[Alves, E. E. C., & Biancarelli, A. M. (2020). Financial cooperation initiatives in Latin America: Conditions of origins, subsistence and eventual vanishing. Economics and Business Review, 20(4), 51-71. doi:10.18559/ebr.2020.4.410.18559/ebr.2020.4.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Azmanova, A., & Pallemaerts, M. (Eds.) (2006). The European Union and sustainable development. Internal and external dimensions. Brussels: Brussels University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bainbridge, W. S., & Roco, M. C. (2016). Science and technology convergence: With emphasis for nanotechnology-inspired convergence. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 18(7), 2-19. doi:10.1007/s11051-016-3520-010.1007/s11051-016-3520-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Barbier, E., Markandya, A., & Pearce, D. W. (1990). Environmental sustainability and cost-benefit analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 22(9), 1259-1266.10.1068/a221259]Search in Google Scholar
[Barlett, P. F., & Chase, G. W. (Eds.) (2013). Sustainability in higher education: Stories and strategies for transformation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9418.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Bayer, F., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, Ch., Itúrbide, A., Irribarren-Maestro, I., Reding, S. (2019). Investigating SSH research and publication practices in disciplinary and institutional contexts. A survey-based comparative approach in two universities. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 4, 1-18.10.3389/frma.2019.00001]Search in Google Scholar
[Bexell, M., & Jönsson, K. (2017). Responsibility and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1), 13-29.10.1080/08039410.2016.1252424]Search in Google Scholar
[Boas, I., Biermann, F., & Kanie, N. (2016). Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: Towards a nexus approach. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 449-464.10.1007/s10784-016-9321-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolcárová, P., & Kološta, S. (2015). Assessment of sustainable development in the EU 27 using aggregated SD Index. Ecological Indicators, 48, 699-705.10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]Search in Google Scholar
[COM. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions European Data Strategy 66 final/10.03.2020. Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council of the European Union. (2020). Council Conclusions of 8 October 2020 on “Access to justice—harnessing the opportunities offered by digitalization”. Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advance mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Damioli, G., & Vértesy, D. (2020). The innovation output indicator 2019. JRC Technical Reports. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[DEF. (2016). Digital empowerment foundation. Retrieved from http://defindia.org/]Search in Google Scholar
[Diaconaşu, D. E., Crupenschi, V. M., & Pohoață, I. (2020). The sustainable development theory: A critical approach (vol. 1: The discourse of the founders). New York: Palgrave McMillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast). Text with EEA relevance.]Search in Google Scholar
[Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2000/31/EC of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dollar, D., Kleineberg, T., & Kraay, A. (2013). Growth still is good for the poor. (Policy Research Working Paper No. 6568). The Macroeconomics and Growth Team, Development Research Group. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.10.1596/1813-9450-6568]Search in Google Scholar
[Domorenok, E. (2019). Governing sustainability in the EU. From political discourse to policy practices. Abington & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315315003]Search in Google Scholar
[Duch-Brown, N., & Martens, B. (2016). The economic impact of removing geo-blocking restrictions in the EU Digital Single Market. (Digital Economy Working Paper No.2016/02). Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre.10.2139/ssrn.2783647]Search in Google Scholar
[Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90-100.10.2307/41165746]Search in Google Scholar
[ENISA. (2017). Overview on the implementation and uptake of trust services: One year after the switch over. European Union Agency for Network and Information Security.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2015a). Why we need a Digital Single Market. Retrieved June 20, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/dsm-fact-sheet_en.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2015b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and to the Committee of the Regions. A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0192&from=EN]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2015c). Europe’s Digital Single Market. Brussels, COM (2015), 192.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2018a). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Digital Europe Programme for the period 2021−2027. Explanatory memorandum 306 final. Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2018b). Digital Single Market 2018, High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/high-level-expert-group-artificial-intelligence]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2020a). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Methodological Note. Retrieved June 6, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2020b). Shaping Europe’s digital future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Parliament. (2017). Civil law rules on robotics. European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Giffi, C. (Ed.) (2019, July). Looking ahead. Staying ahead. Organizational transformation. Cyber. Future of mobility. Technology & Society, Deloitte Review, 25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 433-44810.1007/s10784-016-9323-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Hák, T., Janousková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565-573.10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Hemmati, H., Dodds, F., & Enayati, J. (2002). Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability. Beyond deadlock and conflict. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2014). Sustainable development: Our common future revisited. Global Environmental Change, 26(1), 130-139.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary General. (2019). Global sustainable development report: The future is now—Science for achieving sustainable development. New York: UN. Retrieved September 10, 2020 from https://sustain-abledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/24797GSDR_report_2019.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Jejdling, F. (2019, June). Ericsson mobility report. Retrieved June 18, 2020 from https://www.ericsson.com/assets/local/mobility-report/documents/2019/ericsson-mobility-report-june-2019.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Komiyama, K. H., & Takeuchi, K. (2006). Sustainability science: Building a new discipline. Sustainability Science, 1.10.1007/s11625-006-0007-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Krämer, J., Senellart, P., & de Streel, A. (2020). Making data portability more effective for the digital economy. Economic implications and regulatory challenges. Report. Brussels: CERRE.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411-433.10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, J. Y. (2012). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.10.1596/978-0-8213-8955-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Mărcuț, M. (2017). Crystalizing the EU digital policy. An exploration into the Digital Single Market. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-69227-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Mărcuț, M. (2019). Building a stronger Europe—Governing the Digital Single Market. In A. Adamczyk, M. Dziembała, A. Kłos & M. Pachocka (Eds.), EU facing current challenges, opportunities & conflicts (pp. 50-61). Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matusiak, M., Stancova, K. C., Dosso, M., Daniels, C., & Miedzenski, M. (2020). Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) for SDGs roadmaps. Background paper: Overview of the existing STI for SDGs roadmapping methodologies. New York: UN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miedzinski, M., Kanehira, N., Cervantes, M., Mealy, S., Kotani, R., & Bollati E. (2020). Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) for SDGs Roadmaps—Background Paper: International STI collaboration and investment for Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/269391_BP_Roadmaps_IntlCollaberation_final_7_09_20.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Open Medicine, 3(3), 123-130. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.00510.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Mulder, P., & van Bergh, J. (2001, winter). Evolutionary economics theories of sustainable development. A Journal of Urban and Regional Policy, 32(1), 101-134.10.1111/0017-4815.00152]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. (2015). OECD DSTI/STP/MIN(2015)1, Meeting of the OECD Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy at Ministerial Level: Creating our common future through science, technology and innovation. 20-21 October 2015, Daejeon. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/science/sci-tech/sti-ministerial-2015.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Paris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559-586.10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105551]Search in Google Scholar
[Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., … & Duffy S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Lancaster: Lancaster University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Redclift, M. (1993). Sustainable development: Needs, values, rights. Environmental Values, 2(1), 3-20. doi:10.3197/09632719377667998110.3197/096327193776679981]Search in Google Scholar
[Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G,, & Fuller, G. (2019). Sustainable development report 2019. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).]Search in Google Scholar
[Scholte, J. A., & Söderbaum, F. (2017). A changing global development agenda?. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1), 1-12. doi:10.1080/08039410.2017.127584310.1080/08039410.2017.1275843]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, J. M., Petropoulos, G., & Yeung, T. (2019). Contribution to growth: The European Digital Single Market. Delivering economic benefits for citizens and businesses. Luxembourg: European Parliament.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stiglitz, J. (2019). People, power, and profits: Progressive capitalism for an age of discontent. London: Penguin UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stone, A. (2017). These 17 goals have a triple bottom line. Retrieved October 14, 2020 from https://ecopreserve.net/sdg/]Search in Google Scholar
[Streel de, A. (2019). The future of the digital market. Brussels: CERRE.]Search in Google Scholar
[The World in 2050. (2019). The digital revolution and sustainable development: Opportunities and challenges. Report prepared by The World in 2050 initiative. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. (2015). New York: United Nations. Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda]Search in Google Scholar
[UN. (2020). The sustainable development goals report 2019. New York: United Nations.]Search in Google Scholar
[UN Environment. (2020, March 3). Coronavirus outbreak highlights need to address threats to ecosystems and wildlife. Retrieved January 18, 2021 from https://www.unenvironment.org/news-andstories/story/coronavirusoutbreak-highlights-need-address-threats-ecosystemsand-wildlife]Search in Google Scholar
[Young, O. R. (1997). Global Governance: Drawing insights from the environmental experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar