Amar V. D., Morse, School Speech, and Originalism, „UC Davis Law Review” 2009, vol. 42.Search in Google Scholar
Beckwith F.J., Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice, New York 2007.Search in Google Scholar
Beckwith F.J., The Supreme Court, Roe v. Wade, and Abortion Law, „Liberty University Law Review” 2006, vol. 1.Search in Google Scholar
Berger R., Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Indianapolis 1977.Search in Google Scholar
Black H. Campbell, The Principle of Stare Decisis, „The American Law Register” December 1886.Search in Google Scholar
Bork R.H., The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law, New York 1990. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Search in Google Scholar
Chemerinsky E., Ending Roe is a Pure Exercise of Republican Power, Wielded to Reduce Women’s Freedom and Equality, „Los Angeles Times” 24.06.2022.Search in Google Scholar
Forsythe C.D., A Draft Opinion Overruling Roe v. Wade, „The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy” 2018, vol. 16.Search in Google Scholar
Freeman S., Quillin K., Allison L., Black M., Podgorski G., Taylor E., Carmichael J., Biological Science, Harlow 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Gans D.H., Reproductive Originalism: Why the Fourteenth Amendment’s Original Meaning Protects the Right to Abortion, „SMU Law Review Forum” February 2022.Search in Google Scholar
Lazzarini Z., The End of Roe v. Wade – States’ Power Over Health and Well-Being, „New England Journal of Medicine” 2022, vol. 387.Search in Google Scholar
Levy L.W., Seasoned Judgments: The American Constitution, Rights, and History, New Brunswick 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Machaj Ł., The United States Supreme Court Reverses Itself: Sense of Injustice or Public Pressure?, „Przegląd Prawa i Administracji” 2015, vol. C/I.Search in Google Scholar
Marcus N.C., Yes, Alito, There Is a Right to Privacy: Why the Leaked Dobbs Opinion Is Doctrinally Unsound, „ConLawNOW” 2022, vol. 13.Search in Google Scholar
Nowak J.E., Rotunda R.D., Nelson Young J., Constitutional Law, St. Paul 1983.Search in Google Scholar
Norris P., Inglehart R., Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism, New York 2019. Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).Search in Google Scholar
Peachman K.N., The Need to Codify Roe v. Wade: A Case for National Abortion Legislation, „Journal of Legislation” 2019, vol. 45.Search in Google Scholar
Perry S.P, Jipping T., Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: An Opportunity to Correct a Grave Error, Washington 2021.Search in Google Scholar
Planned Parenthood of Southern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).Search in Google Scholar
Scalia A., Common-law Courts in a Civil Law System: the Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting Constitution and Laws, (w:) A. Gutmann (red.), A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, Princeton 1997.Search in Google Scholar
Simson G.J., Simson R.S., Rescuing Roe, „Legislation and Public Policy” 2022, vol. 24.Search in Google Scholar
Singer P., Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of our Traditional Ethics, New York 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Strossen N., Justice Ginsburg’s Legacy: Promoting All Fundamental Freedoms for All People Through Strategic Alliances and Incremental Reform, „New York Law School Law Review” 2021/22, vol. 66.Search in Google Scholar