This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Underlying Cause of Death 1999–2019 on CDC WONDER Online Database, released 2020. Data are from the Multiple Cause of Death Files, 1999–2019, as compiled from data provided by the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program. Online: https://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html (dostęp 15.03.2021)..Online: https://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html (dostęp 15.03.2021).Search in Google Scholar
Deaths, percent of total deaths, and death rates for the 15 leading causes of death in 5-year age groups, by race, and sex: United States, 2015. Online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/lcwk1_2015.pdf (dostęp 15.03.2021).,2015.Online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/lcwk1_2015.pdf (dostęp 15.03.2021).Search in Google Scholar
Guirguis-Blake JM, Beil TL, Senger CA, Coppola EL: Primary care screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA 2019; 322: 2219–2238.Guirguis-BlakeJMBeilTLSengerCACoppolaEL:Primary care screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force.2019;322:2219–2238.10.1001/jama.2019.1702131821436Search in Google Scholar
Reimerink JJ, van der Laan MJ, Koelemay MJ, Balm R, Legemate DA: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1405–1413.ReimerinkJJvan der LaanMJKoelemayMJBalmRLegemateDA:Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.2013;100:1405–1413.10.1002/bjs.923524037558Search in Google Scholar
US Preventative Services Task Force Recommendation Statement, Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M et al.: Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm US Preventative Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2019; 322: 2211–2218.US Preventative Services Task Force Recommendation StatementOwensDKDavidsonKWKristAHBarryMJCabanaM:Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm US Preventative Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.2019;322:2211–2218.10.1001/jama.2019.1892831821437Search in Google Scholar
Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, Jackson BM, Lee WA, Mansour MA et al.: The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67: 2–77.e2.ChaikofELDalmanRLEskandariMKJacksonBMLeeWAMansourMA:The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.2018;67:2–77.e2.10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.04429268916Search in Google Scholar
Makrygiannis G, Labalue P, Erpicum M, Schlitz M, Seidel L, El Hachemi M et al.: Extending abdominal aortic aneurysm detection to older age older age groups: Preliminary results from the Liege screening programme. Ann Vasc Surg 2016; 36: 55–63.MakrygiannisGLabaluePErpicumMSchlitzMSeidelLEl HachemiM:Extending abdominal aortic aneurysm detection to older age older age groups: Preliminary results from the Liege screening programme.2016;36:55–63.10.1016/j.avsg.2016.02.03427364735Search in Google Scholar
Lederle FA, Simel DL: The rational clinical examination: does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? JAMA 1999; 281: 77–82.LederleFASimelDL:The rational clinical examination: does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm?1999;281:77–82.10.1001/jama.281.1.779892455Search in Google Scholar
Bryce Y, Rogoff P, Romanelli D, Reichle R: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: vascular anatomy, device selection, procedure, and procedure–specific complications. Radiographics 2015; 35: 593–615.BryceYRogoffPRomanelliDReichleR:Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: vascular anatomy, device selection, procedure, and procedure–specific complications.2015;35:593–615.10.1148/rg.35214004525763741Search in Google Scholar
Johnston KW, Rutherford RB, Tilson MD, Shah DM, Hollier L, Stanley JC: Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. Subcommittee on Reporting Standards for Arterial Aneurysms, Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 1991; 13: 452–458.JohnstonKWRutherfordRBTilsonMDShahDMHollierLStanleyJC:Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. Subcommittee on Reporting Standards for Arterial Aneurysms, Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery.1991;13:452–458.10.1067/mva.1991.267371999868Search in Google Scholar
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al.: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700.LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJMulrowCGøtzschePCIoannidisJP:The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.2009;339:b2700.10.1136/bmj.b2700271467219622552Search in Google Scholar
Ruff A, Patel K, Joyce JR, Gornik HL, Rothberg MB: The use of preexisting CT imaging in screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Vasc Med 2016; 21: 515–519.RuffAPatelKJoyceJRGornikHLRothbergMB:The use of preexisting CT imaging in screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms.2016;21:515–519.10.1177/1358863X1665150527235992Search in Google Scholar
Claridge R, Arnold S, Morrison N, van Rij A: Measuring abdominal aortic diameters in routine abdominal computed tomography scans and implications for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. J Vas Surg 2017; 65: 1637–1642.ClaridgeRArnoldSMorrisonNvan RijA:Measuring abdominal aortic diameters in routine abdominal computed tomography scans and implications for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.2017;65:1637–1642.10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.04428216357Search in Google Scholar
Liisberg M, Diederichsen A, Lindholt J: Abdominal ultrasound-scanning versus non-contrast computed tomography as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm-a validation study from the randomized DANCAVAS study. BMC Med Imaging 2017; 17: 1–8.LiisbergMDiederichsenALindholtJ:Abdominal ultrasound-scanning versus non-contrast computed tomography as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm-a validation study from the randomized DANCAVAS study.2017;17:1–8.10.1186/s12880-017-0186-8530783328193267Search in Google Scholar
Shalan A, Forsyth J, Thompson A: Observational Study Comparing the Measurement of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Diameter in Different Morphology with Ultrasound and CT Scan. J Clin Diagn Res 2018; 12: PC05–PC07.ShalanAForsythJThompsonA:Observational Study Comparing the Measurement of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Diameter in Different Morphology with Ultrasound and CT Scan.2018;12:PC05–PC07.10.7860/JCDR/2018/35413.11665Search in Google Scholar
Zur G, Andraous M, Bercovich E, Litvin M, Ofer A, Gaitini D et al.: CT-ultrasound fusion for abdominal aortic aneurysm measurement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214: 472–476.ZurGAndraousMBercovichELitvinMOferAGaitiniD:CT-ultrasound fusion for abdominal aortic aneurysm measurement.2020;214:472–476.10.2214/AJR.19.2167031825260Search in Google Scholar
Zha Y, Peng G, Li L, Yang C, Lu X, Peng Z: Quantitative aortic distensibility measurement using CT in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: reproducibility and clinical relevance. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 5436927.ZhaYPengGLiLYangCLuXPengZ:Quantitative aortic distensibility measurement using CT in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: reproducibility and clinical relevance.2017;2017:5436927.10.1155/2017/5436927541214328484713Search in Google Scholar
Kontopodis N, Metaxa E, Pagonidis K, Ioannou C, Papaharilaou Y: Deformation and distensibility distribution along the abdominal aorta in the presence of aneurysmal dilatation. J Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 58: 72–79.KontopodisNMetaxaEPagonidisKIoannouCPapaharilaouY:Deformation and distensibility distribution along the abdominal aorta in the presence of aneurysmal dilatation.2017;58:72–79.10.23736/S0021-9509.16.07737-524326896Search in Google Scholar
Wilson KA, Lee AJ, Lee AJ, Hoskins PR, Fowkes FG, Ruckley CV et al.: The relationship between aortic wall distensibility and rupture of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37: 112–117.WilsonKALeeAJLeeAJHoskinsPRFowkesFGRuckleyCV:The relationship between aortic wall distensibility and rupture of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.2003;37:112–117.10.1067/mva.2003.4012514586Search in Google Scholar
Stather PW, Sidloff DA, Rhema IA, Choke E, Bown MJ, Sayers RD: A review of current reporting of abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality and prevalence in the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47: 240–242.StatherPWSidloffDARhemaIAChokeEBownMJSayersRD:A review of current reporting of abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality and prevalence in the literature.2014;47:240–242.10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.11.00724368205Search in Google Scholar
Schermerhorn ML, Buck DB, O’Malley AJ, Curran T, McCallum J, Darling J et al.: Long-term outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the medicare population. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 328–238.SchermerhornMLBuckDBO’MalleyAJCurranTMcCallumJDarlingJ:Long-term outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the medicare population.2015;373:328–238.10.1056/NEJMoa1405778453230326200979Search in Google Scholar
Ali MU, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Miller J, Warren R, Kenny M, Sherifali D et al.: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in asymptomatic adults. J Vasc Surg 2016; 64: 1855–1868.AliMUFitzpatrick-LewisDMillerJWarrenRKennyMSherifaliD:Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in asymptomatic adults.2016;64:1855–1868.10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.10127871502Search in Google Scholar
LaRoy LL, Cormier PJ, Matalon TA, Patel SK, Turner DA, Silver B: Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 152: 785–792.LaRoyLLCormierPJMatalonTAPatelSKTurnerDASilverB:Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms.1989;152:785–792.10.2214/ajr.152.4.785Search in Google Scholar
Mehta M, Taggert J, Darling R, Chang B, Kreienberg P, Paty P et al.: Establishing a protocol for endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: outcomes of a prospective analysis. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 1–8.MehtaMTaggertJDarlingRChangBKreienbergPPatyP:Establishing a protocol for endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: outcomes of a prospective analysis.2006;44:1–8.10.1016/j.jvs.2006.02.057Search in Google Scholar
Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Kim LG, Marteau TM, Scott RA et al.: The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1531–1539.AshtonHABuxtonMJDayNEKimLGMarteauTMScottRA:The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial.2002;360:1531–1539.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11522-4Search in Google Scholar
Norman PE, Jamrozik K, Lawrence-Brown MM, Le MT, Spencer CA, Tuohy RJ et al.: Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ 2004; 329: 1259.NormanPEJamrozikKLawrence-BrownMMLeMTSpencerCATuohyRJ:Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm.2004;329:1259.10.1136/bmj.38272.478438.5553443815545293Search in Google Scholar
Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005; 330: 750.LindholtJSJuulSFastingHHennebergEW:Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial.2005;330:750.10.1136/bmj.38369.620162.8255587315757960Search in Google Scholar
Ashton H, Gao L, Kim L, Druce P, Thompson S, Scott R: Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of ultrasonographic. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 696–701.AshtonHGaoLKimLDrucePThompsonSScottR:Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of ultrasonographic.2007;94:696–701.10.1002/bjs.578017514666Search in Google Scholar
Chiu K, Ling L, Tripathi V, Ahmed M, Shrivastava V: Ultrasound measurement for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: a direct comparison of the three leading methods. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47: 367–373.ChiuKLingLTripathiVAhmedMShrivastavaV:Ultrasound measurement for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: a direct comparison of the three leading methods.2014;47:367–373.10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.12.02624491283Search in Google Scholar
Gürtelschmid M, Björck M, Wanhainen A: Comparison of three ultrasound methods of measuring the diameter of the abdominal aorta. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 633–636.GürtelschmidMBjörckMWanhainenA:Comparison of three ultrasound methods of measuring the diameter of the abdominal aorta.2014;101:633–636.10.1002/bjs.946324723017Search in Google Scholar
Hartshorne TC, McCollum CN, Earnshaw JJ, Morris J, Nasim A: Ultrasound measurement of aortic diameter in a national screening programme. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42: 195–199.HartshorneTCMcCollumCNEarnshawJJMorrisJNasimA:Ultrasound measurement of aortic diameter in a national screening programme.2011;42:195–199.10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.02.03021439859Search in Google Scholar
Meecham L, Evans R, Buxton P, Allingham K, Hughes M, Rajagopalan S et al.: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Diameters: a study on the discrepancy between inner to inner and outer to outer measurements. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49: 28–32.MeechamLEvansRBuxtonPAllinghamKHughesMRajagopalanS:Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Diameters: a study on the discrepancy between inner to inner and outer to outer measurements.2015;49:28–32.10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.10.00225453235Search in Google Scholar
Lederle F, Wilson S, Johnson G, Reinke D, Littooy F, Archer C et al.: Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21: 945–952.LederleFWilsonSJohnsonGReinkeDLittooyFArcherC:Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group.1995;21:945–952.10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70222-9Search in Google Scholar
Kritpracha B, Wolfe J, Beebe HG: CT artifacts of the proximal aortic neck: an important problem in endograft planning. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: 103–110.KritprachaBWolfeJBeebeHG:CT artifacts of the proximal aortic neck: an important problem in endograft planning.2002;9:103–110.10.1177/15266028020090011711958313Search in Google Scholar
Lee SH, Lee W, Choi HJ, Kim DJ, Park EA, Chung JW et al.: Measurement of the aortic diameter in the asymptomatic Korean population: assessment with multidetector CT. J Korean Soc Radiol 2013; 69: 105–112.LeeSHLeeWChoiHJKimDJParkEAChungJW:Measurement of the aortic diameter in the asymptomatic Korean population: assessment with multidetector CT.2013;69:105–112.10.3348/jksr.2013.69.2.105Search in Google Scholar
Murphy DJ, Aghayev A, Steigner ML: Vascular CT and MRI: a practical guide to imaging protocols. Insights Imaging 2018; 9: 215–236.MurphyDJAghayevASteignerML:Vascular CT and MRI: a practical guide to imaging protocols.2018;9:215–236.10.1007/s13244-018-0597-2589349329541955Search in Google Scholar