Environmental Values, 2(1), 3-20. doi:10.3197/09632719377667998110.3197/096327193776679981Search in Google Scholar

Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G,, & Fuller, G. (2019). Sustainable development report 2019. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).Search in Google Scholar

Scholte, J. A., & Söderbaum, F. (2017). A changing global development agenda?. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1), 1-12. doi:10.1080/08039410.2017.127584310.1080/08039410.2017.1275843Search in Google Scholar

Scott, J. M., Petropoulos, G., & Yeung, T. (2019). Contribution to growth: The European Digital Single Market. Delivering economic benefits for citizens and businesses. Luxembourg: European Parliament.Search in Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. (2019). People, power, and profits: Progressive capitalism for an age of discontent. London: Penguin UK.Search in Google Scholar

Stone, A. (2017). These 17 goals have a triple bottom line. Retrieved October 14, 2020 from https://ecopreserve.net/sdg/Search in Google Scholar

Streel de, A. (2019). The future of the digital market. Brussels: CERRE.Search in Google Scholar

The World in 2050. (2019). The digital revolution and sustainable development: Opportunities and challenges. Report prepared by The World in 2050 initiative. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Search in Google Scholar

Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. (2015). New York: United Nations. Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agendaSearch in Google Scholar

UN. (2020). The sustainable development goals report 2019. New York: United Nations.Search in Google Scholar

UN Environment. (2020, March 3). Coronavirus outbreak highlights need to address threats to ecosystems and wildlife. Retrieved January 18, 2021 from https://www.unenvironment.org/news-andstories/story/coronavirusoutbreak-highlights-need-address-threats-ecosystemsand-wildlifeSearch in Google Scholar

Young, O. R. (1997). Global Governance: Drawing insights from the environmental experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar