Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: The Epitaph for Roe v. Wade

1Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923).Search in Google Scholar

2Amar V. D., Morse, School Speech, and Originalism, „UC Davis Law Review” 2009, vol. 42.Search in Google Scholar

3Beckwith F.J., Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice, New York 2007.Search in Google Scholar

4Beckwith F.J., The Supreme Court, Roe v. Wade, and Abortion Law, „Liberty University Law Review” 2006, vol. 1.Search in Google Scholar

5Berger R., Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Indianapolis 1977.Search in Google Scholar

6Black H. Campbell, The Principle of Stare Decisis, „The American Law Register” December 1886.Search in Google Scholar

7Bork R.H., The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law, New York 1990. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Search in Google Scholar

8Butler J., Undoing Gender, New York 2004.Search in Google Scholar

9Chemerinsky E., Ending Roe is a Pure Exercise of Republican Power, Wielded to Reduce Women’s Freedom and Equality, „Los Angeles Times” 24.06.2022.Search in Google Scholar

10Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1 (1915).Search in Google Scholar

11Day T., Weatherby D., The Dobbs Effect: Abortion Rights in the Rear-View Mirror and the Civil Rights Search in Google Scholar

12Crisis that Lies Ahead, „William & Mary Law Review Online” 2022, vol. 64.Search in Google Scholar

13Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. (2022).Search in Google Scholar

14Dworkin R., Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom, New York 1993.Search in Google Scholar

15Epstein L., Knight J., The Choices Justices Make, Washington 1998.Search in Google Scholar

16Epstein L., Walker T.G., Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and Justice, Washington 1992.Search in Google Scholar

17Fallon R.H., Jr., Implementing the Constitution, Cambridge 2001.Search in Google Scholar

18Ferrando F., Philosophical Posthumanism, London 2019.Search in Google Scholar

19Forsythe C.D., A Draft Opinion Overruling Roe v. Wade, „The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy” 2018, vol. 16.Search in Google Scholar

20Freeman S., Quillin K., Allison L., Black M., Podgorski G., Taylor E., Carmichael J., Biological Science, Harlow 2017.Search in Google Scholar

21Gans D.H., Reproductive Originalism: Why the Fourteenth Amendment’s Original Meaning Protects the Right to Abortion, „SMU Law Review Forum” February 2022.Search in Google Scholar

22Gerhardt M.J, The Power of Precedent, New York 2011.Search in Google Scholar

23Glover J., Causing Death and Saving Lives, London 1990.Search in Google Scholar

24Greenhouse L., Becoming Justice Blackmun: Harry Blackmun’s Supreme Court Journey, New York 2005.Search in Google Scholar

25Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Search in Google Scholar

26Guiness O., The Case for Civility and Why Our Future Depends on It, New York 2008.Search in Google Scholar

27Horowitz D., Dark Agenda: The War to Destroy Christian America, West Palm Beach 2018.Search in Google Scholar

28Lazarus E., Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall and Future of the Modern Supreme Court, New York 1999.Search in Google Scholar

29Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).Search in Google Scholar

30Lazzarini Z., The End of Roe v. Wade – States’ Power Over Health and Well-Being, „New England Journal of Medicine” 2022, vol. 387.Search in Google Scholar

31Levy L.W., Seasoned Judgments: The American Constitution, Rights, and History, New Brunswick 1995.Search in Google Scholar

32Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).Search in Google Scholar

33Machaj Ł., The United States Supreme Court Reverses Itself: Sense of Injustice or Public Pressure?, „Przegląd Prawa i Administracji” 2015, vol. C/I.Search in Google Scholar

34Marcus N.C., Yes, Alito, There Is a Right to Privacy: Why the Leaked Dobbs Opinion Is Doctrinally Unsound, „ConLawNOW” 2022, vol. 13.Search in Google Scholar

35Nowak J.E., Rotunda R.D., Nelson Young J., Constitutional Law, St. Paul 1983.Search in Google Scholar

36Norris P., Inglehart R., Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism, New York 2019. Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).Search in Google Scholar

37Peachman K.N., The Need to Codify Roe v. Wade: A Case for National Abortion Legislation, „Journal of Legislation” 2019, vol. 45.Search in Google Scholar

38Perry S.P, Jipping T., Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: An Opportunity to Correct a Grave Error, Washington 2021.Search in Google Scholar

39Planned Parenthood of Southern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).Search in Google Scholar

40Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).Search in Google Scholar

41Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 (1961).Search in Google Scholar

42Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Search in Google Scholar

43Rosenfeld A., Iden S., Abortion, (w:) S.G. Post (red.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, vol. 1, New York 2004.Search in Google Scholar

44Rubenfeld J., On the Legal Status of the Proposition That „Life Begins at Conception”, „Stanford Law Review” 1991, vol. 43.Search in Google Scholar

45Sandel M.J., Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do?, New York 2010.Search in Google Scholar

46Scalia A., Common-law Courts in a Civil Law System: the Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting Constitution and Laws, (w:) A. Gutmann (red.), A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, Princeton 1997.Search in Google Scholar

47Simson G.J., Simson R.S., Rescuing Roe, „Legislation and Public Policy” 2022, vol. 24.Search in Google Scholar

48Singer P., Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of our Traditional Ethics, New York 1995.Search in Google Scholar

49Strauss D.A., The Living Constitution, New York 2010.Search in Google Scholar

50Strossen N., Justice Ginsburg’s Legacy: Promoting All Fundamental Freedoms for All People Through Strategic Alliances and Incremental Reform, „New York Law School Law Review” 2021/22, vol. 66.Search in Google Scholar

51Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997).Search in Google Scholar

52Urbańczyk M., Fight Against Discrimination. Human Dignity in American Legal Tradition, Poznań 2022.Search in Google Scholar

53Viney W., William James’ Pluralism: an Antidote for Contemporary Extremism and Absolutism, New York 2022.Search in Google Scholar

54Ziegler M., Abortion and the law in America: Roe v. Wade to the Present, New York 2020.Search in Google Scholar