A contemporary review of non-invasive methods in diagnosing abdominal aortic aneurysms

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Underlying Cause of Death 1999–2019 on CDC WONDER Online Database, released 2020. Data are from the Multiple Cause of Death Files, 1999–2019, as compiled from data provided by the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program. Online: https://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html (dostęp 15.03.2021). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Underlying Cause of Death 1999–2019 on CDC WONDER Online Database, released 2020. Data are from the Multiple Cause of Death Files, 1999–2019, as compiled from data provided by the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program . Online: https://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html (dostęp 15.03.2021) . Search in Google Scholar

2. Deaths, percent of total deaths, and death rates for the 15 leading causes of death in 5-year age groups, by race, and sex: United States, 2015. Online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/lcwk1_2015.pdf (dostęp 15.03.2021). Deaths, percent of total deaths, and death rates for the 15 leading causes of death in 5-year age groups, by race, and sex: United States , 2015 . Online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/lcwk1_2015.pdf (dostęp 15.03.2021) . Search in Google Scholar

3. Guirguis-Blake JM, Beil TL, Senger CA, Coppola EL: Primary care screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA 2019; 322: 2219–2238. Guirguis-Blake JM Beil TL Senger CA Coppola EL : Primary care screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force . JAMA 2019 ; 322 : 2219 – 2238 . 10.1001/jama.2019.1702131821436 Search in Google Scholar

4. Reimerink JJ, van der Laan MJ, Koelemay MJ, Balm R, Legemate DA: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1405–1413. Reimerink JJ van der Laan MJ Koelemay MJ Balm R Legemate DA : Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm . Br J Surg 2013 ; 100 : 1405 – 1413 . 10.1002/bjs.923524037558 Search in Google Scholar

5. US Preventative Services Task Force Recommendation Statement, Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M et al.: Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm US Preventative Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2019; 322: 2211–2218. US Preventative Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Owens DK Davidson KW Krist AH Barry MJ Cabana M : Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm US Preventative Services Task Force Recommendation Statement . JAMA 2019 ; 322 : 2211 – 2218 . 10.1001/jama.2019.1892831821437 Search in Google Scholar

6. Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, Jackson BM, Lee WA, Mansour MA et al.: The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67: 2–77.e2. Chaikof EL Dalman RL Eskandari MK Jackson BM Lee WA Mansour MA : The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm . J Vasc Surg 2018 ; 67 : 2 – 77 . e2 . 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.04429268916 Search in Google Scholar

7. Makrygiannis G, Labalue P, Erpicum M, Schlitz M, Seidel L, El Hachemi M et al.: Extending abdominal aortic aneurysm detection to older age older age groups: Preliminary results from the Liege screening programme. Ann Vasc Surg 2016; 36: 55–63. Makrygiannis G Labalue P Erpicum M Schlitz M Seidel L El Hachemi M : Extending abdominal aortic aneurysm detection to older age older age groups: Preliminary results from the Liege screening programme . Ann Vasc Surg 2016 ; 36 : 55 – 63 . 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.02.03427364735 Search in Google Scholar

8. Lederle FA, Simel DL: The rational clinical examination: does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? JAMA 1999; 281: 77–82. Lederle FA Simel DL : The rational clinical examination: does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? JAMA 1999 ; 281 : 77 – 82 . 10.1001/jama.281.1.779892455 Search in Google Scholar

9. Bryce Y, Rogoff P, Romanelli D, Reichle R: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: vascular anatomy, device selection, procedure, and procedure–specific complications. Radiographics 2015; 35: 593–615. Bryce Y Rogoff P Romanelli D Reichle R : Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: vascular anatomy, device selection, procedure, and procedure–specific complications . Radiographics 2015 ; 35 : 593 – 615 . 10.1148/rg.35214004525763741 Search in Google Scholar

10. Johnston KW, Rutherford RB, Tilson MD, Shah DM, Hollier L, Stanley JC: Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. Subcommittee on Reporting Standards for Arterial Aneurysms, Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 1991; 13: 452–458. Johnston KW Rutherford RB Tilson MD Shah DM Hollier L Stanley JC : Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. Subcommittee on Reporting Standards for Arterial Aneurysms, Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery . J Vasc Surg 1991 ; 13 : 452 – 458 . 10.1067/mva.1991.267371999868 Search in Google Scholar

11. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al.: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700. Liberati A Altman DG Tetzlaff J Mulrow C Gøtzsche PC Ioannidis JP : The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration . BMJ 2009 ; 339 : b2700 . 10.1136/bmj.b2700271467219622552 Search in Google Scholar

12. Ruff A, Patel K, Joyce JR, Gornik HL, Rothberg MB: The use of preexisting CT imaging in screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Vasc Med 2016; 21: 515–519. Ruff A Patel K Joyce JR Gornik HL Rothberg MB : The use of preexisting CT imaging in screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms . Vasc Med 2016 ; 21 : 515 – 519 . 10.1177/1358863X1665150527235992 Search in Google Scholar

13. Claridge R, Arnold S, Morrison N, van Rij A: Measuring abdominal aortic diameters in routine abdominal computed tomography scans and implications for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. J Vas Surg 2017; 65: 1637–1642. Claridge R Arnold S Morrison N van Rij A : Measuring abdominal aortic diameters in routine abdominal computed tomography scans and implications for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening . J Vas Surg 2017 ; 65 : 1637 – 1642 . 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.04428216357 Search in Google Scholar

14. Liisberg M, Diederichsen A, Lindholt J: Abdominal ultrasound-scanning versus non-contrast computed tomography as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm-a validation study from the randomized DANCAVAS study. BMC Med Imaging 2017; 17: 1–8. Liisberg M Diederichsen A Lindholt J : Abdominal ultrasound-scanning versus non-contrast computed tomography as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm-a validation study from the randomized DANCAVAS study . BMC Med Imaging 2017 ; 17 : 1 – 8 . 10.1186/s12880-017-0186-8530783328193267 Search in Google Scholar

15. Shalan A, Forsyth J, Thompson A: Observational Study Comparing the Measurement of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Diameter in Different Morphology with Ultrasound and CT Scan. J Clin Diagn Res 2018; 12: PC05–PC07. Shalan A Forsyth J Thompson A : Observational Study Comparing the Measurement of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Diameter in Different Morphology with Ultrasound and CT Scan . J Clin Diagn Res 2018 ; 12 : PC05 – PC07 . 10.7860/JCDR/2018/35413.11665 Search in Google Scholar

16. Zur G, Andraous M, Bercovich E, Litvin M, Ofer A, Gaitini D et al.: CT-ultrasound fusion for abdominal aortic aneurysm measurement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214: 472–476. Zur G Andraous M Bercovich E Litvin M Ofer A Gaitini D : CT-ultrasound fusion for abdominal aortic aneurysm measurement . AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020 ; 214 : 472 – 476 . 10.2214/AJR.19.2167031825260 Search in Google Scholar

17. Zha Y, Peng G, Li L, Yang C, Lu X, Peng Z: Quantitative aortic distensibility measurement using CT in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: reproducibility and clinical relevance. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 5436927. Zha Y Peng G Li L Yang C Lu X Peng Z : Quantitative aortic distensibility measurement using CT in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: reproducibility and clinical relevance . Biomed Res Int 2017 ; 2017 : 5436927 . 10.1155/2017/5436927541214328484713 Search in Google Scholar

18. Kontopodis N, Metaxa E, Pagonidis K, Ioannou C, Papaharilaou Y: Deformation and distensibility distribution along the abdominal aorta in the presence of aneurysmal dilatation. J Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 58: 72–79. Kontopodis N Metaxa E Pagonidis K Ioannou C Papaharilaou Y : Deformation and distensibility distribution along the abdominal aorta in the presence of aneurysmal dilatation . J Cardiovasc Surg 2017 ; 58 : 72 – 79 . 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.07737-524326896 Search in Google Scholar

19. Wilson KA, Lee AJ, Lee AJ, Hoskins PR, Fowkes FG, Ruckley CV et al.: The relationship between aortic wall distensibility and rupture of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37: 112–117. Wilson KA Lee AJ Lee AJ Hoskins PR Fowkes FG Ruckley CV : The relationship between aortic wall distensibility and rupture of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm . J Vasc Surg 2003 ; 37 : 112 – 117 . 10.1067/mva.2003.4012514586 Search in Google Scholar

20. Stather PW, Sidloff DA, Rhema IA, Choke E, Bown MJ, Sayers RD: A review of current reporting of abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality and prevalence in the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47: 240–242. Stather PW Sidloff DA Rhema IA Choke E Bown MJ Sayers RD : A review of current reporting of abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality and prevalence in the literature . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014 ; 47 : 240 – 242 . 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.11.00724368205 Search in Google Scholar

21. Schermerhorn ML, Buck DB, O’Malley AJ, Curran T, McCallum J, Darling J et al.: Long-term outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the medicare population. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 328–238. Schermerhorn ML Buck DB O’Malley AJ Curran T McCallum J Darling J : Long-term outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the medicare population . N Engl J Med 2015 ; 373 : 328 – 238 . 10.1056/NEJMoa1405778453230326200979 Search in Google Scholar

22. Ali MU, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Miller J, Warren R, Kenny M, Sherifali D et al.: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in asymptomatic adults. J Vasc Surg 2016; 64: 1855–1868. Ali MU Fitzpatrick-Lewis D Miller J Warren R Kenny M Sherifali D : Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in asymptomatic adults . J Vasc Surg 2016 ; 64 : 1855 – 1868 . 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.10127871502 Search in Google Scholar

23. LaRoy LL, Cormier PJ, Matalon TA, Patel SK, Turner DA, Silver B: Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 152: 785–792. LaRoy LL Cormier PJ Matalon TA Patel SK Turner DA Silver B : Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms . AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989 ; 152 : 785 – 792 . 10.2214/ajr.152.4.785 Search in Google Scholar

24. Mehta M, Taggert J, Darling R, Chang B, Kreienberg P, Paty P et al.: Establishing a protocol for endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: outcomes of a prospective analysis. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 1–8. Mehta M Taggert J Darling R Chang B Kreienberg P Paty P : Establishing a protocol for endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: outcomes of a prospective analysis . J Vasc Surg 2006 ; 44 : 1 – 8 . 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.02.057 Search in Google Scholar

25. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Kim LG, Marteau TM, Scott RA et al.: The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1531–1539. Ashton HA Buxton MJ Day NE Kim LG Marteau TM Scott RA : The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial . Lancet 2002 ; 360 : 1531 – 1539 . 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11522-4 Search in Google Scholar

26. Norman PE, Jamrozik K, Lawrence-Brown MM, Le MT, Spencer CA, Tuohy RJ et al.: Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ 2004; 329: 1259. Norman PE Jamrozik K Lawrence-Brown MM Le MT Spencer CA Tuohy RJ : Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm . BMJ 2004 ; 329 : 1259 . 10.1136/bmj.38272.478438.5553443815545293 Search in Google Scholar

27. Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005; 330: 750. Lindholt JS Juul S Fasting H Henneberg EW : Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial . BMJ 2005 ; 330 : 750 . 10.1136/bmj.38369.620162.8255587315757960 Search in Google Scholar

28. Ashton H, Gao L, Kim L, Druce P, Thompson S, Scott R: Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of ultrasonographic. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 696–701. Ashton H Gao L Kim L Druce P Thompson S Scott R : Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of ultrasonographic . Br J Surg 2007 ; 94 : 696 – 701 . 10.1002/bjs.578017514666 Search in Google Scholar

29. Chiu K, Ling L, Tripathi V, Ahmed M, Shrivastava V: Ultrasound measurement for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: a direct comparison of the three leading methods. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47: 367–373. Chiu K Ling L Tripathi V Ahmed M Shrivastava V : Ultrasound measurement for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: a direct comparison of the three leading methods . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014 ; 47 : 367 – 373 . 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.12.02624491283 Search in Google Scholar

30. Gürtelschmid M, Björck M, Wanhainen A: Comparison of three ultrasound methods of measuring the diameter of the abdominal aorta. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 633–636. Gürtelschmid M Björck M Wanhainen A : Comparison of three ultrasound methods of measuring the diameter of the abdominal aorta . Br J Surg 2014 ; 101 : 633 – 636 . 10.1002/bjs.946324723017 Search in Google Scholar

31. Hartshorne TC, McCollum CN, Earnshaw JJ, Morris J, Nasim A: Ultrasound measurement of aortic diameter in a national screening programme. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42: 195–199. Hartshorne TC McCollum CN Earnshaw JJ Morris J Nasim A : Ultrasound measurement of aortic diameter in a national screening programme . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011 ; 42 : 195 – 199 . 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.02.03021439859 Search in Google Scholar

32. Meecham L, Evans R, Buxton P, Allingham K, Hughes M, Rajagopalan S et al.: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Diameters: a study on the discrepancy between inner to inner and outer to outer measurements. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49: 28–32. Meecham L Evans R Buxton P Allingham K Hughes M Rajagopalan S : Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Diameters: a study on the discrepancy between inner to inner and outer to outer measurements . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015 ; 49 : 28 – 32 . 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.10.00225453235 Search in Google Scholar

33. Lederle F, Wilson S, Johnson G, Reinke D, Littooy F, Archer C et al.: Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21: 945–952. Lederle F Wilson S Johnson G Reinke D Littooy F Archer C : Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group . J Vasc Surg 1995 ; 21 : 945 – 952 . 10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70222-9 Search in Google Scholar

34. Kritpracha B, Wolfe J, Beebe HG: CT artifacts of the proximal aortic neck: an important problem in endograft planning. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: 103–110. Kritpracha B Wolfe J Beebe HG : CT artifacts of the proximal aortic neck: an important problem in endograft planning . J Endovasc Ther 2002 ; 9 : 103 – 110 . 10.1177/15266028020090011711958313 Search in Google Scholar

35. Lee SH, Lee W, Choi HJ, Kim DJ, Park EA, Chung JW et al.: Measurement of the aortic diameter in the asymptomatic Korean population: assessment with multidetector CT. J Korean Soc Radiol 2013; 69: 105–112. Lee SH Lee W Choi HJ Kim DJ Park EA Chung JW : Measurement of the aortic diameter in the asymptomatic Korean population: assessment with multidetector CT . J Korean Soc Radiol 2013 ; 69 : 105 – 112 . 10.3348/jksr.2013.69.2.105 Search in Google Scholar

36. Murphy DJ, Aghayev A, Steigner ML: Vascular CT and MRI: a practical guide to imaging protocols. Insights Imaging 2018; 9: 215–236. Murphy DJ Aghayev A Steigner ML : Vascular CT and MRI: a practical guide to imaging protocols . Insights Imaging 2018 ; 9 : 215 – 236 . 10.1007/s13244-018-0597-2589349329541955 Search in Google Scholar